Denise C G van Eekelen, A David Scarfe, Jenny F Weston, Patricia V Turner
{"title":"制定全球兽医教育项目评估的质量标准:兽医学院满足劳动力需求的策略-一项全球调查的结果。","authors":"Denise C G van Eekelen, A David Scarfe, Jenny F Weston, Patricia V Turner","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2024-0164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality veterinary education and training programs are essential for ensuring that national veterinary workforces are well prepared to address animal and veterinary public health needs. Standards for veterinary education establishments (VEEs) around the world are thought to be diverse, but little information is available on approaches to curriculum development, quality assurance methods for evaluating veterinary education programs, teaching and assessment approaches, resources for skills development, and requirements for continuing professional development (CPD) of licensed veterinarians. In this study, VEEs within Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and North Africa, Oceania, Europe, Latin America, and North America were surveyed anonymously regarding education programs and curriculum development practices as well as CPD requirements using a structured questionnaire. Responses were received from 186 VEEs across 40 countries and all global regions, with 83% coming from Latin America and Asia. Similar teaching approaches were seen at VEEs across all regions; however, large animal hospitals and ambulatory field service opportunities were less common at VEEs in parts of Asia. Accreditation of the VEE program was mandatory in 66% of facilities, but only 17% of responding VEEs were accredited by an internationally recognized accrediting body. Curriculum review occurred on a periodic basis at 81% of responding VEEs, but approaches varied significantly by region. Finally, 61% of VEEs reported no CPD requirements for licensed veterinarians. The findings suggest there are global opportunities for harmonizing and enhancing VEE program quality through development of self-assessment tools as well as supporting CPD requirements to ensure national veterinary workforce preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"e20240164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Quality Standards for Global Veterinary Education Program Assessments: Veterinary College Strategies to Meet Workforce Demands-Results of a Global Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Denise C G van Eekelen, A David Scarfe, Jenny F Weston, Patricia V Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/jvme-2024-0164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quality veterinary education and training programs are essential for ensuring that national veterinary workforces are well prepared to address animal and veterinary public health needs. Standards for veterinary education establishments (VEEs) around the world are thought to be diverse, but little information is available on approaches to curriculum development, quality assurance methods for evaluating veterinary education programs, teaching and assessment approaches, resources for skills development, and requirements for continuing professional development (CPD) of licensed veterinarians. In this study, VEEs within Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and North Africa, Oceania, Europe, Latin America, and North America were surveyed anonymously regarding education programs and curriculum development practices as well as CPD requirements using a structured questionnaire. Responses were received from 186 VEEs across 40 countries and all global regions, with 83% coming from Latin America and Asia. Similar teaching approaches were seen at VEEs across all regions; however, large animal hospitals and ambulatory field service opportunities were less common at VEEs in parts of Asia. Accreditation of the VEE program was mandatory in 66% of facilities, but only 17% of responding VEEs were accredited by an internationally recognized accrediting body. Curriculum review occurred on a periodic basis at 81% of responding VEEs, but approaches varied significantly by region. Finally, 61% of VEEs reported no CPD requirements for licensed veterinarians. The findings suggest there are global opportunities for harmonizing and enhancing VEE program quality through development of self-assessment tools as well as supporting CPD requirements to ensure national veterinary workforce preparedness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e20240164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0164\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing Quality Standards for Global Veterinary Education Program Assessments: Veterinary College Strategies to Meet Workforce Demands-Results of a Global Survey.
Quality veterinary education and training programs are essential for ensuring that national veterinary workforces are well prepared to address animal and veterinary public health needs. Standards for veterinary education establishments (VEEs) around the world are thought to be diverse, but little information is available on approaches to curriculum development, quality assurance methods for evaluating veterinary education programs, teaching and assessment approaches, resources for skills development, and requirements for continuing professional development (CPD) of licensed veterinarians. In this study, VEEs within Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and North Africa, Oceania, Europe, Latin America, and North America were surveyed anonymously regarding education programs and curriculum development practices as well as CPD requirements using a structured questionnaire. Responses were received from 186 VEEs across 40 countries and all global regions, with 83% coming from Latin America and Asia. Similar teaching approaches were seen at VEEs across all regions; however, large animal hospitals and ambulatory field service opportunities were less common at VEEs in parts of Asia. Accreditation of the VEE program was mandatory in 66% of facilities, but only 17% of responding VEEs were accredited by an internationally recognized accrediting body. Curriculum review occurred on a periodic basis at 81% of responding VEEs, but approaches varied significantly by region. Finally, 61% of VEEs reported no CPD requirements for licensed veterinarians. The findings suggest there are global opportunities for harmonizing and enhancing VEE program quality through development of self-assessment tools as well as supporting CPD requirements to ensure national veterinary workforce preparedness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society.
The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.