Peyman Mirghaderi, Negar Ahmadi, Alireza Azarboo, Mohammad Mirahmadi Eraghi, Mia S Hagen, Majid Chalian
{"title":"使用止血带对关节镜前交叉韧带重建的影响：随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Peyman Mirghaderi, Negar Ahmadi, Alireza Azarboo, Mohammad Mirahmadi Eraghi, Mia S Hagen, Majid Chalian","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament tears are a common injury that is often treated with arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This meta-analysis investigates the impact of tourniquet use on ACLR and the outcomes of this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted across 4 databases: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklist. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between patients who underwent ACLR with versus without a tourniquet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were eligible for systematic review; of these, 6 were eligible for meta-analysis. The CONSORT scores for the studies ranged from 22 to 37. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss (standardized mean difference, with versus without a tourniquet [SMD], -2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.87, 1.58; I 2 = 99%), surgery time (SMD, -0.57; 95% CI: -1.32, 0.18; I 2 = 94%), or Lysholm knee scores after 1 year (SMD, -0.06; 95% CI: -0.33, 0.21; I 2 = 0%). The quality of the arthroscopic visual field varied across the studies. Postoperative pain levels were significantly higher in the tourniquet group (SMD 6-hour follow-up , 1.77; 95% CI: 0.07, 3.47; I 2 = 93%), although morphine consumption did not differ significantly between the groups (SMD, 0.25; 95% CI: -0.83, 1.33; I 2 = 93%). The no-tourniquet group had significantly greater thigh (SMD, -0.46; 95% CI: -0.79, -0.14; I 2 = 36%) and calf (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI: -0.49, -0.03; I 2 = 70%) circumferences postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tourniquet use during ACLR did not significantly impact intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin levels, or surgery time but was associated with increased postoperative pain. The use of epinephrine solution may be a viable alternative to the use of a tourniquet to improve visualization.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"2197-2207"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Tourniquet Use on Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Peyman Mirghaderi, Negar Ahmadi, Alireza Azarboo, Mohammad Mirahmadi Eraghi, Mia S Hagen, Majid Chalian\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.24.00792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament tears are a common injury that is often treated with arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This meta-analysis investigates the impact of tourniquet use on ACLR and the outcomes of this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted across 4 databases: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklist. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between patients who underwent ACLR with versus without a tourniquet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were eligible for systematic review; of these, 6 were eligible for meta-analysis. The CONSORT scores for the studies ranged from 22 to 37. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss (standardized mean difference, with versus without a tourniquet [SMD], -2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.87, 1.58; I 2 = 99%), surgery time (SMD, -0.57; 95% CI: -1.32, 0.18; I 2 = 94%), or Lysholm knee scores after 1 year (SMD, -0.06; 95% CI: -0.33, 0.21; I 2 = 0%). The quality of the arthroscopic visual field varied across the studies. Postoperative pain levels were significantly higher in the tourniquet group (SMD 6-hour follow-up , 1.77; 95% CI: 0.07, 3.47; I 2 = 93%), although morphine consumption did not differ significantly between the groups (SMD, 0.25; 95% CI: -0.83, 1.33; I 2 = 93%). The no-tourniquet group had significantly greater thigh (SMD, -0.46; 95% CI: -0.79, -0.14; I 2 = 36%) and calf (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI: -0.49, -0.03; I 2 = 70%) circumferences postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tourniquet use during ACLR did not significantly impact intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin levels, or surgery time but was associated with increased postoperative pain. The use of epinephrine solution may be a viable alternative to the use of a tourniquet to improve visualization.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2197-2207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00792\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00792","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Tourniquet Use on Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament tears are a common injury that is often treated with arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This meta-analysis investigates the impact of tourniquet use on ACLR and the outcomes of this procedure.
Methods: Searches were conducted across 4 databases: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklist. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between patients who underwent ACLR with versus without a tourniquet.
Results: Eight studies were eligible for systematic review; of these, 6 were eligible for meta-analysis. The CONSORT scores for the studies ranged from 22 to 37. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss (standardized mean difference, with versus without a tourniquet [SMD], -2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.87, 1.58; I 2 = 99%), surgery time (SMD, -0.57; 95% CI: -1.32, 0.18; I 2 = 94%), or Lysholm knee scores after 1 year (SMD, -0.06; 95% CI: -0.33, 0.21; I 2 = 0%). The quality of the arthroscopic visual field varied across the studies. Postoperative pain levels were significantly higher in the tourniquet group (SMD 6-hour follow-up , 1.77; 95% CI: 0.07, 3.47; I 2 = 93%), although morphine consumption did not differ significantly between the groups (SMD, 0.25; 95% CI: -0.83, 1.33; I 2 = 93%). The no-tourniquet group had significantly greater thigh (SMD, -0.46; 95% CI: -0.79, -0.14; I 2 = 36%) and calf (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI: -0.49, -0.03; I 2 = 70%) circumferences postoperatively.
Conclusions: Tourniquet use during ACLR did not significantly impact intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin levels, or surgery time but was associated with increased postoperative pain. The use of epinephrine solution may be a viable alternative to the use of a tourniquet to improve visualization.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
