Mehdi El Hassani, Daniel J G Thirion, Amélie Marsot
{"title":"小型真实世界数据集与大型虚拟数据集的群体药代动力学模型评估:样本量是否影响决策?","authors":"Mehdi El Hassani, Daniel J G Thirion, Amélie Marsot","doi":"10.1007/s13318-025-00960-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>In a recent simulation-based study, we found that sample size had minimal influence on the external evaluation of population pharmacokinetic (PK) models. However, the applicability of these findings to clinical data remains unexplored. This study aims to validate our previous simulation-based results using real-world clinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a prospective clinical study in the > 75-year-old population admitted to the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) receiving piperacillin/tazobactam were collected. A virtual population of 1000 patients representative of the characteristics of MUHC patients was also simulated. A population PK model was externally evaluated both using the small clinical dataset and a larger simulated dataset. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using bias, imprecision, goodness-of-fit plots (GOF), and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPC). The distribution of prediction errors between the clinical and simulated datasets was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 13 patients undergoing piperacillin/tazobactam therapy were collected. The Ishihara et al. model showed low bias (2.4% population, 0.5% individual) and imprecision (23.8% and 3.2%) and was therefore chosen for Monte Carlo simulation of the virtual population. The Hemmersbach-Miller et al. model showed bias values of - 37.8% (population) and - 21.4% (individual), with imprecision values of 43.2% (population) and 31.3% (individual) for the clinical dataset. For the simulated population, bias values were - 28.4% (population) and - 13.9% (individual), with imprecision values of 40.2% (population) and 18.1% (individual). No significant difference was observed between the prediction error distributions of the clinical and simulated datasets. Both GOF plots and pcVPCs showed similar model misspecification across the clinical and simulated datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms that small clinical datasets may be used to externally evaluate population PK models.</p>","PeriodicalId":11939,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"441-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population Pharmacokinetic Model Evaluation with a Small Real-World Dataset Versus a Large Virtual Dataset: Does Sample Size Affect Decision-Making?\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi El Hassani, Daniel J G Thirion, Amélie Marsot\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13318-025-00960-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>In a recent simulation-based study, we found that sample size had minimal influence on the external evaluation of population pharmacokinetic (PK) models. However, the applicability of these findings to clinical data remains unexplored. This study aims to validate our previous simulation-based results using real-world clinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a prospective clinical study in the > 75-year-old population admitted to the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) receiving piperacillin/tazobactam were collected. A virtual population of 1000 patients representative of the characteristics of MUHC patients was also simulated. A population PK model was externally evaluated both using the small clinical dataset and a larger simulated dataset. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using bias, imprecision, goodness-of-fit plots (GOF), and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPC). The distribution of prediction errors between the clinical and simulated datasets was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 13 patients undergoing piperacillin/tazobactam therapy were collected. The Ishihara et al. model showed low bias (2.4% population, 0.5% individual) and imprecision (23.8% and 3.2%) and was therefore chosen for Monte Carlo simulation of the virtual population. The Hemmersbach-Miller et al. model showed bias values of - 37.8% (population) and - 21.4% (individual), with imprecision values of 43.2% (population) and 31.3% (individual) for the clinical dataset. For the simulated population, bias values were - 28.4% (population) and - 13.9% (individual), with imprecision values of 40.2% (population) and 18.1% (individual). No significant difference was observed between the prediction error distributions of the clinical and simulated datasets. Both GOF plots and pcVPCs showed similar model misspecification across the clinical and simulated datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms that small clinical datasets may be used to externally evaluate population PK models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"441-445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-025-00960-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-025-00960-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Population Pharmacokinetic Model Evaluation with a Small Real-World Dataset Versus a Large Virtual Dataset: Does Sample Size Affect Decision-Making?
Background and objective: In a recent simulation-based study, we found that sample size had minimal influence on the external evaluation of population pharmacokinetic (PK) models. However, the applicability of these findings to clinical data remains unexplored. This study aims to validate our previous simulation-based results using real-world clinical data.
Methods: Data from a prospective clinical study in the > 75-year-old population admitted to the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) receiving piperacillin/tazobactam were collected. A virtual population of 1000 patients representative of the characteristics of MUHC patients was also simulated. A population PK model was externally evaluated both using the small clinical dataset and a larger simulated dataset. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using bias, imprecision, goodness-of-fit plots (GOF), and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPC). The distribution of prediction errors between the clinical and simulated datasets was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Results: Data from 13 patients undergoing piperacillin/tazobactam therapy were collected. The Ishihara et al. model showed low bias (2.4% population, 0.5% individual) and imprecision (23.8% and 3.2%) and was therefore chosen for Monte Carlo simulation of the virtual population. The Hemmersbach-Miller et al. model showed bias values of - 37.8% (population) and - 21.4% (individual), with imprecision values of 43.2% (population) and 31.3% (individual) for the clinical dataset. For the simulated population, bias values were - 28.4% (population) and - 13.9% (individual), with imprecision values of 40.2% (population) and 18.1% (individual). No significant difference was observed between the prediction error distributions of the clinical and simulated datasets. Both GOF plots and pcVPCs showed similar model misspecification across the clinical and simulated datasets.
Conclusions: This study confirms that small clinical datasets may be used to externally evaluate population PK models.
期刊介绍:
Hepatology International is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal focuses mainly on new and emerging diagnostic and treatment options, protocols and molecular and cellular basis of disease pathogenesis, new technologies, in liver and biliary sciences.
Hepatology International publishes original research articles related to clinical care and basic research; review articles; consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment; invited editorials, and controversies in contemporary issues. The journal does not publish case reports.