预防经济学和护理质量:来自欧盟应对COVID-19的政策见解。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
John Yfantopoulos, Athanasios Chantzaras
{"title":"预防经济学和护理质量:来自欧盟应对COVID-19的政策见解。","authors":"John Yfantopoulos, Athanasios Chantzaras","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2542294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prevention and quality of care are increasingly recognized as fundamental drivers of sustainable, high-performing health systems. Both have demonstrated cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits, yet remain underfunded and fragmented across many European Union Member States. The COVID-19 pandemic offered a natural stress test, revealing significant variation in investment patterns, system responsiveness, and outcome efficiency.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article integrates economic theory, empirical evidence, and policy analysis to explore how prevention and quality jointly shape system value. It includes analyses of prevention expenditure trends, elasticity to GDP and health spending, and cross-country efficiency indicators across EU Member States (2019-2022). The findings draw from Eurostat data and a targeted review of economic literature on cost-effectiveness and value-based care.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Empirical results confirm that prevention is income- and budget-elastic, but efficiency and impact depend on institutional capacity and governance. The underuse of economic tools in quality planning and prevention prioritization hampers performance. Embedding efficiency metrics, dynamic modeling, and performance-based allocation into policy frameworks is essential to enhance value and resilience. In the coming years, prevention and quality should be better embedded in fiscal planning and system performance, not just as public health imperatives - but as economic necessities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1129-1142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economics of prevention and quality of care: policy insights from the EU's COVID-19 response.\",\"authors\":\"John Yfantopoulos, Athanasios Chantzaras\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2542294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prevention and quality of care are increasingly recognized as fundamental drivers of sustainable, high-performing health systems. Both have demonstrated cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits, yet remain underfunded and fragmented across many European Union Member States. The COVID-19 pandemic offered a natural stress test, revealing significant variation in investment patterns, system responsiveness, and outcome efficiency.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article integrates economic theory, empirical evidence, and policy analysis to explore how prevention and quality jointly shape system value. It includes analyses of prevention expenditure trends, elasticity to GDP and health spending, and cross-country efficiency indicators across EU Member States (2019-2022). The findings draw from Eurostat data and a targeted review of economic literature on cost-effectiveness and value-based care.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Empirical results confirm that prevention is income- and budget-elastic, but efficiency and impact depend on institutional capacity and governance. The underuse of economic tools in quality planning and prevention prioritization hampers performance. Embedding efficiency metrics, dynamic modeling, and performance-based allocation into policy frameworks is essential to enhance value and resilience. In the coming years, prevention and quality should be better embedded in fiscal planning and system performance, not just as public health imperatives - but as economic necessities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1129-1142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2542294\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2542294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:预防和保健质量日益被认为是可持续、高效的卫生系统的基本驱动因素。两者都显示出成本效益和长期效益,但在许多欧洲联盟成员国中仍然资金不足和分散。2019冠状病毒病大流行提供了一个自然的压力测试,揭示了投资模式、系统响应能力和结果效率的显著差异。涵盖领域:本文将经济理论、经验证据和政策分析相结合,探讨预防和质量如何共同塑造系统价值。它包括对预防支出趋势、GDP和卫生支出弹性以及欧盟成员国(2019-2022年)的跨国效率指标的分析。研究结果来自欧盟统计局的数据和对成本效益和基于价值的护理的经济文献的有针对性的审查。专家意见:实证结果证实,预防具有收入和预算弹性,但效率和影响取决于机构能力和治理。在质量规划和预防优先次序方面经济工具的使用不足阻碍了绩效。在政策框架中嵌入效率指标、动态建模和基于绩效的分配,对于提高价值和弹性至关重要。在未来几年,预防和质量应更好地纳入财政规划和系统绩效,不仅是公共卫生的当务之急,而且是经济的必需品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The economics of prevention and quality of care: policy insights from the EU's COVID-19 response.

Introduction: Prevention and quality of care are increasingly recognized as fundamental drivers of sustainable, high-performing health systems. Both have demonstrated cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits, yet remain underfunded and fragmented across many European Union Member States. The COVID-19 pandemic offered a natural stress test, revealing significant variation in investment patterns, system responsiveness, and outcome efficiency.

Areas covered: This article integrates economic theory, empirical evidence, and policy analysis to explore how prevention and quality jointly shape system value. It includes analyses of prevention expenditure trends, elasticity to GDP and health spending, and cross-country efficiency indicators across EU Member States (2019-2022). The findings draw from Eurostat data and a targeted review of economic literature on cost-effectiveness and value-based care.

Expert opinion: Empirical results confirm that prevention is income- and budget-elastic, but efficiency and impact depend on institutional capacity and governance. The underuse of economic tools in quality planning and prevention prioritization hampers performance. Embedding efficiency metrics, dynamic modeling, and performance-based allocation into policy frameworks is essential to enhance value and resilience. In the coming years, prevention and quality should be better embedded in fiscal planning and system performance, not just as public health imperatives - but as economic necessities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信