Madeleine Capiau, David Buetti, Jean Macq, Sophie Thunus
{"title":"社区卫生中心专业人员对评估的实践与认知:一项质性研究","authors":"Madeleine Capiau, David Buetti, Jean Macq, Sophie Thunus","doi":"10.1111/jep.70179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Evaluation plays a critical role in improving the quality and efficiency of services in multidisciplinary primary care organizations, such as community health centers. Despite growing interest in developing tailored evaluation theories for multidisciplinary primary care non-profit organizations, little is known about how evaluation is practiced and perceived by professionals in community health centers. This paper explores both evaluation practices and professionals' perspectives in Belgian community health centers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 professionals from 12 Belgian community health centers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results highlight the complementarity of formal and informal evaluation practices in understanding how evaluation is conducted and used in community health centers. The results highlighted how conflicting considerations regarding relevance, utility, and feasibility that arise in formal evaluation practices lead community health centers to informal evaluation practices. Professionals perceive informal evaluation practices as more aligned with the values of community health centers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These results highlight the need to adopt a hybrid approach to evaluation, which combines formal and informal practices in a complementary rather than opposing manner. Drawing inspiration from care ethics embedded in informal practices could help reimagine formal evaluation practices in a more human-centered and context-sensitive way.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70179","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practices and Perceptions of Community Health Centres Professionals Toward Evaluation: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine Capiau, David Buetti, Jean Macq, Sophie Thunus\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Evaluation plays a critical role in improving the quality and efficiency of services in multidisciplinary primary care organizations, such as community health centers. Despite growing interest in developing tailored evaluation theories for multidisciplinary primary care non-profit organizations, little is known about how evaluation is practiced and perceived by professionals in community health centers. This paper explores both evaluation practices and professionals' perspectives in Belgian community health centers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 professionals from 12 Belgian community health centers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results highlight the complementarity of formal and informal evaluation practices in understanding how evaluation is conducted and used in community health centers. The results highlighted how conflicting considerations regarding relevance, utility, and feasibility that arise in formal evaluation practices lead community health centers to informal evaluation practices. Professionals perceive informal evaluation practices as more aligned with the values of community health centers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results highlight the need to adopt a hybrid approach to evaluation, which combines formal and informal practices in a complementary rather than opposing manner. Drawing inspiration from care ethics embedded in informal practices could help reimagine formal evaluation practices in a more human-centered and context-sensitive way.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70179\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Practices and Perceptions of Community Health Centres Professionals Toward Evaluation: A Qualitative Study
Background and Objective
Evaluation plays a critical role in improving the quality and efficiency of services in multidisciplinary primary care organizations, such as community health centers. Despite growing interest in developing tailored evaluation theories for multidisciplinary primary care non-profit organizations, little is known about how evaluation is practiced and perceived by professionals in community health centers. This paper explores both evaluation practices and professionals' perspectives in Belgian community health centers.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 professionals from 12 Belgian community health centers.
Results
The results highlight the complementarity of formal and informal evaluation practices in understanding how evaluation is conducted and used in community health centers. The results highlighted how conflicting considerations regarding relevance, utility, and feasibility that arise in formal evaluation practices lead community health centers to informal evaluation practices. Professionals perceive informal evaluation practices as more aligned with the values of community health centers.
Conclusion
These results highlight the need to adopt a hybrid approach to evaluation, which combines formal and informal practices in a complementary rather than opposing manner. Drawing inspiration from care ethics embedded in informal practices could help reimagine formal evaluation practices in a more human-centered and context-sensitive way.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.