Meriem Touhami, Zaka Ur Rehman, Md Jahid Hasan, Mohammad Faizal Ahmad Fauzi, Sarina Binti Mansor
{"title":"使用多分辨率深度学习技术的组织病理学图像增强","authors":"Meriem Touhami, Zaka Ur Rehman, Md Jahid Hasan, Mohammad Faizal Ahmad Fauzi, Sarina Binti Mansor","doi":"10.1049/ipr2.70166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate analysis of histopathology images is essential for disease diagnosis and treatment planning. However, the quality of digital pathology slides is often limited by scanner resolution, which can compromise diagnostic precision and patient care. To address this challenge, we conducted a comparative study evaluating four state of the art image enhancement methods: real enhanced super resolution generative adversarial network (Real-ESRGAN), SwinIR, multi scale image restoration network v2 (MIRNet-v2) and super resolution CNN (SRCNN). Our assessment focused on both quantitative metrics peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM) and qualitative visual analysis to evaluate detail preservation. The experimental results revealed that SwinIR achieved the best quantitative performance among all evaluated methods, attaining the highest PSNR (35.81) and SSIM (0.95) for lung images from the LC2500 dataset at a 2 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <annotation>$\\times$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> upscaling factor. In contrast, real-ESRGAN excelled in perceptual quality, preserving finer image details more effectively, though it recorded slightly lower numerical scores (PSNR: 33.53, SSIM: 0.92) on the same dataset. These outcomes highlight essential trade off between perceptual fidelity and reconstruction quality, indicating that the optimal choice of enhancement method may vary depending on clinical or diagnostic priorities. The MIRNetv2 method delivered reasonable performance but ranked below both real-ESRGAN and SwinIR. Specifically, it achieved PSNR/SSIM scores of 30.67/0.94 on PR-IHC patches, 32.90/0.95 on lung images, and 31.87/0.95 on colon images, while scoring 29.11 for PR-IHC images in a separate evaluation. SRCNN demonstrated a balanced performance across datasets, achieving PSNR/SSIM values of 31.45/0.88 for lung images, 30.76/0.87 for PR-IHC patches, 32.62/0.93 for colon images, and 33.76/0.91 for PR-IHC. These findings underscore the real ESRGAN as the most effective method for improving the resolution and quality of histopathology images, supporting its potential integration into digital pathology workflows to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56303,"journal":{"name":"IET Image Processing","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/ipr2.70166","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histopathology Image Enhancement Using Multi-Resolution Deep Learning Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Meriem Touhami, Zaka Ur Rehman, Md Jahid Hasan, Mohammad Faizal Ahmad Fauzi, Sarina Binti Mansor\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/ipr2.70166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate analysis of histopathology images is essential for disease diagnosis and treatment planning. However, the quality of digital pathology slides is often limited by scanner resolution, which can compromise diagnostic precision and patient care. To address this challenge, we conducted a comparative study evaluating four state of the art image enhancement methods: real enhanced super resolution generative adversarial network (Real-ESRGAN), SwinIR, multi scale image restoration network v2 (MIRNet-v2) and super resolution CNN (SRCNN). Our assessment focused on both quantitative metrics peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM) and qualitative visual analysis to evaluate detail preservation. The experimental results revealed that SwinIR achieved the best quantitative performance among all evaluated methods, attaining the highest PSNR (35.81) and SSIM (0.95) for lung images from the LC2500 dataset at a 2 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <annotation>$\\\\times$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> upscaling factor. In contrast, real-ESRGAN excelled in perceptual quality, preserving finer image details more effectively, though it recorded slightly lower numerical scores (PSNR: 33.53, SSIM: 0.92) on the same dataset. These outcomes highlight essential trade off between perceptual fidelity and reconstruction quality, indicating that the optimal choice of enhancement method may vary depending on clinical or diagnostic priorities. The MIRNetv2 method delivered reasonable performance but ranked below both real-ESRGAN and SwinIR. Specifically, it achieved PSNR/SSIM scores of 30.67/0.94 on PR-IHC patches, 32.90/0.95 on lung images, and 31.87/0.95 on colon images, while scoring 29.11 for PR-IHC images in a separate evaluation. SRCNN demonstrated a balanced performance across datasets, achieving PSNR/SSIM values of 31.45/0.88 for lung images, 30.76/0.87 for PR-IHC patches, 32.62/0.93 for colon images, and 33.76/0.91 for PR-IHC. These findings underscore the real ESRGAN as the most effective method for improving the resolution and quality of histopathology images, supporting its potential integration into digital pathology workflows to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Image Processing\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/ipr2.70166\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Image Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/ipr2.70166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Image Processing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/ipr2.70166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Histopathology Image Enhancement Using Multi-Resolution Deep Learning Techniques
Accurate analysis of histopathology images is essential for disease diagnosis and treatment planning. However, the quality of digital pathology slides is often limited by scanner resolution, which can compromise diagnostic precision and patient care. To address this challenge, we conducted a comparative study evaluating four state of the art image enhancement methods: real enhanced super resolution generative adversarial network (Real-ESRGAN), SwinIR, multi scale image restoration network v2 (MIRNet-v2) and super resolution CNN (SRCNN). Our assessment focused on both quantitative metrics peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM) and qualitative visual analysis to evaluate detail preservation. The experimental results revealed that SwinIR achieved the best quantitative performance among all evaluated methods, attaining the highest PSNR (35.81) and SSIM (0.95) for lung images from the LC2500 dataset at a 2 upscaling factor. In contrast, real-ESRGAN excelled in perceptual quality, preserving finer image details more effectively, though it recorded slightly lower numerical scores (PSNR: 33.53, SSIM: 0.92) on the same dataset. These outcomes highlight essential trade off between perceptual fidelity and reconstruction quality, indicating that the optimal choice of enhancement method may vary depending on clinical or diagnostic priorities. The MIRNetv2 method delivered reasonable performance but ranked below both real-ESRGAN and SwinIR. Specifically, it achieved PSNR/SSIM scores of 30.67/0.94 on PR-IHC patches, 32.90/0.95 on lung images, and 31.87/0.95 on colon images, while scoring 29.11 for PR-IHC images in a separate evaluation. SRCNN demonstrated a balanced performance across datasets, achieving PSNR/SSIM values of 31.45/0.88 for lung images, 30.76/0.87 for PR-IHC patches, 32.62/0.93 for colon images, and 33.76/0.91 for PR-IHC. These findings underscore the real ESRGAN as the most effective method for improving the resolution and quality of histopathology images, supporting its potential integration into digital pathology workflows to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The IET Image Processing journal encompasses research areas related to the generation, processing and communication of visual information. The focus of the journal is the coverage of the latest research results in image and video processing, including image generation and display, enhancement and restoration, segmentation, colour and texture analysis, coding and communication, implementations and architectures as well as innovative applications.
Principal topics include:
Generation and Display - Imaging sensors and acquisition systems, illumination, sampling and scanning, quantization, colour reproduction, image rendering, display and printing systems, evaluation of image quality.
Processing and Analysis - Image enhancement, restoration, segmentation, registration, multispectral, colour and texture processing, multiresolution processing and wavelets, morphological operations, stereoscopic and 3-D processing, motion detection and estimation, video and image sequence processing.
Implementations and Architectures - Image and video processing hardware and software, design and construction, architectures and software, neural, adaptive, and fuzzy processing.
Coding and Transmission - Image and video compression and coding, compression standards, noise modelling, visual information networks, streamed video.
Retrieval and Multimedia - Storage of images and video, database design, image retrieval, video annotation and editing, mixed media incorporating visual information, multimedia systems and applications, image and video watermarking, steganography.
Applications - Innovative application of image and video processing technologies to any field, including life sciences, earth sciences, astronomy, document processing and security.
Current Special Issue Call for Papers:
Evolutionary Computation for Image Processing - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_IPR_CFP_EC.pdf
AI-Powered 3D Vision - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_IPR_CFP_AIPV.pdf
Multidisciplinary advancement of Imaging Technologies: From Medical Diagnostics and Genomics to Cognitive Machine Vision, and Artificial Intelligence - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_IPR_CFP_IST.pdf
Deep Learning for 3D Reconstruction - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_IPR_CFP_DLR.pdf