评估在澳大利亚儿科人群航空医疗服务中引入湿化高流量鼻插管治疗:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Cameron Yap, Adelaide Withers, Nicole Ghedina, Elaine O'Connell
{"title":"评估在澳大利亚儿科人群航空医疗服务中引入湿化高流量鼻插管治疗:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Cameron Yap,&nbsp;Adelaide Withers,&nbsp;Nicole Ghedina,&nbsp;Elaine O'Connell","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Humidified high flow (HHF) oxygen is increasingly used to treat acute respiratory illnesses in children; however, use during aeromedical transfer is not well described.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective cohort study. Children who were transferred from rural locations and were initiated on HHF prior to transfer between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018 were identified from the Royal Flying Doctors Service database. Clinical variables prior to transfer, during flight and after transfer were collected from medical records and flight records. Variables were compared between those who continued and did not receive HHF inflight with Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher's exact test, with a <i>p</i>-value less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 61 cases were included, 29 did not receive HHF inflight, 32 continued HHF inflight. The median age of participants was 8 months (IQR 4). The most common reasons for transfer were bronchiolitis (55%) and pneumonia (33%). Children who had a higher respiratory rate (<i>p</i> = 0.021) or had severe work of breathing were more likely to continue HHF inflight (<i>p</i> = 0.012). Those who continued HHF inflight were more likely to continue HHF therapy in the tertiary hospital (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). There was no difference in hospital length of stay between the two groups and no significant complications associated with HHF use during flight.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study adds to a growing body of literature that the use of HHF during aeromedical transfer is safe and does not lead to increased length of hospital stay.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Introduction of Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy Into an Australian Aeromedical Service Within a Paediatric Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Cameron Yap,&nbsp;Adelaide Withers,&nbsp;Nicole Ghedina,&nbsp;Elaine O'Connell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1742-6723.70105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Humidified high flow (HHF) oxygen is increasingly used to treat acute respiratory illnesses in children; however, use during aeromedical transfer is not well described.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a retrospective cohort study. Children who were transferred from rural locations and were initiated on HHF prior to transfer between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018 were identified from the Royal Flying Doctors Service database. Clinical variables prior to transfer, during flight and after transfer were collected from medical records and flight records. Variables were compared between those who continued and did not receive HHF inflight with Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher's exact test, with a <i>p</i>-value less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 61 cases were included, 29 did not receive HHF inflight, 32 continued HHF inflight. The median age of participants was 8 months (IQR 4). The most common reasons for transfer were bronchiolitis (55%) and pneumonia (33%). Children who had a higher respiratory rate (<i>p</i> = 0.021) or had severe work of breathing were more likely to continue HHF inflight (<i>p</i> = 0.012). Those who continued HHF inflight were more likely to continue HHF therapy in the tertiary hospital (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). There was no difference in hospital length of stay between the two groups and no significant complications associated with HHF use during flight.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study adds to a growing body of literature that the use of HHF during aeromedical transfer is safe and does not lead to increased length of hospital stay.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70105\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

湿化高流量(HHF)氧越来越多地用于治疗儿童急性呼吸系统疾病;然而,在航空医疗转移期间的使用并没有很好地描述。方法回顾性队列研究。从皇家飞行医生服务数据库中确定了2015年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间从农村地区转移并在转移前开始接受HHF治疗的儿童。从医疗记录和飞行记录中收集转移前、飞行期间和转移后的临床变量。继续和未接受HHF飞行组的变量比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和Fisher精确检验,p值< 0.05为有统计学意义。结果共纳入61例,其中29例未接受HHF飞行,32例继续接受HHF飞行。参与者的中位年龄为8个月(IQR 4)。最常见的转移原因是细支气管炎(55%)和肺炎(33%)。呼吸频率较高(p = 0.021)或呼吸工作严重的儿童更有可能继续HHF飞行(p = 0.012)。继续乘坐HHF飞机的患者更有可能在三级医院继续接受HHF治疗(p≤0.001)。两组患者住院时间无差异,飞行期间使用HHF无明显并发症。结论:我们的研究与越来越多的文献表明,在航空医疗转移过程中使用HHF是安全的,不会导致住院时间的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Introduction of Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy Into an Australian Aeromedical Service Within a Paediatric Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction

Humidified high flow (HHF) oxygen is increasingly used to treat acute respiratory illnesses in children; however, use during aeromedical transfer is not well described.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. Children who were transferred from rural locations and were initiated on HHF prior to transfer between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018 were identified from the Royal Flying Doctors Service database. Clinical variables prior to transfer, during flight and after transfer were collected from medical records and flight records. Variables were compared between those who continued and did not receive HHF inflight with Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher's exact test, with a p-value less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Results

A total of 61 cases were included, 29 did not receive HHF inflight, 32 continued HHF inflight. The median age of participants was 8 months (IQR 4). The most common reasons for transfer were bronchiolitis (55%) and pneumonia (33%). Children who had a higher respiratory rate (p = 0.021) or had severe work of breathing were more likely to continue HHF inflight (p = 0.012). Those who continued HHF inflight were more likely to continue HHF therapy in the tertiary hospital (p ≤ 0.001). There was no difference in hospital length of stay between the two groups and no significant complications associated with HHF use during flight.

Conclusion

Our study adds to a growing body of literature that the use of HHF during aeromedical transfer is safe and does not lead to increased length of hospital stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信