急诊医学病人交接的新模式——解决文化中隐藏的紧张关系

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Stella H. Yiu, Marianne Yeung, Warren Cheung, Edmund Kwok, Gurraman Mann, Allison Williams, Jason R. Frank
{"title":"急诊医学病人交接的新模式——解决文化中隐藏的紧张关系","authors":"Stella H. Yiu,&nbsp;Marianne Yeung,&nbsp;Warren Cheung,&nbsp;Edmund Kwok,&nbsp;Gurraman Mann,&nbsp;Allison Williams,&nbsp;Jason R. Frank","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical handover (or handoff), the transfer of patient care between providers, is essential in Emergency Medicine. Poor communication during handover can threaten patient safety. Existing literature views handover as an information transfer; little research has examined the human interaction within handover and how it affects patient safety. We sought a more nuanced understanding of handover to improve this critical aspect of Emergency Medicine care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used constructivist grounded theory to explore handover as a social phenomenon. We invited staff emergency physicians in an academic, tertiary care hospital to participate in semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, de-identified, and transcribed. The research team analyzed the transcripts in multiple progressively interpretive analytical stages: initial, focused, and theoretical. Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) provided a framework for our data analysis. CHAT situates an individual's action into an activity system in which components interact, producing tensions. We sought to attain theoretical sufficiency by revising the interview guide and recruiting participants for specific insights.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We interviewed sixteen (16) participants. During handover, the object was for the incoming physician (IP) to accept the handover plan from the outgoing physician (OP). We identified a rule requiring minimal handover plans that were realistic and dichotomous. The divisions of labor were tasks. During the interaction, emotional reactions such as judgment or compassion, and behavioral reactions such as pushback or acceptance could have resulted. There were unintended consequences from the handover process that impacted members' self-worth and generated threats to patient safety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We built a novel and more nuanced framework of handover in the emergency department that involves multiple interactions and tensions. Using this new model, emergency departments should adjust their handover processes to enhance group dynamics and patient safety.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Model of Patient Handover in Emergency Medicine—Addressing Hidden Tensions in Culture\",\"authors\":\"Stella H. Yiu,&nbsp;Marianne Yeung,&nbsp;Warren Cheung,&nbsp;Edmund Kwok,&nbsp;Gurraman Mann,&nbsp;Allison Williams,&nbsp;Jason R. Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.70087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical handover (or handoff), the transfer of patient care between providers, is essential in Emergency Medicine. Poor communication during handover can threaten patient safety. Existing literature views handover as an information transfer; little research has examined the human interaction within handover and how it affects patient safety. We sought a more nuanced understanding of handover to improve this critical aspect of Emergency Medicine care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used constructivist grounded theory to explore handover as a social phenomenon. We invited staff emergency physicians in an academic, tertiary care hospital to participate in semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, de-identified, and transcribed. The research team analyzed the transcripts in multiple progressively interpretive analytical stages: initial, focused, and theoretical. Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) provided a framework for our data analysis. CHAT situates an individual's action into an activity system in which components interact, producing tensions. We sought to attain theoretical sufficiency by revising the interview guide and recruiting participants for specific insights.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We interviewed sixteen (16) participants. During handover, the object was for the incoming physician (IP) to accept the handover plan from the outgoing physician (OP). We identified a rule requiring minimal handover plans that were realistic and dichotomous. The divisions of labor were tasks. During the interaction, emotional reactions such as judgment or compassion, and behavioral reactions such as pushback or acceptance could have resulted. There were unintended consequences from the handover process that impacted members' self-worth and generated threats to patient safety.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We built a novel and more nuanced framework of handover in the emergency department that involves multiple interactions and tensions. Using this new model, emergency departments should adjust their handover processes to enhance group dynamics and patient safety.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70087\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床交接(或移交),病人护理的提供者之间的转移,是必不可少的急诊医学。交接过程中沟通不畅会威胁患者安全。现有文献认为交接是一种信息传递;很少有研究调查交接过程中的人际互动以及它如何影响患者安全。我们寻求对交接更细致入微的理解,以改善急诊医学护理的这一关键方面。方法运用建构主义理论对移交这一社会现象进行探讨。我们邀请了一家三级专科医院的急诊医生参加了半结构化访谈,并对访谈进行了记录、去识别和转录。研究小组在多个渐进的解释分析阶段对转录本进行了分析:初始阶段、重点阶段和理论阶段。文化历史活动理论(CHAT)为我们的数据分析提供了一个框架。CHAT将一个人的行为置于一个活动系统中,在这个系统中,各个组成部分相互作用,产生紧张感。我们试图通过修改面试指南和招募参与者来获得具体的见解,从而达到理论的充分性。结果我们采访了16名参与者。在交接过程中,目标是让即将入职的医生(IP)接受即将离职的医生(OP)的交接计划。我们确定了一个规则,要求最小的移交计划,这是现实的和二分的。劳动分工就是任务。在互动过程中,可能会产生诸如判断或同情之类的情绪反应,以及诸如排斥或接受之类的行为反应。交接过程中出现了意想不到的后果,影响了成员的自我价值,并对患者安全产生了威胁。我们在急诊科建立了一个新的、更细致的交接框架,涉及多种互动和紧张关系。利用这种新模式,急诊科应调整交接流程,以增强群体动力和患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Novel Model of Patient Handover in Emergency Medicine—Addressing Hidden Tensions in Culture

A Novel Model of Patient Handover in Emergency Medicine—Addressing Hidden Tensions in Culture

Introduction

Clinical handover (or handoff), the transfer of patient care between providers, is essential in Emergency Medicine. Poor communication during handover can threaten patient safety. Existing literature views handover as an information transfer; little research has examined the human interaction within handover and how it affects patient safety. We sought a more nuanced understanding of handover to improve this critical aspect of Emergency Medicine care.

Methods

We used constructivist grounded theory to explore handover as a social phenomenon. We invited staff emergency physicians in an academic, tertiary care hospital to participate in semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, de-identified, and transcribed. The research team analyzed the transcripts in multiple progressively interpretive analytical stages: initial, focused, and theoretical. Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) provided a framework for our data analysis. CHAT situates an individual's action into an activity system in which components interact, producing tensions. We sought to attain theoretical sufficiency by revising the interview guide and recruiting participants for specific insights.

Results

We interviewed sixteen (16) participants. During handover, the object was for the incoming physician (IP) to accept the handover plan from the outgoing physician (OP). We identified a rule requiring minimal handover plans that were realistic and dichotomous. The divisions of labor were tasks. During the interaction, emotional reactions such as judgment or compassion, and behavioral reactions such as pushback or acceptance could have resulted. There were unintended consequences from the handover process that impacted members' self-worth and generated threats to patient safety.

Conclusions

We built a novel and more nuanced framework of handover in the emergency department that involves multiple interactions and tensions. Using this new model, emergency departments should adjust their handover processes to enhance group dynamics and patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信