简·奥斯汀和欧文·戈夫曼的表情游戏:“家庭和关系”vs“孤独的狂热者”

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Richard Handler
{"title":"简·奥斯汀和欧文·戈夫曼的表情游戏:“家庭和关系”vs“孤独的狂热者”","authors":"Richard Handler","doi":"10.1111/anhu.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper brings together two brilliant analysts of social encounters, Jane Austen and Erving Goffman. It proceeds by applying some of Goffman's terms for face-to-face interactions to several scenes from Austen's novels in which characters try to extract information from others while preventing others from extracting information from them. In their treatment of these “expression games,” both authors display a similar sociological sensibility. They differ, however, in their treatment of the individual in relation to society; for Austen, an individual can never be viewed apart from family and connections, while for Goffman, the individual is in and of itself a sacred social entity.</p>","PeriodicalId":53597,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Humanism","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anhu.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expression games in Jane Austen and Erving Goffman: “Family and connections” versus “solitary cultish men”\",\"authors\":\"Richard Handler\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anhu.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper brings together two brilliant analysts of social encounters, Jane Austen and Erving Goffman. It proceeds by applying some of Goffman's terms for face-to-face interactions to several scenes from Austen's novels in which characters try to extract information from others while preventing others from extracting information from them. In their treatment of these “expression games,” both authors display a similar sociological sensibility. They differ, however, in their treatment of the individual in relation to society; for Austen, an individual can never be viewed apart from family and connections, while for Goffman, the individual is in and of itself a sacred social entity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology and Humanism\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anhu.70009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology and Humanism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anhu.70009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Humanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anhu.70009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文汇集了两位杰出的社会交往分析家,简·奥斯汀和欧文·戈夫曼。本文将戈夫曼关于面对面互动的一些术语应用于奥斯汀小说中的几个场景,在这些场景中,人物试图从他人那里获取信息,同时阻止他人从他们那里获取信息。在处理这些“表情游戏”时,两位作者都表现出了类似的社会学敏感性。然而,他们在对待个人与社会的关系方面有所不同;对奥斯汀来说,个人永远不能脱离家庭和关系来看待,而对戈夫曼来说,个人本身就是一个神圣的社会实体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Expression games in Jane Austen and Erving Goffman: “Family and connections” versus “solitary cultish men”

Expression games in Jane Austen and Erving Goffman: “Family and connections” versus “solitary cultish men”

Expression games in Jane Austen and Erving Goffman: “Family and connections” versus “solitary cultish men”

Expression games in Jane Austen and Erving Goffman: “Family and connections” versus “solitary cultish men”

This paper brings together two brilliant analysts of social encounters, Jane Austen and Erving Goffman. It proceeds by applying some of Goffman's terms for face-to-face interactions to several scenes from Austen's novels in which characters try to extract information from others while preventing others from extracting information from them. In their treatment of these “expression games,” both authors display a similar sociological sensibility. They differ, however, in their treatment of the individual in relation to society; for Austen, an individual can never be viewed apart from family and connections, while for Goffman, the individual is in and of itself a sacred social entity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropology and Humanism
Anthropology and Humanism Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信