共享弱点:从普通伦理学的视角重新思考人类学中的特权与团结

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Pascale Schild
{"title":"共享弱点:从普通伦理学的视角重新思考人类学中的特权与团结","authors":"Pascale Schild","doi":"10.1111/anhu.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While engaged anthropology foregrounds the privilege and ethical responsibility of researchers toward interlocutors suffering all forms of oppression, anthropologists' own vulnerabilities and troubling experiences of violence tend to be ignored and silenced. This silencing is due to the prevailing heroic image of the politically engaged anthropologist, despite longstanding critiques from feminist and decolonial scholarship. In this article, I discuss my witnessing of the violent death of an interlocutor in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir. I propose to think of vulnerabilities as diverse yet shared human experiences to explore the epistemological and political potential of researchers' vulnerabilities for understanding and practicing solidarities in ethnographic fieldwork. Building on the perspective of “ordinary ethics,” I focus on the everyday exchanges of care and support that can emerge from the intricate entanglements of anthropologists' exposure to violence with the vulnerabilities and struggles of the people with whom they work.</p>","PeriodicalId":53597,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Humanism","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anhu.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics\",\"authors\":\"Pascale Schild\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anhu.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While engaged anthropology foregrounds the privilege and ethical responsibility of researchers toward interlocutors suffering all forms of oppression, anthropologists' own vulnerabilities and troubling experiences of violence tend to be ignored and silenced. This silencing is due to the prevailing heroic image of the politically engaged anthropologist, despite longstanding critiques from feminist and decolonial scholarship. In this article, I discuss my witnessing of the violent death of an interlocutor in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir. I propose to think of vulnerabilities as diverse yet shared human experiences to explore the epistemological and political potential of researchers' vulnerabilities for understanding and practicing solidarities in ethnographic fieldwork. Building on the perspective of “ordinary ethics,” I focus on the everyday exchanges of care and support that can emerge from the intricate entanglements of anthropologists' exposure to violence with the vulnerabilities and struggles of the people with whom they work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology and Humanism\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anhu.70012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology and Humanism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anhu.70012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Humanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anhu.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然参与人类学强调了研究人员对遭受各种形式压迫的对话者的特权和道德责任,但人类学家自己的脆弱性和令人不安的暴力经历往往被忽视和沉默。这种沉默是由于人类学家在政治上的英雄形象盛行,尽管女权主义者和非殖民学者长期以来一直批评。在这篇文章中,我将讨论我在巴基斯坦控制的克什米尔目睹的一位对话者的暴力死亡。我建议将脆弱性视为多样但共享的人类经验,以探索研究人员脆弱性的认识论和政治潜力,以便在民族志田野调查中理解和实践团结。从“普通伦理”的角度出发,我将重点放在日常关怀和支持的交流上,这些交流可能来自人类学家对暴力的暴露与他们所研究的对象的脆弱性和挣扎之间错综复杂的纠缠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics

Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics

Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics

Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics

While engaged anthropology foregrounds the privilege and ethical responsibility of researchers toward interlocutors suffering all forms of oppression, anthropologists' own vulnerabilities and troubling experiences of violence tend to be ignored and silenced. This silencing is due to the prevailing heroic image of the politically engaged anthropologist, despite longstanding critiques from feminist and decolonial scholarship. In this article, I discuss my witnessing of the violent death of an interlocutor in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir. I propose to think of vulnerabilities as diverse yet shared human experiences to explore the epistemological and political potential of researchers' vulnerabilities for understanding and practicing solidarities in ethnographic fieldwork. Building on the perspective of “ordinary ethics,” I focus on the everyday exchanges of care and support that can emerge from the intricate entanglements of anthropologists' exposure to violence with the vulnerabilities and struggles of the people with whom they work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropology and Humanism
Anthropology and Humanism Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信