脊髓性肌萎缩患者鞘内注射皮下系统的手术成功:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Victor M. Lu , Sima Vazquez , Caleigh S. Roach , Toba N. Niazi
{"title":"脊髓性肌萎缩患者鞘内注射皮下系统的手术成功:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Victor M. Lu ,&nbsp;Sima Vazquez ,&nbsp;Caleigh S. Roach ,&nbsp;Toba N. Niazi","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The intrathecal administration of nusinersen to treat spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has demonstrated therapeutic effect, however, repeat lumbar punctures confer multiple disadvantages. As such, subcutaneous systems have been described to provide an alternative, less invasive strategy for repeat administration. Correspondingly this study aimed to aggregate metadata to better define the surgical success of these subcutaneous systems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Searches of multiple electronic databases from inception to March 2025 were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against pre-specified criteria. Quantitative outcomes were pooled by random-effects meta-analyses where possible.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 8 studies describing 74 SMA patients that were managed with a subcutaneous system for intrathecal nusinersen. No official system currently exists for this purpose, and all studies reported off-label use of either an intravascular port (5 of 8 studies) or reservoir system (3 of 8 studies) as the subcutaneous port. These ports were located mostly in the lateral flank (5 of 8 studies). In terms of intrathecal access, a hemilaminotomy was used universally in most studies (6 of 8 studies), and access was obtained most commonly in the thoracolumbar region (3 of 8 studies). A total of 22 individual adverse events were reported amongst the cohort, the most common being cerebrospinal fluid leak needing intervention (7/74, 9 %). The pooled estimate by meta-analysis indicated an overall weighted rate of adverse events to be 27 % (95 % CI 16–40 %). Eight patients required revision surgery, with a pooled revision surgery rate estimate of 9 % (95 % CI 2–19 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Subcutaneous systems can be used in the setting of SMA for repeat nusinersen administration. There exists no consensus system or surgical approach currently, with multiple systems, port types, port location, intrathecal access techniques and intrathecal access locations reported. Future multidisciplinary efforts are needed to elevate the concept of subcutaneous delivery systems for SMA towards convention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 109085"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical success of subcutaneous systems for intrathecal nusinersen delivery in spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Victor M. Lu ,&nbsp;Sima Vazquez ,&nbsp;Caleigh S. Roach ,&nbsp;Toba N. Niazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The intrathecal administration of nusinersen to treat spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has demonstrated therapeutic effect, however, repeat lumbar punctures confer multiple disadvantages. As such, subcutaneous systems have been described to provide an alternative, less invasive strategy for repeat administration. Correspondingly this study aimed to aggregate metadata to better define the surgical success of these subcutaneous systems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Searches of multiple electronic databases from inception to March 2025 were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against pre-specified criteria. Quantitative outcomes were pooled by random-effects meta-analyses where possible.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 8 studies describing 74 SMA patients that were managed with a subcutaneous system for intrathecal nusinersen. No official system currently exists for this purpose, and all studies reported off-label use of either an intravascular port (5 of 8 studies) or reservoir system (3 of 8 studies) as the subcutaneous port. These ports were located mostly in the lateral flank (5 of 8 studies). In terms of intrathecal access, a hemilaminotomy was used universally in most studies (6 of 8 studies), and access was obtained most commonly in the thoracolumbar region (3 of 8 studies). A total of 22 individual adverse events were reported amongst the cohort, the most common being cerebrospinal fluid leak needing intervention (7/74, 9 %). The pooled estimate by meta-analysis indicated an overall weighted rate of adverse events to be 27 % (95 % CI 16–40 %). Eight patients required revision surgery, with a pooled revision surgery rate estimate of 9 % (95 % CI 2–19 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Subcutaneous systems can be used in the setting of SMA for repeat nusinersen administration. There exists no consensus system or surgical approach currently, with multiple systems, port types, port location, intrathecal access techniques and intrathecal access locations reported. Future multidisciplinary efforts are needed to elevate the concept of subcutaneous delivery systems for SMA towards convention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725003683\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725003683","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脊髓鞘内注射nusinersen治疗脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)已显示出治疗效果,然而,重复腰椎穿刺会带来多重缺点。因此,皮下系统为重复给药提供了一种替代的、侵入性较小的策略。相应地,本研究旨在汇总元数据,以更好地定义这些皮下系统的手术成功。方法按照PRISMA指南检索从成立到2025年3月的多个电子数据库。文章是根据预先规定的标准进行筛选的。定量结果在可能的情况下通过随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总。结果有8项研究描述了74例SMA患者使用皮下系统进行鞘内注射。目前还没有正式的系统用于此目的,所有的研究都报告了标签外使用血管内端口(8项研究中的5项)或储液系统(8项研究中的3项)作为皮下端口。这些端口主要位于侧腹(8项研究中的5项)。在鞘内通路方面,大多数研究普遍采用半椎板切开术(8项研究中的6项),最常在胸腰椎区域获得通路(8项研究中的3项)。该队列共报告了22例个人不良事件,最常见的是需要干预的脑脊液泄漏(7/ 74,9 %)。荟萃分析的汇总估计表明不良事件的总加权率为27 %(95 % CI 16-40 %)。8例患者需要翻修手术,合并翻修手术率估计为9 %(95 % CI 2-19 %)。结论皮下给药系统可用于SMA患者的重复给药。目前没有共识的系统或手术入路,有多种系统、端口类型、端口位置、鞘内入路技术和鞘内入路位置的报道。未来需要多学科的努力来提升SMA皮下给药系统的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical success of subcutaneous systems for intrathecal nusinersen delivery in spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The intrathecal administration of nusinersen to treat spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has demonstrated therapeutic effect, however, repeat lumbar punctures confer multiple disadvantages. As such, subcutaneous systems have been described to provide an alternative, less invasive strategy for repeat administration. Correspondingly this study aimed to aggregate metadata to better define the surgical success of these subcutaneous systems.

Methods

Searches of multiple electronic databases from inception to March 2025 were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against pre-specified criteria. Quantitative outcomes were pooled by random-effects meta-analyses where possible.

Results

There were 8 studies describing 74 SMA patients that were managed with a subcutaneous system for intrathecal nusinersen. No official system currently exists for this purpose, and all studies reported off-label use of either an intravascular port (5 of 8 studies) or reservoir system (3 of 8 studies) as the subcutaneous port. These ports were located mostly in the lateral flank (5 of 8 studies). In terms of intrathecal access, a hemilaminotomy was used universally in most studies (6 of 8 studies), and access was obtained most commonly in the thoracolumbar region (3 of 8 studies). A total of 22 individual adverse events were reported amongst the cohort, the most common being cerebrospinal fluid leak needing intervention (7/74, 9 %). The pooled estimate by meta-analysis indicated an overall weighted rate of adverse events to be 27 % (95 % CI 16–40 %). Eight patients required revision surgery, with a pooled revision surgery rate estimate of 9 % (95 % CI 2–19 %).

Conclusions

Subcutaneous systems can be used in the setting of SMA for repeat nusinersen administration. There exists no consensus system or surgical approach currently, with multiple systems, port types, port location, intrathecal access techniques and intrathecal access locations reported. Future multidisciplinary efforts are needed to elevate the concept of subcutaneous delivery systems for SMA towards convention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信