节段性肌肉振动对上肢屈肌和伸肌群促进中风后功能恢复的影响:一项随机试验

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION
Muhammad Shahid Shabbir , Aruba Saeed , Sidra Tariq , Naqash Shabbir , Rida Nasir , Huma Riaz
{"title":"节段性肌肉振动对上肢屈肌和伸肌群促进中风后功能恢复的影响:一项随机试验","authors":"Muhammad Shahid Shabbir ,&nbsp;Aruba Saeed ,&nbsp;Sidra Tariq ,&nbsp;Naqash Shabbir ,&nbsp;Rida Nasir ,&nbsp;Huma Riaz","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.07.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Upper limb motor impairment is a common sequela of stroke, often leading to long-term functional limitations. Segmental vibration therapy (SVT) has been proposed to facilitate sensorimotor recovery by enhancing proprioceptive input and cortical excitability. However, its differential effects on upper limb flexor and extensor muscle groups remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to determine the effects of segmental vibration on flexors and extensor muscle groups for upper limb functional ability, recovery, and spasticity in post-stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>This two-arm, parallel-design, double-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at Zohra Institute of Health Sciences. A total of 62 patients were recruited using a non-probability convenience sampling technique and randomized into two groups through an online randomization tool. Group A received low-frequency segmental muscle vibration (41 Hz) applied over the flexor muscles of the upper limb, along with routine physical therapy. Group B received the same vibration frequency applied to the extensor muscles of the upper limb, in addition to routine physical therapy. Stroke patients with spasticity graded 1–3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale and who were 3–6 months post-stroke were included in the study. The intervention lasted for six weeks, comprising 18 sessions (three sessions per week). The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was used to assess upper extremity functional ability, while the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) evaluated motor function. Muscle spasticity was measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and motor recovery stages were assessed via the Brunnstrom scale. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. An independent <em>t</em>-test was used for between-group comparisons, and a paired <em>t</em>-test was applied for within-group analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Post-intervention, WMFT scores improved in Group A (60.93 ± 6.12) compared to Group B (58.45 ± 7.66), though the difference was not statistically significant (<em>p</em> = 0.207). MAS scores decreased in Group A (0.56 ± 0.58) versus Group B (0.72 ± 0.74; <em>p</em> = 0.151). BSMR scores improved in both Group A (4.94 ± 1.19) and Group B (5.25 ± 1.23; <em>p</em> = 0.148). FMA scores increased in Group A (57.41 ± 3.97) compared to Group B (53.61 ± 4.89; <em>p</em> = 0.151). However, none of the between-group differences reached statistical significance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this study suggest that segmental vibration therapy applied to both flexor and extensor muscles effectively improves upper limb function in post-stroke patients. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the effects of vibration therapy on the two muscle groups.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>The trial registration number for this study is NCT05356481. The trial started on May 2, 2022, and was completed on June 30, 2023.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of segmental muscle vibration on flexor and extensor groups of the upper limb in enhancing functional recovery after stroke: A randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Shahid Shabbir ,&nbsp;Aruba Saeed ,&nbsp;Sidra Tariq ,&nbsp;Naqash Shabbir ,&nbsp;Rida Nasir ,&nbsp;Huma Riaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.07.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Upper limb motor impairment is a common sequela of stroke, often leading to long-term functional limitations. Segmental vibration therapy (SVT) has been proposed to facilitate sensorimotor recovery by enhancing proprioceptive input and cortical excitability. However, its differential effects on upper limb flexor and extensor muscle groups remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to determine the effects of segmental vibration on flexors and extensor muscle groups for upper limb functional ability, recovery, and spasticity in post-stroke patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>This two-arm, parallel-design, double-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at Zohra Institute of Health Sciences. A total of 62 patients were recruited using a non-probability convenience sampling technique and randomized into two groups through an online randomization tool. Group A received low-frequency segmental muscle vibration (41 Hz) applied over the flexor muscles of the upper limb, along with routine physical therapy. Group B received the same vibration frequency applied to the extensor muscles of the upper limb, in addition to routine physical therapy. Stroke patients with spasticity graded 1–3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale and who were 3–6 months post-stroke were included in the study. The intervention lasted for six weeks, comprising 18 sessions (three sessions per week). The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was used to assess upper extremity functional ability, while the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) evaluated motor function. Muscle spasticity was measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and motor recovery stages were assessed via the Brunnstrom scale. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. An independent <em>t</em>-test was used for between-group comparisons, and a paired <em>t</em>-test was applied for within-group analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Post-intervention, WMFT scores improved in Group A (60.93 ± 6.12) compared to Group B (58.45 ± 7.66), though the difference was not statistically significant (<em>p</em> = 0.207). MAS scores decreased in Group A (0.56 ± 0.58) versus Group B (0.72 ± 0.74; <em>p</em> = 0.151). BSMR scores improved in both Group A (4.94 ± 1.19) and Group B (5.25 ± 1.23; <em>p</em> = 0.148). FMA scores increased in Group A (57.41 ± 3.97) compared to Group B (53.61 ± 4.89; <em>p</em> = 0.151). However, none of the between-group differences reached statistical significance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this study suggest that segmental vibration therapy applied to both flexor and extensor muscles effectively improves upper limb function in post-stroke patients. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the effects of vibration therapy on the two muscle groups.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>The trial registration number for this study is NCT05356481. The trial started on May 2, 2022, and was completed on June 30, 2023.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225002979\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225002979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:上肢运动障碍是脑卒中的常见后遗症,常导致长期的功能限制。节段性振动疗法(SVT)通过增强本体感觉输入和皮层兴奋性来促进感觉运动恢复。然而,它对上肢屈肌和伸肌群的不同影响仍未得到充分研究。目的本研究的目的是确定节段振动对屈肌和伸肌群对中风后患者上肢功能能力、恢复和痉挛的影响。方法:在Zohra健康科学研究所进行的双臂、平行设计、双盲随机临床试验。采用非概率方便抽样技术共招募了62名患者,并通过在线随机化工具随机分为两组。A组接受上肢屈肌上的低频节段性肌肉振动(41 Hz),并进行常规物理治疗。B组在常规物理治疗的基础上,给予上肢伸肌相同的振动频率。卒中后3-6个月,经改良Ashworth量表评定为1-3级痉挛的卒中患者纳入研究。干预持续了6周,包括18个疗程(每周3次)。采用Wolf运动功能测验(WMFT)评估上肢功能,采用Fugl-Meyer运动功能评估(FMA)评估上肢功能。采用改良Ashworth量表(MAS)测量肌肉痉挛程度,采用Brunnstrom量表评估运动恢复阶段。数据分析采用SPSS 26。组间比较采用独立t检验,组内分析采用配对t检验。结果干预后,A组WMFT评分(60.93±6.12)高于B组(58.45±7.66),差异无统计学意义(p = 0.207)。A组MAS评分(0.56±0.58)低于B组(0.72±0.74);p = 0.151)。BSMR评分A组(4.94±1.19)、B组(5.25±1.23)均有改善;p = 0.148)。FMA评分A组(57.41±3.97)高于B组(53.61±4.89);p = 0.151)。但组间差异均无统计学意义。结论对脑卒中后患者进行屈伸肌节段振动治疗可有效改善上肢功能。然而,振动疗法对两个肌肉群的影响没有统计学上的显著差异。本研究的试验注册号为NCT05356481。试验于2022年5月2日开始,并于2023年6月30日完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of segmental muscle vibration on flexor and extensor groups of the upper limb in enhancing functional recovery after stroke: A randomized trial

Background

Upper limb motor impairment is a common sequela of stroke, often leading to long-term functional limitations. Segmental vibration therapy (SVT) has been proposed to facilitate sensorimotor recovery by enhancing proprioceptive input and cortical excitability. However, its differential effects on upper limb flexor and extensor muscle groups remain underexplored.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of segmental vibration on flexors and extensor muscle groups for upper limb functional ability, recovery, and spasticity in post-stroke patients.

Methodology

This two-arm, parallel-design, double-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at Zohra Institute of Health Sciences. A total of 62 patients were recruited using a non-probability convenience sampling technique and randomized into two groups through an online randomization tool. Group A received low-frequency segmental muscle vibration (41 Hz) applied over the flexor muscles of the upper limb, along with routine physical therapy. Group B received the same vibration frequency applied to the extensor muscles of the upper limb, in addition to routine physical therapy. Stroke patients with spasticity graded 1–3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale and who were 3–6 months post-stroke were included in the study. The intervention lasted for six weeks, comprising 18 sessions (three sessions per week). The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was used to assess upper extremity functional ability, while the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) evaluated motor function. Muscle spasticity was measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and motor recovery stages were assessed via the Brunnstrom scale. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. An independent t-test was used for between-group comparisons, and a paired t-test was applied for within-group analysis.

Results

Post-intervention, WMFT scores improved in Group A (60.93 ± 6.12) compared to Group B (58.45 ± 7.66), though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.207). MAS scores decreased in Group A (0.56 ± 0.58) versus Group B (0.72 ± 0.74; p = 0.151). BSMR scores improved in both Group A (4.94 ± 1.19) and Group B (5.25 ± 1.23; p = 0.148). FMA scores increased in Group A (57.41 ± 3.97) compared to Group B (53.61 ± 4.89; p = 0.151). However, none of the between-group differences reached statistical significance.

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that segmental vibration therapy applied to both flexor and extensor muscles effectively improves upper limb function in post-stroke patients. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the effects of vibration therapy on the two muscle groups.

Trial registration

The trial registration number for this study is NCT05356481. The trial started on May 2, 2022, and was completed on June 30, 2023.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信