老年妇女幸福感的潜在阶层分析。

Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Nancy F Woods, Kenneth C Pike, Andrea Z LaCroix, Oleg Zaslavsky, Adrian Dobra, Marcia L Stefanick, Barbara B Cochrane
{"title":"老年妇女幸福感的潜在阶层分析。","authors":"Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Nancy F Woods, Kenneth C Pike, Andrea Z LaCroix, Oleg Zaslavsky, Adrian Dobra, Marcia L Stefanick, Barbara B Cochrane","doi":"10.1177/15409996251363398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Previous efforts to assess well-being and health focused on individual indicators of hedonic, evaluative, or eudaemonic measures or summated scores reflecting all dimensions. The objectives of this study were to develop profiles that preserve distinct dimensions of hedonic, evaluative, and eudemonic well-being while permitting its exploration as a predictor of health endpoints. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 81,148 Women's Health Initiative (WHI) participants with well-being measures collected in 2011-2012 (mean age = 76.4 years) were included. Women were recruited to the WHI Clinical Trial and Observational Cohort, continued participation in WHI Extensions (2005-2010 and 2010-2015), and completed the 2011-2012 questionnaire. Classes were identified from hedonic (life enjoyment, happiness, life satisfaction, quality of life) and eudaemonic (personal growth, purpose in life, environmental mastery, self-mastery, self-control) measures using latent class analysis. Characteristics were described by classes, and associations with all-cause mortality were examined using logistic regression. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Four well-being classes were identified. Class 2 (17.8%) had the lowest (worst) well-being scores, and class 4 (53.9%) had the highest (best) well-being scores in all dimensions. Class 1 (6.4%) had high hedonic and moderate eudaemonic with low life enjoyment. Class 3 (21.9%) had high hedonic and moderate eudaemonic scores with low self-mastery. Women in class 4 were younger, more educated, reported higher annual incomes, least likely to smoke, and most likely to drink alcohol daily. Relative to class 4, odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of all-cause mortality were 1.33 (1.24-1.43), 1.75 (1.67-1.84), and 1.26 (1.20-1.31) for classes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, even after adjustment for demographic and behavioral confounders. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Latent class analysis identified groups by levels of hedonic and eudaemonic indicators, preserving information about well-being dimensions while supporting interpretation of relationships with well-being important to older women and health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":520699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health (2002)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latent Class Analysis of Well-Being in Older Women.\",\"authors\":\"Eileen Rillamas-Sun, Nancy F Woods, Kenneth C Pike, Andrea Z LaCroix, Oleg Zaslavsky, Adrian Dobra, Marcia L Stefanick, Barbara B Cochrane\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15409996251363398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Previous efforts to assess well-being and health focused on individual indicators of hedonic, evaluative, or eudaemonic measures or summated scores reflecting all dimensions. The objectives of this study were to develop profiles that preserve distinct dimensions of hedonic, evaluative, and eudemonic well-being while permitting its exploration as a predictor of health endpoints. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 81,148 Women's Health Initiative (WHI) participants with well-being measures collected in 2011-2012 (mean age = 76.4 years) were included. Women were recruited to the WHI Clinical Trial and Observational Cohort, continued participation in WHI Extensions (2005-2010 and 2010-2015), and completed the 2011-2012 questionnaire. Classes were identified from hedonic (life enjoyment, happiness, life satisfaction, quality of life) and eudaemonic (personal growth, purpose in life, environmental mastery, self-mastery, self-control) measures using latent class analysis. Characteristics were described by classes, and associations with all-cause mortality were examined using logistic regression. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Four well-being classes were identified. Class 2 (17.8%) had the lowest (worst) well-being scores, and class 4 (53.9%) had the highest (best) well-being scores in all dimensions. Class 1 (6.4%) had high hedonic and moderate eudaemonic with low life enjoyment. Class 3 (21.9%) had high hedonic and moderate eudaemonic scores with low self-mastery. Women in class 4 were younger, more educated, reported higher annual incomes, least likely to smoke, and most likely to drink alcohol daily. Relative to class 4, odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of all-cause mortality were 1.33 (1.24-1.43), 1.75 (1.67-1.84), and 1.26 (1.20-1.31) for classes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, even after adjustment for demographic and behavioral confounders. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Latent class analysis identified groups by levels of hedonic and eudaemonic indicators, preserving information about well-being dimensions while supporting interpretation of relationships with well-being important to older women and health research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health (2002)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251363398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health (2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15409996251363398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以前评估幸福和健康的努力集中在享乐、评估或幸福测量的个人指标或反映所有维度的综合得分上。本研究的目的是建立保持享乐、评估和幸福的不同维度的概况,同时允许其作为健康终点的预测因子进行探索。方法:共纳入2011-2012年收集的81148名妇女健康倡议(WHI)参与者(平均年龄= 76.4岁)。妇女被招募到WHI临床试验和观察队列,继续参与WHI扩展(2005-2010年和2010-2015年),并完成2011-2012年问卷。使用潜在阶级分析,从享乐主义(生活享受、幸福、生活满意度、生活质量)和享乐主义(个人成长、生活目标、环境掌控、自我掌控、自我控制)两方面来确定阶级。特征按类别描述,并使用逻辑回归检查与全因死亡率的关联。结果:确定了四个幸福等级。2班(17.8%)的幸福感得分最低(最差),4班(53.9%)的幸福感得分最高(最好)。第一类(6.4%)为高享乐型,中等享乐型,低生活享受型。3班(21.9%)快乐得分高,快乐得分中等,自我掌握得分低。第4班的女性更年轻,受教育程度更高,年收入更高,吸烟的可能性最小,每天饮酒的可能性最大。相对于第4类,即使在调整了人口统计学和行为混杂因素后,1、2和3类的全因死亡率的优势比(95%置信区间)分别为1.33(1.24-1.43)、1.75(1.67-1.84)和1.26(1.20-1.31)。结论:潜在类别分析通过享乐和幸福指标的水平来确定群体,保留了关于幸福维度的信息,同时支持对老年妇女和健康研究重要的幸福关系的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Latent Class Analysis of Well-Being in Older Women.

Background: Previous efforts to assess well-being and health focused on individual indicators of hedonic, evaluative, or eudaemonic measures or summated scores reflecting all dimensions. The objectives of this study were to develop profiles that preserve distinct dimensions of hedonic, evaluative, and eudemonic well-being while permitting its exploration as a predictor of health endpoints. Methods: A total of 81,148 Women's Health Initiative (WHI) participants with well-being measures collected in 2011-2012 (mean age = 76.4 years) were included. Women were recruited to the WHI Clinical Trial and Observational Cohort, continued participation in WHI Extensions (2005-2010 and 2010-2015), and completed the 2011-2012 questionnaire. Classes were identified from hedonic (life enjoyment, happiness, life satisfaction, quality of life) and eudaemonic (personal growth, purpose in life, environmental mastery, self-mastery, self-control) measures using latent class analysis. Characteristics were described by classes, and associations with all-cause mortality were examined using logistic regression. Results: Four well-being classes were identified. Class 2 (17.8%) had the lowest (worst) well-being scores, and class 4 (53.9%) had the highest (best) well-being scores in all dimensions. Class 1 (6.4%) had high hedonic and moderate eudaemonic with low life enjoyment. Class 3 (21.9%) had high hedonic and moderate eudaemonic scores with low self-mastery. Women in class 4 were younger, more educated, reported higher annual incomes, least likely to smoke, and most likely to drink alcohol daily. Relative to class 4, odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of all-cause mortality were 1.33 (1.24-1.43), 1.75 (1.67-1.84), and 1.26 (1.20-1.31) for classes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, even after adjustment for demographic and behavioral confounders. Conclusion: Latent class analysis identified groups by levels of hedonic and eudaemonic indicators, preserving information about well-being dimensions while supporting interpretation of relationships with well-being important to older women and health research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信