什么药物特性解释了制造商回扣的范围之广?

IF 2.7
Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf132
Molly T Beinfeld, Fariel LaMountain, Glenn Phillips, Tom Hughes, Peter J Neumann, James D Chambers
{"title":"什么药物特性解释了制造商回扣的范围之广?","authors":"Molly T Beinfeld, Fariel LaMountain, Glenn Phillips, Tom Hughes, Peter J Neumann, James D Chambers","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescription drug list prices, often cited in policy discussions, do not account for rebates negotiated between manufacturers and payers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examines factors influencing rebates in the United States, focusing on specialty drugs-ie, high priced therapies (often biologics) for which payers issue specific coverage policies. Rebate data came from SSR Health and drug attributes from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database. We stratified rebate data by drug type and characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 161 drugs found in SSR Health and SPEC as of December 2023. We found that rebates vary substantially across drugs (median of 27%, IQR 16%-53%). Biosimilar and originator drugs have the highest, most variable rebates (median of 71%, IQR 53%-79%), while rebates for cancer treatments and orphan drugs are lower (medians of 19% and 23%, respectively) and vary less (IQR of 12%-28% and 14%-29%, respectively). Drugs that face more competition from alternative options within the same therapeutic class, are self-administered, or received Food and Drug Administration approval further in the past have higher rebates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that rebates are sizeable and vary along several dimensions, many relating to market competition, complicating policy discussions around drug pricing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 7","pages":"qxaf132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What drug characteristics explain the wide range of manufacturer rebates?\",\"authors\":\"Molly T Beinfeld, Fariel LaMountain, Glenn Phillips, Tom Hughes, Peter J Neumann, James D Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxaf132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescription drug list prices, often cited in policy discussions, do not account for rebates negotiated between manufacturers and payers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examines factors influencing rebates in the United States, focusing on specialty drugs-ie, high priced therapies (often biologics) for which payers issue specific coverage policies. Rebate data came from SSR Health and drug attributes from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database. We stratified rebate data by drug type and characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 161 drugs found in SSR Health and SPEC as of December 2023. We found that rebates vary substantially across drugs (median of 27%, IQR 16%-53%). Biosimilar and originator drugs have the highest, most variable rebates (median of 71%, IQR 53%-79%), while rebates for cancer treatments and orphan drugs are lower (medians of 19% and 23%, respectively) and vary less (IQR of 12%-28% and 14%-29%, respectively). Drugs that face more competition from alternative options within the same therapeutic class, are self-administered, or received Food and Drug Administration approval further in the past have higher rebates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that rebates are sizeable and vary along several dimensions, many relating to market competition, complicating policy discussions around drug pricing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"3 7\",\"pages\":\"qxaf132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:经常在政策讨论中引用的处方药目录价格不包括制造商和支付者之间协商的回扣。方法:本研究考察了影响美国回扣的因素,重点是特殊药物,即高价疗法(通常是生物制剂),付款人为此制定了具体的保险政策。回扣数据来自塔夫茨医疗中心专业药物证据和覆盖数据库的SSR健康和药物属性。我们将返利数据按药品类型和特点进行分层。结果:截至2023年12月,我们在SSR Health和SPEC中鉴定了161种药物。我们发现不同药物的回扣差异很大(中位数为27%,IQR为16%-53%)。生物仿制药和原药的回扣最高,变化最大(中位数为71%,IQR为53%-79%),而癌症治疗和孤儿药的回扣较低(中位数分别为19%和23%),变化较小(IQR分别为12%-28%和14%-29%)。在同一治疗类别中面临更多替代方案竞争的药物,自我给药的药物,或过去获得食品和药物管理局批准的药物,其回扣更高。结论:我们的研究结果表明,回扣是相当大的,并且在几个方面有所不同,其中许多与市场竞争有关,使围绕药品定价的政策讨论复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What drug characteristics explain the wide range of manufacturer rebates?

What drug characteristics explain the wide range of manufacturer rebates?

What drug characteristics explain the wide range of manufacturer rebates?

Introduction: Prescription drug list prices, often cited in policy discussions, do not account for rebates negotiated between manufacturers and payers.

Methods: This study examines factors influencing rebates in the United States, focusing on specialty drugs-ie, high priced therapies (often biologics) for which payers issue specific coverage policies. Rebate data came from SSR Health and drug attributes from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database. We stratified rebate data by drug type and characteristics.

Results: We identified 161 drugs found in SSR Health and SPEC as of December 2023. We found that rebates vary substantially across drugs (median of 27%, IQR 16%-53%). Biosimilar and originator drugs have the highest, most variable rebates (median of 71%, IQR 53%-79%), while rebates for cancer treatments and orphan drugs are lower (medians of 19% and 23%, respectively) and vary less (IQR of 12%-28% and 14%-29%, respectively). Drugs that face more competition from alternative options within the same therapeutic class, are self-administered, or received Food and Drug Administration approval further in the past have higher rebates.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that rebates are sizeable and vary along several dimensions, many relating to market competition, complicating policy discussions around drug pricing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信