Soha Niroumandi, Heng Wei, Faisal Amlani, Hossein Gorji, Rashid Alavi, Julio A Chirinos, Niema M Pahlevan
{"title":"中心压力波形的时频机器学习传递函数。","authors":"Soha Niroumandi, Heng Wei, Faisal Amlani, Hossein Gorji, Rashid Alavi, Julio A Chirinos, Niema M Pahlevan","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Clinical studies show that pulsatile haemodynamics and pressure waveform analysis are valuable for the diagnosis and prognosis of hypertension and heart failure (HF). While generalized transfer functions (GTFs) have shown clinical significance, some studies report limitations with GTF in capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics. This study introduces a hybrid time-frequency, machine learning-based transfer function that reconstructs central pressure waveforms from peripheral measurements, accurately capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics and arterial wave-based information.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Our method uses Fourier harmonics for approximating the pressure waveform. The model is trained on these harmonics using a feed-forward neural network (FNN) with a custom time-domain cost function that captures the full temporal dynamics of physiological events during a cardiac cycle. The final hybridized-FNN transfer function model is trained, tested, and validated on data from the Framingham Heart Study (6698 participants). Our method produces carotid waveforms with median normalized mean squared error (%NMSE) values of 0.09 and 0.10 for brachial and radial inputs, compared to 0.42 and 0.26 for GTF, with similar accuracy improvements in other metrics. Correlation coefficients for the first and second forward wave times and amplitudes are 0.97, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.79 with brachial input, and 0.97, 0.92, 0.87, and 0.80 with radial input, vs. as low as 0.22 and 0.31 for GTF. Overall, our method significantly improved correlations across similarity, morphology, and wave-based parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our hybridized FNN transfer function approach enables robust calculation of the central arterial pressure waveform from a single measured peripheral waveform, preserving key physiological sequences in a cardiac cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 4","pages":"oeaf082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-frequency machine learning transfer function for central pressure waveforms.\",\"authors\":\"Soha Niroumandi, Heng Wei, Faisal Amlani, Hossein Gorji, Rashid Alavi, Julio A Chirinos, Niema M Pahlevan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Clinical studies show that pulsatile haemodynamics and pressure waveform analysis are valuable for the diagnosis and prognosis of hypertension and heart failure (HF). While generalized transfer functions (GTFs) have shown clinical significance, some studies report limitations with GTF in capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics. This study introduces a hybrid time-frequency, machine learning-based transfer function that reconstructs central pressure waveforms from peripheral measurements, accurately capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics and arterial wave-based information.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Our method uses Fourier harmonics for approximating the pressure waveform. The model is trained on these harmonics using a feed-forward neural network (FNN) with a custom time-domain cost function that captures the full temporal dynamics of physiological events during a cardiac cycle. The final hybridized-FNN transfer function model is trained, tested, and validated on data from the Framingham Heart Study (6698 participants). Our method produces carotid waveforms with median normalized mean squared error (%NMSE) values of 0.09 and 0.10 for brachial and radial inputs, compared to 0.42 and 0.26 for GTF, with similar accuracy improvements in other metrics. Correlation coefficients for the first and second forward wave times and amplitudes are 0.97, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.79 with brachial input, and 0.97, 0.92, 0.87, and 0.80 with radial input, vs. as low as 0.22 and 0.31 for GTF. Overall, our method significantly improved correlations across similarity, morphology, and wave-based parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our hybridized FNN transfer function approach enables robust calculation of the central arterial pressure waveform from a single measured peripheral waveform, preserving key physiological sequences in a cardiac cycle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal open\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"oeaf082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290398/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Time-frequency machine learning transfer function for central pressure waveforms.
Aims: Clinical studies show that pulsatile haemodynamics and pressure waveform analysis are valuable for the diagnosis and prognosis of hypertension and heart failure (HF). While generalized transfer functions (GTFs) have shown clinical significance, some studies report limitations with GTF in capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics. This study introduces a hybrid time-frequency, machine learning-based transfer function that reconstructs central pressure waveforms from peripheral measurements, accurately capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics and arterial wave-based information.
Methods and results: Our method uses Fourier harmonics for approximating the pressure waveform. The model is trained on these harmonics using a feed-forward neural network (FNN) with a custom time-domain cost function that captures the full temporal dynamics of physiological events during a cardiac cycle. The final hybridized-FNN transfer function model is trained, tested, and validated on data from the Framingham Heart Study (6698 participants). Our method produces carotid waveforms with median normalized mean squared error (%NMSE) values of 0.09 and 0.10 for brachial and radial inputs, compared to 0.42 and 0.26 for GTF, with similar accuracy improvements in other metrics. Correlation coefficients for the first and second forward wave times and amplitudes are 0.97, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.79 with brachial input, and 0.97, 0.92, 0.87, and 0.80 with radial input, vs. as low as 0.22 and 0.31 for GTF. Overall, our method significantly improved correlations across similarity, morphology, and wave-based parameters.
Conclusion: Our hybridized FNN transfer function approach enables robust calculation of the central arterial pressure waveform from a single measured peripheral waveform, preserving key physiological sequences in a cardiac cycle.