Maria I. Rodriguez , Katrina Rapp , Haley Burns , Cynthia C. Harper , Corinne H. Rocca
{"title":"社区避孕机构规模测算。","authors":"Maria I. Rodriguez , Katrina Rapp , Haley Burns , Cynthia C. Harper , Corinne H. Rocca","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the Contraceptive Agency Scale (CAS), developed as a clinic-based measure, within a community population and to assess how agency varied by demographic and reproductive characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1917 participants aged 15–45 years living in Oregon in 2023. Participants responded to the 7-item CAS, comprised items relating to active decision-making, freedom from coercion, and nonjudgmental care during their last health care visit involving contraceptive counseling. We assessed the dimensionality of the CAS and fit data to a partial credit model to analyze its psychometric performance in our community-based sample. Differences in agency by characteristics were assessed with multivariable linear regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The CAS showed adequate to good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.78). The CAS items mostly loaded onto a single factor and demonstrated reasonable fit to a partial credit model (information-weighted fit statistics ranged from 0.73 to 1.01). While participants identifying as Black had lower CAS scores than White participants (β coefficient: −1.39 [−2.19, −0.59], <em>p</em> < 0.001), Asian/Pacific Islander, Latino/a, and multiracial participants had significantly higher levels of contraceptive agency than White participants. Not desiring pregnancy was associated with higher contraceptive agency (β coefficient: 1.27 [0.72, 1.82], <em>p</em> < 0.001) In contrast, lower education, some college or less vs college or above (β coefficient: −2.14 [−2.69, −1.60], <em>p</em> < 0.001) and nonbinary/transgender identity vs female gender identity (β coefficient: −1.32 [−2.15, −0.50], <em>p</em> < 0.01) were associated with lower contraceptive agency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The CAS can be used in a community sample to evaluate patient centered contraceptive decision making as a standard of care.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Analysis of contraceptive agency among a community-based participant population offers valuable insights into experiences with contraceptive counseling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 111044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring contraceptive agency in the community\",\"authors\":\"Maria I. Rodriguez , Katrina Rapp , Haley Burns , Cynthia C. Harper , Corinne H. Rocca\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the Contraceptive Agency Scale (CAS), developed as a clinic-based measure, within a community population and to assess how agency varied by demographic and reproductive characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1917 participants aged 15–45 years living in Oregon in 2023. Participants responded to the 7-item CAS, comprised items relating to active decision-making, freedom from coercion, and nonjudgmental care during their last health care visit involving contraceptive counseling. We assessed the dimensionality of the CAS and fit data to a partial credit model to analyze its psychometric performance in our community-based sample. Differences in agency by characteristics were assessed with multivariable linear regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The CAS showed adequate to good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.78). The CAS items mostly loaded onto a single factor and demonstrated reasonable fit to a partial credit model (information-weighted fit statistics ranged from 0.73 to 1.01). While participants identifying as Black had lower CAS scores than White participants (β coefficient: −1.39 [−2.19, −0.59], <em>p</em> < 0.001), Asian/Pacific Islander, Latino/a, and multiracial participants had significantly higher levels of contraceptive agency than White participants. Not desiring pregnancy was associated with higher contraceptive agency (β coefficient: 1.27 [0.72, 1.82], <em>p</em> < 0.001) In contrast, lower education, some college or less vs college or above (β coefficient: −2.14 [−2.69, −1.60], <em>p</em> < 0.001) and nonbinary/transgender identity vs female gender identity (β coefficient: −1.32 [−2.15, −0.50], <em>p</em> < 0.01) were associated with lower contraceptive agency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The CAS can be used in a community sample to evaluate patient centered contraceptive decision making as a standard of care.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Analysis of contraceptive agency among a community-based participant population offers valuable insights into experiences with contraceptive counseling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425002355\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425002355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
This study aimed to evaluate the Contraceptive Agency Scale (CAS), developed as a clinic-based measure, within a community population and to assess how agency varied by demographic and reproductive characteristics.
Study design
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1917 participants aged 15–45 years living in Oregon in 2023. Participants responded to the 7-item CAS, comprised items relating to active decision-making, freedom from coercion, and nonjudgmental care during their last health care visit involving contraceptive counseling. We assessed the dimensionality of the CAS and fit data to a partial credit model to analyze its psychometric performance in our community-based sample. Differences in agency by characteristics were assessed with multivariable linear regression.
Results
The CAS showed adequate to good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.78). The CAS items mostly loaded onto a single factor and demonstrated reasonable fit to a partial credit model (information-weighted fit statistics ranged from 0.73 to 1.01). While participants identifying as Black had lower CAS scores than White participants (β coefficient: −1.39 [−2.19, −0.59], p < 0.001), Asian/Pacific Islander, Latino/a, and multiracial participants had significantly higher levels of contraceptive agency than White participants. Not desiring pregnancy was associated with higher contraceptive agency (β coefficient: 1.27 [0.72, 1.82], p < 0.001) In contrast, lower education, some college or less vs college or above (β coefficient: −2.14 [−2.69, −1.60], p < 0.001) and nonbinary/transgender identity vs female gender identity (β coefficient: −1.32 [−2.15, −0.50], p < 0.01) were associated with lower contraceptive agency.
Conclusions
The CAS can be used in a community sample to evaluate patient centered contraceptive decision making as a standard of care.
Implications
Analysis of contraceptive agency among a community-based participant population offers valuable insights into experiences with contraceptive counseling.
期刊介绍:
Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.