步态再训练减少胫骨加速度与标准步行方案减轻成人膝骨关节炎患者的膝关节疼痛和负荷:一项随机可行性试验。

IF 2.8 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Khara A James, Patrick Corrigan, Chun-Hao Huang, Corey Lanois, Michael P LaValley, Irene S Davis, Joshua J Stefanik
{"title":"步态再训练减少胫骨加速度与标准步行方案减轻成人膝骨关节炎患者的膝关节疼痛和负荷:一项随机可行性试验。","authors":"Khara A James, Patrick Corrigan, Chun-Hao Huang, Corey Lanois, Michael P LaValley, Irene S Davis, Joshua J Stefanik","doi":"10.1002/acr2.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial evaluating a gait retraining program to reduce peak tibial acceleration on knee pain and impact loading in adults with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 44) were randomized to a gait retraining or standard walking program. Walking duration increased from 10 to 30 minutes as feedback faded over eight sessions. Gait retraining participants received real-time biofeedback to reduce peak tibial acceleration by 20%. Feasibility criteria included rates of recruitment, enrollment, and retention and number of adverse events. Knee pain and overground impact loading were assessed at baseline and one week after the last treadmill session. Analysis of covariance models compared group differences in peak tibial acceleration, pain, and impact loading after the walking program, controlling for baseline values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most feasibility criteria were met. From 2019 to 2023, 867 individuals were screened (~22 individuals per month), and 46 were enrolled and randomized (n = 23 per group). No adverse events were identified. Peak tibial acceleration reduced by 0.13g and 0.09g (gravitational equivalents) for the gait retraining and standard walking groups, respectively. Greater reductions in pain were observed for the standard walking group compared to the gait retraining group. Changes in impact loading were not significant in either group. No between-group differences were observed for peak tibial acceleration, knee pain, or impact loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A full-scale randomized clinical trial is feasible with modification. However, gait retraining to reduce peak tibial acceleration was no more effective than a standard walking program for reducing knee pain and impact loading.</p>","PeriodicalId":93845,"journal":{"name":"ACR open rheumatology","volume":"7 8","pages":"e70079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait Retraining to Reduce Tibial Acceleration Versus a Standard Walking Program for Reducing Knee Pain and Loading in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Feasibility Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Khara A James, Patrick Corrigan, Chun-Hao Huang, Corey Lanois, Michael P LaValley, Irene S Davis, Joshua J Stefanik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr2.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial evaluating a gait retraining program to reduce peak tibial acceleration on knee pain and impact loading in adults with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 44) were randomized to a gait retraining or standard walking program. Walking duration increased from 10 to 30 minutes as feedback faded over eight sessions. Gait retraining participants received real-time biofeedback to reduce peak tibial acceleration by 20%. Feasibility criteria included rates of recruitment, enrollment, and retention and number of adverse events. Knee pain and overground impact loading were assessed at baseline and one week after the last treadmill session. Analysis of covariance models compared group differences in peak tibial acceleration, pain, and impact loading after the walking program, controlling for baseline values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most feasibility criteria were met. From 2019 to 2023, 867 individuals were screened (~22 individuals per month), and 46 were enrolled and randomized (n = 23 per group). No adverse events were identified. Peak tibial acceleration reduced by 0.13g and 0.09g (gravitational equivalents) for the gait retraining and standard walking groups, respectively. Greater reductions in pain were observed for the standard walking group compared to the gait retraining group. Changes in impact loading were not significant in either group. No between-group differences were observed for peak tibial acceleration, knee pain, or impact loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A full-scale randomized clinical trial is feasible with modification. However, gait retraining to reduce peak tibial acceleration was no more effective than a standard walking program for reducing knee pain and impact loading.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACR open rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"7 8\",\"pages\":\"e70079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACR open rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR open rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估一项随机对照试验评估步态再训练计划的可行性,以减少成人膝关节骨关节炎患者膝关节疼痛和冲击负荷的胫骨峰值加速度。方法:参与者(n = 44)随机分为步态再训练组和标准步行组。步行时间从10分钟增加到30分钟,反馈在8次后逐渐消失。步态再训练参与者接受实时生物反馈,使胫骨峰值加速度降低20%。可行性标准包括招募率、入组率和保留率以及不良事件的数量。膝关节疼痛和地面冲击负荷在基线和最后一次跑步机训练后一周进行评估。协方差模型分析比较了行走程序后胫骨峰值加速度、疼痛和冲击负荷的组间差异,控制基线值。结果:符合大部分可行性标准。从2019年到2023年,筛查了867人(每月约22人),46人入组并随机分配(每组n = 23人)。未发现不良事件。步态再训练组和标准步行组胫骨峰值加速度分别降低0.13g和0.09g(重力当量)。与步态再训练组相比,标准步行组的疼痛减轻幅度更大。两组的冲击负荷变化均不显著。在峰值胫骨加速度、膝关节疼痛或冲击负荷方面,两组间没有观察到差异。结论:一项经过修改的全规模随机临床试验是可行的。然而,步态再训练以减少峰值胫骨加速度并不比标准步行计划更有效,以减少膝关节疼痛和冲击负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gait Retraining to Reduce Tibial Acceleration Versus a Standard Walking Program for Reducing Knee Pain and Loading in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Feasibility Trial.

Gait Retraining to Reduce Tibial Acceleration Versus a Standard Walking Program for Reducing Knee Pain and Loading in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Feasibility Trial.

Gait Retraining to Reduce Tibial Acceleration Versus a Standard Walking Program for Reducing Knee Pain and Loading in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Feasibility Trial.

Gait Retraining to Reduce Tibial Acceleration Versus a Standard Walking Program for Reducing Knee Pain and Loading in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Feasibility Trial.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial evaluating a gait retraining program to reduce peak tibial acceleration on knee pain and impact loading in adults with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: Participants (n = 44) were randomized to a gait retraining or standard walking program. Walking duration increased from 10 to 30 minutes as feedback faded over eight sessions. Gait retraining participants received real-time biofeedback to reduce peak tibial acceleration by 20%. Feasibility criteria included rates of recruitment, enrollment, and retention and number of adverse events. Knee pain and overground impact loading were assessed at baseline and one week after the last treadmill session. Analysis of covariance models compared group differences in peak tibial acceleration, pain, and impact loading after the walking program, controlling for baseline values.

Results: Most feasibility criteria were met. From 2019 to 2023, 867 individuals were screened (~22 individuals per month), and 46 were enrolled and randomized (n = 23 per group). No adverse events were identified. Peak tibial acceleration reduced by 0.13g and 0.09g (gravitational equivalents) for the gait retraining and standard walking groups, respectively. Greater reductions in pain were observed for the standard walking group compared to the gait retraining group. Changes in impact loading were not significant in either group. No between-group differences were observed for peak tibial acceleration, knee pain, or impact loading.

Conclusion: A full-scale randomized clinical trial is feasible with modification. However, gait retraining to reduce peak tibial acceleration was no more effective than a standard walking program for reducing knee pain and impact loading.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信