子宫内膜异位症护理的患者经验调查:范围审查。

IF 2.9
Women's health (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1177/17455057251358042
Jenny King, Caroline Killpack
{"title":"子宫内膜异位症护理的患者经验调查:范围审查。","authors":"Jenny King, Caroline Killpack","doi":"10.1177/17455057251358042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding experiences of care for endometriosis is an important source of evidence for supporting the improvement of care quality for this long-term condition. Patient-reported experience measures are a key tool for providing this insight. However, in England, there is no national survey of experiences of endometriosis care, making it difficult to understand where care is working well and how it can be improved.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aimed to identify and describe existing surveys globally for measuring patient experience of care for people with endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>The population of interest included people with endometriosis. The concept was questionnaires in any format (e.g. article or web-based) exploring the experience of care for endometriosis in the context of any care setting.</p><p><strong>Sources of evidence: </strong>PubMed and ProQuest databases were searched between August and September 2024.</p><p><strong>Charting methods: </strong>Information extracted included study information (e.g. article title, authors, year of publication, research objectives, country), inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g. population, concept, context) and patient experience measure characteristics (e.g. name of experience measure, number of questions, domains of person-centred care, survey mode and contact approach, development process).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 209 articles screened, only seven surveys were identified for inclusion in the review. These surveys varied in context, number of items, domains of care, survey mode and contact approach. Most of the surveys focussed narrowly on one aspect of care, such as diagnosis or inpatient treatment, and three surveys included only two questions related to patient experience. Only one survey, the ENDOCARE Questionnaire, covered all eight Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With only a small number of surveys identified and only one capturing all core aspects of person-centred care, there are limited resources available for those wishing to understand and improve care quality for people with endometriosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"21 ","pages":"17455057251358042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient experience surveys for endometriosis care: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Jenny King, Caroline Killpack\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17455057251358042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding experiences of care for endometriosis is an important source of evidence for supporting the improvement of care quality for this long-term condition. Patient-reported experience measures are a key tool for providing this insight. However, in England, there is no national survey of experiences of endometriosis care, making it difficult to understand where care is working well and how it can be improved.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aimed to identify and describe existing surveys globally for measuring patient experience of care for people with endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>The population of interest included people with endometriosis. The concept was questionnaires in any format (e.g. article or web-based) exploring the experience of care for endometriosis in the context of any care setting.</p><p><strong>Sources of evidence: </strong>PubMed and ProQuest databases were searched between August and September 2024.</p><p><strong>Charting methods: </strong>Information extracted included study information (e.g. article title, authors, year of publication, research objectives, country), inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g. population, concept, context) and patient experience measure characteristics (e.g. name of experience measure, number of questions, domains of person-centred care, survey mode and contact approach, development process).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 209 articles screened, only seven surveys were identified for inclusion in the review. These surveys varied in context, number of items, domains of care, survey mode and contact approach. Most of the surveys focussed narrowly on one aspect of care, such as diagnosis or inpatient treatment, and three surveys included only two questions related to patient experience. Only one survey, the ENDOCARE Questionnaire, covered all eight Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With only a small number of surveys identified and only one capturing all core aspects of person-centred care, there are limited resources available for those wishing to understand and improve care quality for people with endometriosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"17455057251358042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251358042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251358042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解子宫内膜异位症的护理经验是支持改善这种长期疾病的护理质量的重要证据来源。患者报告的经验措施是提供这种见解的关键工具。然而,在英国,没有关于子宫内膜异位症护理经验的全国调查,这使得很难了解哪些护理工作良好以及如何改进。目的:本综述旨在确定和描述现有的全球调查,以衡量子宫内膜异位症患者的护理经历。入选标准:研究对象包括子宫内膜异位症患者。这个概念是任何形式的问卷调查(例如文章或网络),探索在任何护理环境下子宫内膜异位症的护理经验。证据来源:在2024年8月至9月期间检索PubMed和ProQuest数据库。图表方法:提取的信息包括研究信息(如文章标题、作者、出版年份、研究目标、国家)、纳入/排除标准(如人口、概念、背景)和患者体验测量特征(如体验测量名称、问题数量、以人为本的护理领域、调查模式和接触方法、开发过程)。结果:在筛选的209篇文章中,只有7篇调查被确定纳入本综述。这些调查在背景、项目数量、护理领域、调查模式和联系方式上各不相同。大多数调查只集中在护理的一个方面,如诊断或住院治疗,三个调查只包括两个与患者体验有关的问题。只有一项调查,即ENDOCARE问卷,涵盖了以人为中心的护理的所有八项Picker原则。结论:只有少数调查确定,只有一个捕获所有核心方面的以人为本的护理,有有限的资源可供那些希望了解和提高护理质量的子宫内膜异位症的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient experience surveys for endometriosis care: A scoping review.

Patient experience surveys for endometriosis care: A scoping review.

Patient experience surveys for endometriosis care: A scoping review.

Patient experience surveys for endometriosis care: A scoping review.

Background: Understanding experiences of care for endometriosis is an important source of evidence for supporting the improvement of care quality for this long-term condition. Patient-reported experience measures are a key tool for providing this insight. However, in England, there is no national survey of experiences of endometriosis care, making it difficult to understand where care is working well and how it can be improved.

Objectives: This scoping review aimed to identify and describe existing surveys globally for measuring patient experience of care for people with endometriosis.

Eligibility criteria: The population of interest included people with endometriosis. The concept was questionnaires in any format (e.g. article or web-based) exploring the experience of care for endometriosis in the context of any care setting.

Sources of evidence: PubMed and ProQuest databases were searched between August and September 2024.

Charting methods: Information extracted included study information (e.g. article title, authors, year of publication, research objectives, country), inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g. population, concept, context) and patient experience measure characteristics (e.g. name of experience measure, number of questions, domains of person-centred care, survey mode and contact approach, development process).

Results: Out of the 209 articles screened, only seven surveys were identified for inclusion in the review. These surveys varied in context, number of items, domains of care, survey mode and contact approach. Most of the surveys focussed narrowly on one aspect of care, such as diagnosis or inpatient treatment, and three surveys included only two questions related to patient experience. Only one survey, the ENDOCARE Questionnaire, covered all eight Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care.

Conclusions: With only a small number of surveys identified and only one capturing all core aspects of person-centred care, there are limited resources available for those wishing to understand and improve care quality for people with endometriosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信