{"title":"认知行为疗法对抑郁症患者体重指数的影响。","authors":"Shawn Y Sunu, Jason R Woloski","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.921088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mood can affect an individual's weight and eating habits, making cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) a potential approach to improving body mass index (BMI). Nevertheless, analyzing weight change is complex due to other factors, such as exercise and medications. This retrospective study examines BMI changes in depressed patients undergoing CBT exclusively for depression, not weight management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study compared BMI changes between a CBT group and a no CBT group of depressed patients at an academic medical center in central Pennsylvania. To minimize variability, participants were matched one-to-one for gender, age at diagnosis, and BMI at diagnosis. Both groups were followed from the initial psychology visit to the completion of CBT in the experimental group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2009 to 2019, 1,659 people were diagnosed with depression, but only 231 underwent CBT for depression. The CBT group had a slightly higher BMI at baseline (BMI=35.7 vs BMI=34.6). Among controls (no CBT), 9.2% were on Medicaid compared to only 1.3% in the experimental group. Overall, neither group showed a median difference in BMI during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBT alone did not significantly impact BMI when used exclusively for depression without additional weight-loss interventions. A secondary finding was the apparent underutilization of CBT among those with depression. Future research should explore barriers to CBT access in the depressed population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Body Mass Index in Patients Treated Exclusively for Depression.\",\"authors\":\"Shawn Y Sunu, Jason R Woloski\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.921088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mood can affect an individual's weight and eating habits, making cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) a potential approach to improving body mass index (BMI). Nevertheless, analyzing weight change is complex due to other factors, such as exercise and medications. This retrospective study examines BMI changes in depressed patients undergoing CBT exclusively for depression, not weight management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study compared BMI changes between a CBT group and a no CBT group of depressed patients at an academic medical center in central Pennsylvania. To minimize variability, participants were matched one-to-one for gender, age at diagnosis, and BMI at diagnosis. Both groups were followed from the initial psychology visit to the completion of CBT in the experimental group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2009 to 2019, 1,659 people were diagnosed with depression, but only 231 underwent CBT for depression. The CBT group had a slightly higher BMI at baseline (BMI=35.7 vs BMI=34.6). Among controls (no CBT), 9.2% were on Medicaid compared to only 1.3% in the experimental group. Overall, neither group showed a median difference in BMI during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBT alone did not significantly impact BMI when used exclusively for depression without additional weight-loss interventions. A secondary finding was the apparent underutilization of CBT among those with depression. Future research should explore barriers to CBT access in the depressed population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.921088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.921088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:情绪会影响一个人的体重和饮食习惯,这使得认知行为疗法(CBT)成为改善身体质量指数(BMI)的潜在方法。然而,由于运动和药物等其他因素,分析体重变化是复杂的。这项回顾性研究调查了接受CBT治疗的抑郁症患者的BMI变化,而不是体重管理。方法:在宾夕法尼亚州中部的一个学术医疗中心,回顾性研究比较了CBT组和非CBT组抑郁症患者的BMI变化。为了尽量减少可变性,参与者在性别、诊断时的年龄和诊断时的BMI进行了一对一的匹配。两组从最初的心理访问一直到实验组完成CBT治疗。结果:从2009年到2019年,1659人被诊断患有抑郁症,但只有231人接受了抑郁症的CBT治疗。CBT组的基线BMI略高(BMI=35.7 vs BMI=34.6)。在对照组(没有CBT)中,9.2%的人接受医疗补助,而实验组只有1.3%。总的来说,在研究期间,两组都没有表现出BMI的中位数差异。结论:单独使用CBT治疗抑郁症时,没有额外的减肥干预,对BMI没有显著影响。第二个发现是抑郁症患者明显没有充分利用CBT。未来的研究应该探索抑郁症患者接受认知行为治疗的障碍。
The Impact of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Body Mass Index in Patients Treated Exclusively for Depression.
Introduction: Mood can affect an individual's weight and eating habits, making cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) a potential approach to improving body mass index (BMI). Nevertheless, analyzing weight change is complex due to other factors, such as exercise and medications. This retrospective study examines BMI changes in depressed patients undergoing CBT exclusively for depression, not weight management.
Methods: A retrospective study compared BMI changes between a CBT group and a no CBT group of depressed patients at an academic medical center in central Pennsylvania. To minimize variability, participants were matched one-to-one for gender, age at diagnosis, and BMI at diagnosis. Both groups were followed from the initial psychology visit to the completion of CBT in the experimental group.
Results: From 2009 to 2019, 1,659 people were diagnosed with depression, but only 231 underwent CBT for depression. The CBT group had a slightly higher BMI at baseline (BMI=35.7 vs BMI=34.6). Among controls (no CBT), 9.2% were on Medicaid compared to only 1.3% in the experimental group. Overall, neither group showed a median difference in BMI during the study period.
Conclusions: CBT alone did not significantly impact BMI when used exclusively for depression without additional weight-loss interventions. A secondary finding was the apparent underutilization of CBT among those with depression. Future research should explore barriers to CBT access in the depressed population.