促进多样性和健康公平:招聘和教育中的最佳做法。

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2025.166556
Jean Wong, Mercy Adetoye, Ebony Parker-Featherstone, Laura Lee, Jenna B Greenberg, John Holkeboer, Thomas Bishop
{"title":"促进多样性和健康公平:招聘和教育中的最佳做法。","authors":"Jean Wong, Mercy Adetoye, Ebony Parker-Featherstone, Laura Lee, Jenna B Greenberg, John Holkeboer, Thomas Bishop","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.166556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education common requirements mandate that programs recruit and retain a diverse and inclusive workforce of residents. To achieve this aim and align with corresponding institutional equity goals, we developed a multifaceted intervention to recruit and train residents underrepresented in medicine (URiM) at a large academic residency program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a holistic review of residency applications, including de-emphasizing board scores and recommendation letters, blinding academic information, and integrating behavioral-based interview questions. A departmental diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) committee member was added to the recruitment committee, all members of which underwent bias training. Updated curricula included DEI training across family medicine disciplines, integration of an advocacy and health equity curriculum, and quality improvement through a health equity lens, among other initiatives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 4 years preintervention, self-identified URiM residents comprised only 6.25% of our program (3/48). Over 4 years postintervention, this percentage increased to 21.15% (11/52, <i>P</i>=.043). We also saw compliance above national specialty mean in ACGME resident surveys in nearly every DEI measurement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Holistic changes to our recruitment and training efforts and structure had a direct impact on increasing the number of URiM applicants matching to our program. Curricular and institutional changes highlighting our commitment to DEI+ efforts improved our ability to match a diverse group of applicants. Limitations included self-reporting of Electronic Residency Application Service ethnic minority data and determining which of the several simultaneous interventions was most influential.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting Diversity and Health Equity: Recruitment and Best Practices in Education.\",\"authors\":\"Jean Wong, Mercy Adetoye, Ebony Parker-Featherstone, Laura Lee, Jenna B Greenberg, John Holkeboer, Thomas Bishop\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.166556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education common requirements mandate that programs recruit and retain a diverse and inclusive workforce of residents. To achieve this aim and align with corresponding institutional equity goals, we developed a multifaceted intervention to recruit and train residents underrepresented in medicine (URiM) at a large academic residency program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a holistic review of residency applications, including de-emphasizing board scores and recommendation letters, blinding academic information, and integrating behavioral-based interview questions. A departmental diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) committee member was added to the recruitment committee, all members of which underwent bias training. Updated curricula included DEI training across family medicine disciplines, integration of an advocacy and health equity curriculum, and quality improvement through a health equity lens, among other initiatives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 4 years preintervention, self-identified URiM residents comprised only 6.25% of our program (3/48). Over 4 years postintervention, this percentage increased to 21.15% (11/52, <i>P</i>=.043). We also saw compliance above national specialty mean in ACGME resident surveys in nearly every DEI measurement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Holistic changes to our recruitment and training efforts and structure had a direct impact on increasing the number of URiM applicants matching to our program. Curricular and institutional changes highlighting our commitment to DEI+ efforts improved our ability to match a diverse group of applicants. Limitations included self-reporting of Electronic Residency Application Service ethnic minority data and determining which of the several simultaneous interventions was most influential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.166556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.166556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:研究生医学教育认证委员会共同要求项目招聘和保留多样化和包容性的住院医生队伍。为了实现这一目标并与相应的机构公平目标保持一致,我们制定了一项多方面的干预措施,在一个大型学术住院医师计划中招募和培训医学代表性不足的住院医师(URiM)。方法:我们对住院医师申请进行了全面的审查,包括不强调董事会分数和推荐信,盲化学术信息,并整合基于行为的面试问题。招聘委员会增加了一名部门多元化、公平和包容(DEI)委员会成员,所有成员都接受了偏见培训。更新后的课程包括跨家庭医学学科的DEI培训,整合宣传和保健公平课程,以及通过保健公平角度提高质量等举措。结果:在4年的预防干预中,自我认定的URiM居民仅占我们项目的6.25%(3/48)。干预后4年,这一比例上升至21.15% (11/52,P= 0.043)。我们还看到,在几乎所有的DEI测量中,ACGME居民调查的依从性都高于国家专业平均水平。结论:我们的招聘和培训工作以及结构的整体变化对增加与我们项目相匹配的URiM申请人数量产生了直接影响。课程和制度的变化突出了我们对DEI+努力的承诺,提高了我们匹配不同申请者群体的能力。限制包括电子居留申请服务少数民族数据的自我报告,以及确定几种同时干预措施中哪一种影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting Diversity and Health Equity: Recruitment and Best Practices in Education.

Introduction: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education common requirements mandate that programs recruit and retain a diverse and inclusive workforce of residents. To achieve this aim and align with corresponding institutional equity goals, we developed a multifaceted intervention to recruit and train residents underrepresented in medicine (URiM) at a large academic residency program.

Methods: We implemented a holistic review of residency applications, including de-emphasizing board scores and recommendation letters, blinding academic information, and integrating behavioral-based interview questions. A departmental diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) committee member was added to the recruitment committee, all members of which underwent bias training. Updated curricula included DEI training across family medicine disciplines, integration of an advocacy and health equity curriculum, and quality improvement through a health equity lens, among other initiatives.

Results: Over 4 years preintervention, self-identified URiM residents comprised only 6.25% of our program (3/48). Over 4 years postintervention, this percentage increased to 21.15% (11/52, P=.043). We also saw compliance above national specialty mean in ACGME resident surveys in nearly every DEI measurement.

Conclusions: Holistic changes to our recruitment and training efforts and structure had a direct impact on increasing the number of URiM applicants matching to our program. Curricular and institutional changes highlighting our commitment to DEI+ efforts improved our ability to match a diverse group of applicants. Limitations included self-reporting of Electronic Residency Application Service ethnic minority data and determining which of the several simultaneous interventions was most influential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信