设计一个最好的照顾者的历史,以促进处置计划的老年人在急诊科。

Journal of geriatric emergency medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.17294/2694-4715.1086
Karen de Sola-Smith, Matthew Growdon, Anita N Chary, Jennifer D Portz, Kenneth Lam
{"title":"设计一个最好的照顾者的历史,以促进处置计划的老年人在急诊科。","authors":"Karen de Sola-Smith, Matthew Growdon, Anita N Chary, Jennifer D Portz, Kenneth Lam","doi":"10.17294/2694-4715.1086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Detailed information about caregivers is crucial for planning disposition from emergency departments (EDs), but it is unclear what specific information is useful for ED clinicians and how that information should be presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a Design Thinking approach to develop a standardized format-which we call a \"Best Possible Caregiver History\" (BPCH)-for displaying useful caregiver information to ED clinicians. The key steps of this approach are needfinding, followed by iterative cycles of ideation, rapid prototyping, and testing. For needfinding, we used semi-structured interviews of four ED clinicians on current practices for discovering and documenting caregiver information. For ideation and prototyping, we used rapid qualitative analysis to identify themes and used them as design constraints informing low-fidelity prototyping of the BPCH. For testing, we sought user feedback in interprofessional focus groups of ED social workers, nurses, therapists, and physicians. Focus group feedback was then analyzed to inform the design of subsequent prototypes, which were iteratively presented to subsequent focus groups five times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial needfinding interviews found that caregiver information is gathered but often dispersed throughout the medical record, collected redundantly, and difficult to find and interpret. A structured and accessible shared note such as a BPCH would be useful. In focus groups, several design constraints for the BPCH emerged: caregiving data must include details about transportation, power of attorney, and home environment to be relevant for disposition, comprehensive, paired with functional assessments, and systematically presented. The BPCH does not require detail about persons or services helping with instrumental activities like shopping or banking. After five iterations, ED clinicians described the BPCH as useful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We illustrate how Design Thinking can help rapidly develop a novel format for displaying details about caregivers that could facilitate safer disposition from the ED. The BPCH embodies what ED clinicians at our institution consider clinically relevant for their practice. Further research is needed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and generalizability of this intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":73757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a Best Possible Caregiver History to Facilitate Disposition Planning for Older Adults in Emergency Departments.\",\"authors\":\"Karen de Sola-Smith, Matthew Growdon, Anita N Chary, Jennifer D Portz, Kenneth Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.17294/2694-4715.1086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Detailed information about caregivers is crucial for planning disposition from emergency departments (EDs), but it is unclear what specific information is useful for ED clinicians and how that information should be presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a Design Thinking approach to develop a standardized format-which we call a \\\"Best Possible Caregiver History\\\" (BPCH)-for displaying useful caregiver information to ED clinicians. The key steps of this approach are needfinding, followed by iterative cycles of ideation, rapid prototyping, and testing. For needfinding, we used semi-structured interviews of four ED clinicians on current practices for discovering and documenting caregiver information. For ideation and prototyping, we used rapid qualitative analysis to identify themes and used them as design constraints informing low-fidelity prototyping of the BPCH. For testing, we sought user feedback in interprofessional focus groups of ED social workers, nurses, therapists, and physicians. Focus group feedback was then analyzed to inform the design of subsequent prototypes, which were iteratively presented to subsequent focus groups five times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial needfinding interviews found that caregiver information is gathered but often dispersed throughout the medical record, collected redundantly, and difficult to find and interpret. A structured and accessible shared note such as a BPCH would be useful. In focus groups, several design constraints for the BPCH emerged: caregiving data must include details about transportation, power of attorney, and home environment to be relevant for disposition, comprehensive, paired with functional assessments, and systematically presented. The BPCH does not require detail about persons or services helping with instrumental activities like shopping or banking. After five iterations, ED clinicians described the BPCH as useful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We illustrate how Design Thinking can help rapidly develop a novel format for displaying details about caregivers that could facilitate safer disposition from the ED. The BPCH embodies what ED clinicians at our institution consider clinically relevant for their practice. Further research is needed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and generalizability of this intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303133/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17294/2694-4715.1086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2694-4715.1086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于护理人员的详细信息对于从急诊科(ED)规划处置是至关重要的,但目前尚不清楚哪些具体信息对急诊科临床医生有用,以及这些信息应该如何呈现。方法:我们使用设计思维方法开发了一种标准化的格式,我们称之为“最佳护理历史”(BPCH),用于向急诊科临床医生显示有用的护理人员信息。这种方法的关键步骤是需求发现,然后是构思、快速原型和测试的迭代循环。对于需求发现,我们使用了四名急诊科临床医生的半结构化访谈,以发现和记录护理人员的信息。对于构思和原型,我们使用快速定性分析来确定主题,并将其作为设计约束,告知BPCH的低保真原型。为了进行测试,我们在由急诊科社工、护士、治疗师和医生组成的跨专业焦点小组中寻求用户反馈。然后对焦点小组的反馈进行分析,为后续原型的设计提供信息,并将原型迭代地呈现给后续焦点小组5次。结果:最初的需求寻找访谈发现,护理人员的信息是收集的,但往往分散在整个医疗记录中,收集冗余,很难找到和解释。结构化和可访问的共享笔记(如BPCH)将是有用的。在焦点小组中,出现了BPCH的几个设计限制:护理数据必须包括与处置相关的交通、授权书和家庭环境的详细信息,全面,与功能评估相结合,并系统地呈现。BPCH不需要详细说明帮助购物或银行等工具性活动的人员或服务。经过五次迭代,ED临床医生认为BPCH是有用的。结论:我们说明了设计思维如何帮助快速开发一种新的格式来显示护理人员的详细信息,从而促进急诊科更安全的处置。BPCH体现了我们机构的急诊科临床医生认为与他们的实践临床相关的内容。需要进一步的研究来确定这种干预的可行性、可接受性和普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing a Best Possible Caregiver History to Facilitate Disposition Planning for Older Adults in Emergency Departments.

Introduction: Detailed information about caregivers is crucial for planning disposition from emergency departments (EDs), but it is unclear what specific information is useful for ED clinicians and how that information should be presented.

Methods: We used a Design Thinking approach to develop a standardized format-which we call a "Best Possible Caregiver History" (BPCH)-for displaying useful caregiver information to ED clinicians. The key steps of this approach are needfinding, followed by iterative cycles of ideation, rapid prototyping, and testing. For needfinding, we used semi-structured interviews of four ED clinicians on current practices for discovering and documenting caregiver information. For ideation and prototyping, we used rapid qualitative analysis to identify themes and used them as design constraints informing low-fidelity prototyping of the BPCH. For testing, we sought user feedback in interprofessional focus groups of ED social workers, nurses, therapists, and physicians. Focus group feedback was then analyzed to inform the design of subsequent prototypes, which were iteratively presented to subsequent focus groups five times.

Results: Initial needfinding interviews found that caregiver information is gathered but often dispersed throughout the medical record, collected redundantly, and difficult to find and interpret. A structured and accessible shared note such as a BPCH would be useful. In focus groups, several design constraints for the BPCH emerged: caregiving data must include details about transportation, power of attorney, and home environment to be relevant for disposition, comprehensive, paired with functional assessments, and systematically presented. The BPCH does not require detail about persons or services helping with instrumental activities like shopping or banking. After five iterations, ED clinicians described the BPCH as useful.

Conclusion: We illustrate how Design Thinking can help rapidly develop a novel format for displaying details about caregivers that could facilitate safer disposition from the ED. The BPCH embodies what ED clinicians at our institution consider clinically relevant for their practice. Further research is needed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and generalizability of this intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信