澳大利亚外包政策相关职能:健康与公平影响。

IF 2.6 0 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julia Anaf, Toby Freeman, Fran Baum
{"title":"澳大利亚外包政策相关职能:健康与公平影响。","authors":"Julia Anaf, Toby Freeman, Fran Baum","doi":"10.1177/27551938251355452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Changes to the public sector in Australia over recent decades result from the adoption of neoliberal policies and New Public Management techniques. By the 1990s Australian governments were privatizing a significant portion of public sector roles, including outsourcing a range of traditional government services, policy, and decision making to the private sector, often to large global consultancy firms. While much is known about privatization and outsourcing, less is known about the health and equity impacts. Using a qualitative approach, data collection included documents, website searches, Parliament of Australia Hansard transcripts, media items, and semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 11). Six key themes were identified, including the scope of outsourcing, consultants' strategies, conflicts of interest, undermining the public sector, poor outcomes for the public, and implications for equity. The use of private sector actors in the Australian public sector has led to promoting private over public interests. There are legitimate reasons for governments to engage the services of global consulting firms in instances when public sector capacity cannot deliver specific highly specialized work. However, the current extensive use of consultants should be decreased through rebuilding public sector capacity to promote health and equity, and public over private interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":73479,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","volume":" ","pages":"428-440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outsourcing Policy-Related Functions in Australia: Health and Equity Impacts.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Anaf, Toby Freeman, Fran Baum\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27551938251355452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Changes to the public sector in Australia over recent decades result from the adoption of neoliberal policies and New Public Management techniques. By the 1990s Australian governments were privatizing a significant portion of public sector roles, including outsourcing a range of traditional government services, policy, and decision making to the private sector, often to large global consultancy firms. While much is known about privatization and outsourcing, less is known about the health and equity impacts. Using a qualitative approach, data collection included documents, website searches, Parliament of Australia Hansard transcripts, media items, and semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 11). Six key themes were identified, including the scope of outsourcing, consultants' strategies, conflicts of interest, undermining the public sector, poor outcomes for the public, and implications for equity. The use of private sector actors in the Australian public sector has led to promoting private over public interests. There are legitimate reasons for governments to engage the services of global consulting firms in instances when public sector capacity cannot deliver specific highly specialized work. However, the current extensive use of consultants should be decreased through rebuilding public sector capacity to promote health and equity, and public over private interests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of social determinants of health and health services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"428-440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of social determinants of health and health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938251355452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938251355452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,澳大利亚公共部门的变化是采用新自由主义政策和新公共管理技术的结果。到20世纪90年代,澳大利亚政府正在将公共部门的很大一部分角色私有化,包括将一系列传统的政府服务、政策和决策外包给私营部门,通常是外包给大型全球咨询公司。虽然对私有化和外包了解很多,但对健康和公平的影响了解较少。采用定性方法,数据收集包括文件、网站搜索、澳大利亚议会议事记录、媒体项目和半结构化访谈(n = 11)。确定了六个关键主题,包括外包的范围、顾问的策略、利益冲突、破坏公共部门、公众的不良结果以及对公平的影响。在澳大利亚公共部门中使用私营部门行为者导致了将私人利益置于公共利益之上。在公共部门能力无法提供具体的高度专业化工作的情况下,政府有正当理由聘请全球咨询公司提供服务。但是,应通过重建公共部门促进健康和公平以及公共利益高于私人利益的能力,减少目前广泛使用顾问的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outsourcing Policy-Related Functions in Australia: Health and Equity Impacts.

Outsourcing Policy-Related Functions in Australia: Health and Equity Impacts.

Changes to the public sector in Australia over recent decades result from the adoption of neoliberal policies and New Public Management techniques. By the 1990s Australian governments were privatizing a significant portion of public sector roles, including outsourcing a range of traditional government services, policy, and decision making to the private sector, often to large global consultancy firms. While much is known about privatization and outsourcing, less is known about the health and equity impacts. Using a qualitative approach, data collection included documents, website searches, Parliament of Australia Hansard transcripts, media items, and semi-structured interviews (n = 11). Six key themes were identified, including the scope of outsourcing, consultants' strategies, conflicts of interest, undermining the public sector, poor outcomes for the public, and implications for equity. The use of private sector actors in the Australian public sector has led to promoting private over public interests. There are legitimate reasons for governments to engage the services of global consulting firms in instances when public sector capacity cannot deliver specific highly specialized work. However, the current extensive use of consultants should be decreased through rebuilding public sector capacity to promote health and equity, and public over private interests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信