种植体周围炎重建方法的处理:使用开放膜技术引导骨再生:一个案例研究。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hsin-Chiang Lee
{"title":"种植体周围炎重建方法的处理:使用开放膜技术引导骨再生:一个案例研究。","authors":"Hsin-Chiang Lee","doi":"10.1002/cap.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The restoration of the healthy peri-implant tissue and re-osseointegration represent the goals of reconstructive procedures for treating peri-implantitis. Peri-implant regeneration is a field that requires further optimization to increase predictability. The submerged approach has been shown to yield superior defect fill compared to the non-submerged approach. Nevertheless, primary closure in the submerged approach can result in diminished keratinized tissue. This case study presents an alternative approach to managing advanced peri-implantitis, with the use of open membrane technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 71-year-old female presented with #30 peri-implantitis, exhibiting 10 mm probing depth, suppuration upon probing, and severe bone loss. The implant prosthesis was removed prior to the surgery to gain access to instrumentation. Subsequent to the debridement of the defect and implant detoxification, a mix of xenograft and enamel matrix derivatives was used to fill the defect. High-density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane was placed over the defect. The flaps were replaced without attempting primary closure, and the membrane was intentionally left exposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disease resolution with significant radiographic bone fill was achieved and remained stable with 20 months follow-up. In addition, keratinized tissue was adequately preserved after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reconstructive surgery using the open membrane approach can be an alternative for managing advanced peri-implantitis defects, with the advantages of preserving keratinized tissue and reducing intrasurgical trauma.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The open membrane technique may serve as a viable alternative to primary closure in guided bone regeneration for peri-implant reconstructive procedures. Advantages include reduced surgical trauma, shorter procedure time, and preservation of keratinized tissue. Careful case selection is essential for achieving predictable outcomes. Factors to consider include defect configuration, the number of remaining bony walls, and the size of the wound opening. In more challenging cases, combination therapy and the adjunctive use of biologics may be considered to enhance regenerative potential and improve clinical results.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This case study presents the regenerative treatment of chronic inflammation and bone loss around a dental implant using the open membrane technique. To manage the condition, the crown portion of the dental implant was removed, and the implant surface was thoroughly cleaned and disinfected. The space around the implant was then filled with bone graft and biological agents and covered with a membrane. Unlike typical regenerative procedures, the membrane was intentionally left partially exposed rather than being fully covered by the gum during healing. After the procedure, the infection was resolved, and the area remained healthy for up to 20 months. This case suggests that the open membrane technique may be a successful option for treating severe implant infections, especially when the goal is to preserve protective gum tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of peri-implantitis with a reconstructive approach: Guided bone regeneration using the open membrane technique: A case study.\",\"authors\":\"Hsin-Chiang Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cap.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The restoration of the healthy peri-implant tissue and re-osseointegration represent the goals of reconstructive procedures for treating peri-implantitis. Peri-implant regeneration is a field that requires further optimization to increase predictability. The submerged approach has been shown to yield superior defect fill compared to the non-submerged approach. Nevertheless, primary closure in the submerged approach can result in diminished keratinized tissue. This case study presents an alternative approach to managing advanced peri-implantitis, with the use of open membrane technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 71-year-old female presented with #30 peri-implantitis, exhibiting 10 mm probing depth, suppuration upon probing, and severe bone loss. The implant prosthesis was removed prior to the surgery to gain access to instrumentation. Subsequent to the debridement of the defect and implant detoxification, a mix of xenograft and enamel matrix derivatives was used to fill the defect. High-density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane was placed over the defect. The flaps were replaced without attempting primary closure, and the membrane was intentionally left exposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Disease resolution with significant radiographic bone fill was achieved and remained stable with 20 months follow-up. In addition, keratinized tissue was adequately preserved after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reconstructive surgery using the open membrane approach can be an alternative for managing advanced peri-implantitis defects, with the advantages of preserving keratinized tissue and reducing intrasurgical trauma.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The open membrane technique may serve as a viable alternative to primary closure in guided bone regeneration for peri-implant reconstructive procedures. Advantages include reduced surgical trauma, shorter procedure time, and preservation of keratinized tissue. Careful case selection is essential for achieving predictable outcomes. Factors to consider include defect configuration, the number of remaining bony walls, and the size of the wound opening. In more challenging cases, combination therapy and the adjunctive use of biologics may be considered to enhance regenerative potential and improve clinical results.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This case study presents the regenerative treatment of chronic inflammation and bone loss around a dental implant using the open membrane technique. To manage the condition, the crown portion of the dental implant was removed, and the implant surface was thoroughly cleaned and disinfected. The space around the implant was then filled with bone graft and biological agents and covered with a membrane. Unlike typical regenerative procedures, the membrane was intentionally left partially exposed rather than being fully covered by the gum during healing. After the procedure, the infection was resolved, and the area remained healthy for up to 20 months. This case suggests that the open membrane technique may be a successful option for treating severe implant infections, especially when the goal is to preserve protective gum tissue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Advances in Periodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Advances in Periodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.70001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康种植体周围组织的恢复和再骨整合是治疗种植体周围炎重建手术的目标。种植体周围再生是一个需要进一步优化以增加可预测性的领域。与非浸没入路相比,浸没入路已被证明能产生更好的缺陷填充。然而,浸没入路的初步闭合可导致角化组织减少。本病例研究提出了一种治疗晚期种植体周围炎的替代方法,即使用开膜技术。方法:一名71岁女性患者表现为#30种植体周围炎,表现为探探深度10mm,探探时化脓,严重骨质流失。植体假体在手术前被移除以获得内固定。随后对缺损进行清创和种植体解毒,使用异种移植物和牙釉质基质衍生物的混合物来填补缺损。高密度聚四氟乙烯膜覆盖缺损。皮瓣被替换,没有尝试初级闭合,膜被故意暴露。结果:在20个月的随访中,疾病得到了明显的x线骨填充,并保持稳定。此外,术后角质化组织得到充分保存。结论:开放膜入路重建手术是治疗晚期种植体周围炎缺损的一种选择,具有保留角化组织和减少术中创伤的优点。重点:开放膜技术可以作为一种可行的替代方法,用于种植体周围重建手术的引导骨再生。优点包括减少手术创伤,缩短手术时间,保存角化组织。谨慎的病例选择对于实现可预测的结果至关重要。考虑的因素包括缺损的形态、剩余骨壁的数量和创口的大小。在更具挑战性的病例中,联合治疗和辅助使用生物制剂可以考虑增强再生潜力和改善临床结果。简单的语言总结:本案例研究介绍了使用开膜技术对种植体周围慢性炎症和骨质流失的再生治疗。为了控制这种情况,将种植体的冠部分移除,并彻底清洁和消毒种植体表面。然后用骨移植物和生物制剂填充种植体周围的空间,并用膜覆盖。与典型的再生手术不同,在愈合过程中,膜被故意部分暴露,而不是完全被牙龈覆盖。手术后,感染得到了解决,该区域保持健康长达20个月。这个病例表明,开放膜技术可能是治疗严重种植体感染的成功选择,特别是当目标是保护牙龈组织时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of peri-implantitis with a reconstructive approach: Guided bone regeneration using the open membrane technique: A case study.

Background: The restoration of the healthy peri-implant tissue and re-osseointegration represent the goals of reconstructive procedures for treating peri-implantitis. Peri-implant regeneration is a field that requires further optimization to increase predictability. The submerged approach has been shown to yield superior defect fill compared to the non-submerged approach. Nevertheless, primary closure in the submerged approach can result in diminished keratinized tissue. This case study presents an alternative approach to managing advanced peri-implantitis, with the use of open membrane technique.

Methods: A 71-year-old female presented with #30 peri-implantitis, exhibiting 10 mm probing depth, suppuration upon probing, and severe bone loss. The implant prosthesis was removed prior to the surgery to gain access to instrumentation. Subsequent to the debridement of the defect and implant detoxification, a mix of xenograft and enamel matrix derivatives was used to fill the defect. High-density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane was placed over the defect. The flaps were replaced without attempting primary closure, and the membrane was intentionally left exposed.

Results: Disease resolution with significant radiographic bone fill was achieved and remained stable with 20 months follow-up. In addition, keratinized tissue was adequately preserved after surgery.

Conclusion: Reconstructive surgery using the open membrane approach can be an alternative for managing advanced peri-implantitis defects, with the advantages of preserving keratinized tissue and reducing intrasurgical trauma.

Key points: The open membrane technique may serve as a viable alternative to primary closure in guided bone regeneration for peri-implant reconstructive procedures. Advantages include reduced surgical trauma, shorter procedure time, and preservation of keratinized tissue. Careful case selection is essential for achieving predictable outcomes. Factors to consider include defect configuration, the number of remaining bony walls, and the size of the wound opening. In more challenging cases, combination therapy and the adjunctive use of biologics may be considered to enhance regenerative potential and improve clinical results.

Plain language summary: This case study presents the regenerative treatment of chronic inflammation and bone loss around a dental implant using the open membrane technique. To manage the condition, the crown portion of the dental implant was removed, and the implant surface was thoroughly cleaned and disinfected. The space around the implant was then filled with bone graft and biological agents and covered with a membrane. Unlike typical regenerative procedures, the membrane was intentionally left partially exposed rather than being fully covered by the gum during healing. After the procedure, the infection was resolved, and the area remained healthy for up to 20 months. This case suggests that the open membrane technique may be a successful option for treating severe implant infections, especially when the goal is to preserve protective gum tissue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信