电子健康记录大数据准备好在研究中二次使用了吗?探讨阿片类药物的潜在局限性作为案例研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1177/14604582251363501
Hanna M Tolonen, Jouni Kaukovuori, Marja Airaksinen, Anna-Riia Holmström
{"title":"电子健康记录大数据准备好在研究中二次使用了吗?探讨阿片类药物的潜在局限性作为案例研究。","authors":"Hanna M Tolonen, Jouni Kaukovuori, Marja Airaksinen, Anna-Riia Holmström","doi":"10.1177/14604582251363501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare big data has raised expectations for secondary use in research and information-based management. This case study explores limitations of using electronic health record (EHR) data from a hospital data lake by deriving indicators on opioid prescribing. A multi-staged method to calculate indicators of rational opioid use was developed covering both inpatient orders and outpatient prescriptions. The process included data selection, editing, organization, and validation. Visual Basic was employed to calculate indicators and to semi-quantify data limitations. Data (2015-2019) covered 3.3 million patients with 179,853 opioid and 22,415 benzodiazepine orders. Data quality issues, including unstructured, irregular, and invalid entries, limited analysis to indicators on opioid use and contraindications. In conclusion, secondary use should be considered in EHR system development. Data should be recorded in structured and unambiguous format, and methods for data quality measurement should be developed to ensure high-quality data is readily available in data lakes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 3","pages":"14604582251363501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are electronic health record big data ready for secondary use in research? Exploring potential limitations with opioids as a case study.\",\"authors\":\"Hanna M Tolonen, Jouni Kaukovuori, Marja Airaksinen, Anna-Riia Holmström\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582251363501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare big data has raised expectations for secondary use in research and information-based management. This case study explores limitations of using electronic health record (EHR) data from a hospital data lake by deriving indicators on opioid prescribing. A multi-staged method to calculate indicators of rational opioid use was developed covering both inpatient orders and outpatient prescriptions. The process included data selection, editing, organization, and validation. Visual Basic was employed to calculate indicators and to semi-quantify data limitations. Data (2015-2019) covered 3.3 million patients with 179,853 opioid and 22,415 benzodiazepine orders. Data quality issues, including unstructured, irregular, and invalid entries, limited analysis to indicators on opioid use and contraindications. In conclusion, secondary use should be considered in EHR system development. Data should be recorded in structured and unambiguous format, and methods for data quality measurement should be developed to ensure high-quality data is readily available in data lakes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"14604582251363501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251363501\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251363501","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗大数据在研究和信息化管理方面的二次利用提高了人们的期望。本案例研究通过得出阿片类药物处方指标,探讨了使用来自医院数据湖的电子健康记录(EHR)数据的局限性。开发了一种多阶段的方法来计算阿片类药物合理使用的指标,涵盖住院订单和门诊处方。该过程包括数据选择、编辑、组织和验证。使用Visual Basic计算指标并对数据限制进行半量化。数据(2015-2019)涵盖330万患者,共订购179,853个阿片类药物和22,415个苯二氮卓类药物。数据质量问题,包括非结构化、不规则和无效条目,对阿片类药物使用和禁忌症指标的分析有限。综上所述,电子病历系统开发应考虑二次利用。数据应以结构化和明确的格式记录,并应制定数据质量测量方法,以确保数据湖中随时可获得高质量数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are electronic health record big data ready for secondary use in research? Exploring potential limitations with opioids as a case study.

Healthcare big data has raised expectations for secondary use in research and information-based management. This case study explores limitations of using electronic health record (EHR) data from a hospital data lake by deriving indicators on opioid prescribing. A multi-staged method to calculate indicators of rational opioid use was developed covering both inpatient orders and outpatient prescriptions. The process included data selection, editing, organization, and validation. Visual Basic was employed to calculate indicators and to semi-quantify data limitations. Data (2015-2019) covered 3.3 million patients with 179,853 opioid and 22,415 benzodiazepine orders. Data quality issues, including unstructured, irregular, and invalid entries, limited analysis to indicators on opioid use and contraindications. In conclusion, secondary use should be considered in EHR system development. Data should be recorded in structured and unambiguous format, and methods for data quality measurement should be developed to ensure high-quality data is readily available in data lakes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信