致病?患者满意度评分对临床决策的影响。

IF 0.9 Q4 NURSING
NURSE PRACTITIONER Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-29 DOI:10.1097/01.NPR.0000000000000345
Stacie L Rothfus, Jennifer L Mabry
{"title":"致病?患者满意度评分对临床决策的影响。","authors":"Stacie L Rothfus, Jennifer L Mabry","doi":"10.1097/01.NPR.0000000000000345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient satisfaction scores (PSSs) were first introduced to enhance patient experiences and health outcomes and offer a standardized platform to compare care across various facilities. These subjective assessments of patients' satisfaction with the healthcare they received have since been used to determine healthcare facility reimbursement. In recent years, healthcare administration has undergone a paradigm shift toward incentivizing higher PSSs for individual providers through compensation. This pilot study aims to evaluate this shift and investigate whether linking PSSs with provider compensation influences medical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quantitative pilot study, a 14-item survey, consisting of 10 Likert scale and 4 demographic questions, was disseminated to medical providers working in an urgent care setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All survey respondents affirmed that PSSs were utilized by their employer, and 85% agreed they were tied to compensation. Seventy percent of respondents changed their initial treatment plan, and 65% stated they changed how they interacted with patients based on feedback from their PSS; however, only 15% agreed that the use of PSSs has improved their medical care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results from this pilot study indicate that the use of PSSs may have a negative impact on healthcare providers' medical decision-making. This could drive up healthcare costs and negatively affect patient outcomes due to factors such as overprescribing and excessive diagnostic testing. Further research is also needed regarding the use of PSSs as a metric factor in provider compensation and development of more equitable patient care evaluation surveys to encourage appropriate evidence-based medical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":51812,"journal":{"name":"NURSE PRACTITIONER","volume":"50 8","pages":"35-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-driven? The influence of patient satisfaction scores on clinical decision-making.\",\"authors\":\"Stacie L Rothfus, Jennifer L Mabry\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.NPR.0000000000000345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient satisfaction scores (PSSs) were first introduced to enhance patient experiences and health outcomes and offer a standardized platform to compare care across various facilities. These subjective assessments of patients' satisfaction with the healthcare they received have since been used to determine healthcare facility reimbursement. In recent years, healthcare administration has undergone a paradigm shift toward incentivizing higher PSSs for individual providers through compensation. This pilot study aims to evaluate this shift and investigate whether linking PSSs with provider compensation influences medical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quantitative pilot study, a 14-item survey, consisting of 10 Likert scale and 4 demographic questions, was disseminated to medical providers working in an urgent care setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All survey respondents affirmed that PSSs were utilized by their employer, and 85% agreed they were tied to compensation. Seventy percent of respondents changed their initial treatment plan, and 65% stated they changed how they interacted with patients based on feedback from their PSS; however, only 15% agreed that the use of PSSs has improved their medical care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results from this pilot study indicate that the use of PSSs may have a negative impact on healthcare providers' medical decision-making. This could drive up healthcare costs and negatively affect patient outcomes due to factors such as overprescribing and excessive diagnostic testing. Further research is also needed regarding the use of PSSs as a metric factor in provider compensation and development of more equitable patient care evaluation surveys to encourage appropriate evidence-based medical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NURSE PRACTITIONER\",\"volume\":\"50 8\",\"pages\":\"35-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NURSE PRACTITIONER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000000000000345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSE PRACTITIONER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000000000000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:首次引入患者满意度评分(pss)是为了提高患者体验和健康结果,并提供一个标准化的平台来比较不同设施的护理。这些对患者对医疗保健服务满意度的主观评估已被用于确定医疗保健机构的报销。近年来,医疗保健管理经历了一种范式转变,即通过补偿来激励个体提供者获得更高的pss。这项试点研究旨在评估这种转变,并调查是否将pss与提供者补偿联系起来影响医疗决策。方法:在这个定量的试点研究中,一项14项调查,包括10个李克特量表和4个人口统计学问题,分发给在紧急护理环境中工作的医疗提供者。结果:所有的调查对象都确认他们的雇主使用了pss, 85%的人同意pss与薪酬挂钩。70%的受访者改变了他们最初的治疗计划,65%的受访者表示他们根据PSS的反馈改变了与患者的互动方式;然而,只有15%的人认为使用pss改善了他们的医疗保健。结论:本初步研究结果表明,pss的使用可能对医疗服务提供者的医疗决策产生负面影响。这可能会推高医疗成本,并由于处方过多和诊断测试过多等因素对患者的治疗结果产生负面影响。还需要进一步研究将pss作为提供者补偿的衡量因素,并开展更公平的患者护理评估调查,以鼓励适当的循证医疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-driven? The influence of patient satisfaction scores on clinical decision-making.

Background: Patient satisfaction scores (PSSs) were first introduced to enhance patient experiences and health outcomes and offer a standardized platform to compare care across various facilities. These subjective assessments of patients' satisfaction with the healthcare they received have since been used to determine healthcare facility reimbursement. In recent years, healthcare administration has undergone a paradigm shift toward incentivizing higher PSSs for individual providers through compensation. This pilot study aims to evaluate this shift and investigate whether linking PSSs with provider compensation influences medical decision-making.

Methods: In this quantitative pilot study, a 14-item survey, consisting of 10 Likert scale and 4 demographic questions, was disseminated to medical providers working in an urgent care setting.

Results: All survey respondents affirmed that PSSs were utilized by their employer, and 85% agreed they were tied to compensation. Seventy percent of respondents changed their initial treatment plan, and 65% stated they changed how they interacted with patients based on feedback from their PSS; however, only 15% agreed that the use of PSSs has improved their medical care.

Conclusion: Results from this pilot study indicate that the use of PSSs may have a negative impact on healthcare providers' medical decision-making. This could drive up healthcare costs and negatively affect patient outcomes due to factors such as overprescribing and excessive diagnostic testing. Further research is also needed regarding the use of PSSs as a metric factor in provider compensation and development of more equitable patient care evaluation surveys to encourage appropriate evidence-based medical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
期刊介绍: With a circulation of 20,000, The Nurse Practitioner is the leading monthly source for clinical, practical, cutting-edge information for advanced practice nurses and other primary care clinicians. Each issue presents peer-reviewed articles that range from clinical topics and research to political and practice issues. In addition, The Nurse Practitioner provides regular features, columns, continuing education, staff development education, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信