最后一年牙科学生牙髓治疗中抗生素使用模式:一项基于问卷的研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ahmet Demirhan Uygun, Seray Doğan
{"title":"最后一年牙科学生牙髓治疗中抗生素使用模式:一项基于问卷的研究。","authors":"Ahmet Demirhan Uygun, Seray Doğan","doi":"10.1002/jdd.14000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Turkey with 193 senior dental students to assess their antibiotic prescribing habits in endodontic scenarios. The survey included multiple-choice questions and 11 case-based scenarios evaluated on a five-point Likert scale. Qualitative data were summarized using numbers and percentages, while categorical data were analyzed using chi-square tests. Of the 587 students contacted, 193 (32.8%) responded; 60.1% were female. Most students prescribed recommended antibiotics such as amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (58%). Clindamycin was preferred in cases of penicillin allergy (45.6%); however, 9.4% of participants mistakenly selected penicillin derivatives, indicating a significant prescribing error. Inappropriate prescribing was also observed in clinical scenarios that did not involve systemic infection, particularly in non-indicated retreatment cases. A statistically significant gender-based difference was identified only in Scenario 9, which involved moderate to severe symptoms requiring root canal retreatment (p = 0.01). These findings indicated that students' clinical decision-making may be limited in some scenarios, pointing to potential areas for improvement in endodontic education. Educational interventions focusing on clinical reasoning in case-based scenarios and reinforcing guideline-based prescribing are strongly recommended to improve prescribing accuracy and reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Antibiotic Use for Endodontic Treatment Among Final-Year Dentistry Students: A Questionnaire-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Demirhan Uygun, Seray Doğan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jdd.14000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Turkey with 193 senior dental students to assess their antibiotic prescribing habits in endodontic scenarios. The survey included multiple-choice questions and 11 case-based scenarios evaluated on a five-point Likert scale. Qualitative data were summarized using numbers and percentages, while categorical data were analyzed using chi-square tests. Of the 587 students contacted, 193 (32.8%) responded; 60.1% were female. Most students prescribed recommended antibiotics such as amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (58%). Clindamycin was preferred in cases of penicillin allergy (45.6%); however, 9.4% of participants mistakenly selected penicillin derivatives, indicating a significant prescribing error. Inappropriate prescribing was also observed in clinical scenarios that did not involve systemic infection, particularly in non-indicated retreatment cases. A statistically significant gender-based difference was identified only in Scenario 9, which involved moderate to severe symptoms requiring root canal retreatment (p = 0.01). These findings indicated that students' clinical decision-making may be limited in some scenarios, pointing to potential areas for improvement in endodontic education. Educational interventions focusing on clinical reasoning in case-based scenarios and reinforcing guideline-based prescribing are strongly recommended to improve prescribing accuracy and reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.14000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.14000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在土耳其对193名高年级牙科学生进行了一项横断面调查,以评估他们在牙髓治疗情况下的抗生素处方习惯。这项调查包括多项选择题和11个基于案例的情景,以5分李克特量表进行评估。定性资料采用数字和百分比进行汇总,分类资料采用卡方检验进行分析。在联系的587名学生中,有193名(32.8%)回复;60.1%为女性。大多数学生使用阿莫西林+克拉维酸等推荐抗生素(58%)。青霉素过敏首选克林霉素(45.6%);然而,9.4%的参与者错误地选择了青霉素衍生物,这表明存在显著的处方错误。在不涉及全身感染的临床情况下,特别是在无指征的再治疗病例中,也观察到不适当的处方。仅在情景9中发现了统计学上显著的基于性别的差异,其中涉及中度至重度症状,需要根管再治疗(p = 0.01)。这些发现表明,在某些情况下,学生的临床决策可能受到限制,指出了牙髓教育的潜在改进领域。强烈建议采取教育干预措施,侧重于基于病例的临床推理,并加强基于指南的处方,以提高处方准确性,降低抗生素耐药性的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of Antibiotic Use for Endodontic Treatment Among Final-Year Dentistry Students: A Questionnaire-Based Study.

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Turkey with 193 senior dental students to assess their antibiotic prescribing habits in endodontic scenarios. The survey included multiple-choice questions and 11 case-based scenarios evaluated on a five-point Likert scale. Qualitative data were summarized using numbers and percentages, while categorical data were analyzed using chi-square tests. Of the 587 students contacted, 193 (32.8%) responded; 60.1% were female. Most students prescribed recommended antibiotics such as amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (58%). Clindamycin was preferred in cases of penicillin allergy (45.6%); however, 9.4% of participants mistakenly selected penicillin derivatives, indicating a significant prescribing error. Inappropriate prescribing was also observed in clinical scenarios that did not involve systemic infection, particularly in non-indicated retreatment cases. A statistically significant gender-based difference was identified only in Scenario 9, which involved moderate to severe symptoms requiring root canal retreatment (p = 0.01). These findings indicated that students' clinical decision-making may be limited in some scenarios, pointing to potential areas for improvement in endodontic education. Educational interventions focusing on clinical reasoning in case-based scenarios and reinforcing guideline-based prescribing are strongly recommended to improve prescribing accuracy and reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信