定义在确定非营利性医院社区福利水平中的意义。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Milbank Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-26 DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.70041
Hossein Zare, Gerard Anderson
{"title":"定义在确定非营利性医院社区福利水平中的意义。","authors":"Hossein Zare, Gerard Anderson","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy Points Nonprofit hospitals should be required to provide adequate documentation that allows the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to evaluate whether their reported activities genuinely qualify as community benefits. To enhance the current system, rigorous data reporting requirements must be established, including mandates for hospitals to report community benefits individually on Schedule H of Form 990, clearly demonstrating how these expenditures benefit each community. The IRS, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and public health authorities should work with hospitals to standardize definitions to improve accountability CONTEXT: The American Hospital Association determined that in 2022 nonprofit hospitals spent $129 billion on community benefits. This is more than the entire budget for the US public health service. Different organizations estimate different amounts of community benefit spending depending on their definition of community benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Schedule H from Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 data between 2019 and 2022 to determine the value of 17 components of community benefit and bad debt in nonprofit organizations. Using the descriptive analysis, this paper discusses the pros and cons of including certain categories of community benefit and suggests modifications to the definitions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In 2022, nonprofit hospitals spent $94 billion on all 17 categories of community benefit. This expenditure included $21 billion in services that benefited the patient directly, $33 billion on services that benefited the community, and $41 billion on Medicaid shortfall. Hospitals also spent $26 billion on bad debt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The value of community benefits varies significantly based on the definition used, even when the same data set is analyzed. Greater agreement on what community benefit means is necessary to ensure compliance with regulations regarding community benefit spending. This approach could involve coordination among the IRS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and public health authorities to enhance accountability when working with hospital associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49810,"journal":{"name":"Milbank Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"809-830"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12438450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Significance of Definitions in Determining the Level of Community Benefits for Nonprofit Hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Zare, Gerard Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-0009.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Policy Points Nonprofit hospitals should be required to provide adequate documentation that allows the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to evaluate whether their reported activities genuinely qualify as community benefits. To enhance the current system, rigorous data reporting requirements must be established, including mandates for hospitals to report community benefits individually on Schedule H of Form 990, clearly demonstrating how these expenditures benefit each community. The IRS, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and public health authorities should work with hospitals to standardize definitions to improve accountability CONTEXT: The American Hospital Association determined that in 2022 nonprofit hospitals spent $129 billion on community benefits. This is more than the entire budget for the US public health service. Different organizations estimate different amounts of community benefit spending depending on their definition of community benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Schedule H from Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 data between 2019 and 2022 to determine the value of 17 components of community benefit and bad debt in nonprofit organizations. Using the descriptive analysis, this paper discusses the pros and cons of including certain categories of community benefit and suggests modifications to the definitions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In 2022, nonprofit hospitals spent $94 billion on all 17 categories of community benefit. This expenditure included $21 billion in services that benefited the patient directly, $33 billion on services that benefited the community, and $41 billion on Medicaid shortfall. Hospitals also spent $26 billion on bad debt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The value of community benefits varies significantly based on the definition used, even when the same data set is analyzed. Greater agreement on what community benefit means is necessary to ensure compliance with regulations regarding community benefit spending. This approach could involve coordination among the IRS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and public health authorities to enhance accountability when working with hospital associations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milbank Quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"809-830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12438450/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milbank Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.70041\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.70041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政策要点:应要求非营利性医院提供足够的文件,以便美国国税局(IRS)评估其报告的活动是否真正符合社区福利。为了加强目前的系统,必须建立严格的数据报告要求,包括要求医院在表格990的附表H中单独报告社区福利,清楚地表明这些支出如何使每个社区受益。美国国税局、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心以及公共卫生当局应与医院合作,标准化定义,以提高问责制背景:美国医院协会确定,2022年,非营利医院在社区福利上花费了1290亿美元。这比美国公共卫生服务的全部预算还要多。不同的组织根据他们对社区福利的定义来估计不同的社区福利支出。方法:我们使用2019年至2022年美国国税局(IRS)表格990数据的附表H来确定非营利组织社区福利和坏账的17个组成部分的价值。本文采用描述性分析的方法,讨论了纳入某些社区利益类别的利弊,并提出了修改定义的建议。研究发现:2022年,非营利医院在所有17类社区福利上花费了940亿美元。其中210亿美元用于直接惠及患者的服务,330亿美元用于惠及社区的服务,410亿美元用于弥补医疗补助计划的不足。医院的坏账支出也高达260亿美元。结论:即使在分析相同的数据集时,根据所使用的定义,社区效益的价值也存在显著差异。有必要就社区福利意味着什么达成更大的共识,以确保遵守有关社区福利支出的规定。这种方法可能涉及国税局、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心以及公共卫生当局之间的协调,以加强与医院协会合作时的问责制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Significance of Definitions in Determining the Level of Community Benefits for Nonprofit Hospitals.

Policy Points Nonprofit hospitals should be required to provide adequate documentation that allows the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to evaluate whether their reported activities genuinely qualify as community benefits. To enhance the current system, rigorous data reporting requirements must be established, including mandates for hospitals to report community benefits individually on Schedule H of Form 990, clearly demonstrating how these expenditures benefit each community. The IRS, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and public health authorities should work with hospitals to standardize definitions to improve accountability CONTEXT: The American Hospital Association determined that in 2022 nonprofit hospitals spent $129 billion on community benefits. This is more than the entire budget for the US public health service. Different organizations estimate different amounts of community benefit spending depending on their definition of community benefit.

Methods: We used Schedule H from Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 data between 2019 and 2022 to determine the value of 17 components of community benefit and bad debt in nonprofit organizations. Using the descriptive analysis, this paper discusses the pros and cons of including certain categories of community benefit and suggests modifications to the definitions.

Findings: In 2022, nonprofit hospitals spent $94 billion on all 17 categories of community benefit. This expenditure included $21 billion in services that benefited the patient directly, $33 billion on services that benefited the community, and $41 billion on Medicaid shortfall. Hospitals also spent $26 billion on bad debt.

Conclusions: The value of community benefits varies significantly based on the definition used, even when the same data set is analyzed. Greater agreement on what community benefit means is necessary to ensure compliance with regulations regarding community benefit spending. This approach could involve coordination among the IRS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and public health authorities to enhance accountability when working with hospital associations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milbank Quarterly
Milbank Quarterly 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Milbank Quarterly is devoted to scholarly analysis of significant issues in health and health care policy. It presents original research, policy analysis, and commentary from academics, clinicians, and policymakers. The in-depth, multidisciplinary approach of the journal permits contributors to explore fully the social origins of health in our society and to examine in detail the implications of different health policies. Topics addressed in The Milbank Quarterly include the impact of social factors on health, prevention, allocation of health care resources, legal and ethical issues in health policy, health and health care administration, and the organization and financing of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信