探讨医疗保健专业人员参加瑞士伯尔尼大学两个研究生教育项目的动机:一项定性访谈研究。

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
GMS Journal for Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma001761
Melanie De la Rosa, Felix M Schmitz, Joana Berger-Estilita, Ara Tekian, Sissel Guttormsen
{"title":"探讨医疗保健专业人员参加瑞士伯尔尼大学两个研究生教育项目的动机:一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Melanie De la Rosa, Felix M Schmitz, Joana Berger-Estilita, Ara Tekian, Sissel Guttormsen","doi":"10.3205/zma001761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postgraduate education programs for healthcare professionals have seen rising demand due to socio-demographic shifts, digitalisation, and evolving healthcare models. This trend underscores the need for providers to offer high-quality, innovative teaching and learning opportunities that align with participants' needs and interests. Understanding the motivations behind enrolment is essential for tailoring curricula and didactical methods effectively. This study explores key motivational factors influencing healthcare professionals' decisions to join postgraduate education programs. The findings aim to inform curriculum planning to ensure that programs better meet the specific needs and interests of their learners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study with N=23 semi-structured interviews with 13 students from the Master's program in Medical Education (MAS) and 10 with students from the Certificate of Advanced Studies in Palliative Care (CAS). The interviews were thematically analysed to identify common and differentiating motivational factors, with coding conducted independently by two researchers to enhance reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study identified both general and program-specific motivational factors among MAS and CAS participants. MAS participants frequently mentioned career development, professional advancement, and empowerment as key motivations. CAS participants, on the other hand, placed greater emphasis on content-specific motivations. For both groups, local proximity and the education format played a crucial role in their decision to enrol in these programs. In addition, seven implications for program planning were identified to enhance the alignment of postgraduate education with participants' needs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With the method of qualitative analysis and the focus on post-graduate program-participants' needs and interests, new insights on motivation to attend postgraduate education were gained. The significance of these findings is supported by existing literature. Consequently, these results offer valuable implications for the planning and development of postgraduate education programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"42 3","pages":"Doc37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring healthcare professionals' motivation to attend two postgraduate education programs at the University of Bern in Switzerland: A qualitative interview study.\",\"authors\":\"Melanie De la Rosa, Felix M Schmitz, Joana Berger-Estilita, Ara Tekian, Sissel Guttormsen\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/zma001761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postgraduate education programs for healthcare professionals have seen rising demand due to socio-demographic shifts, digitalisation, and evolving healthcare models. This trend underscores the need for providers to offer high-quality, innovative teaching and learning opportunities that align with participants' needs and interests. Understanding the motivations behind enrolment is essential for tailoring curricula and didactical methods effectively. This study explores key motivational factors influencing healthcare professionals' decisions to join postgraduate education programs. The findings aim to inform curriculum planning to ensure that programs better meet the specific needs and interests of their learners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study with N=23 semi-structured interviews with 13 students from the Master's program in Medical Education (MAS) and 10 with students from the Certificate of Advanced Studies in Palliative Care (CAS). The interviews were thematically analysed to identify common and differentiating motivational factors, with coding conducted independently by two researchers to enhance reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study identified both general and program-specific motivational factors among MAS and CAS participants. MAS participants frequently mentioned career development, professional advancement, and empowerment as key motivations. CAS participants, on the other hand, placed greater emphasis on content-specific motivations. For both groups, local proximity and the education format played a crucial role in their decision to enrol in these programs. In addition, seven implications for program planning were identified to enhance the alignment of postgraduate education with participants' needs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With the method of qualitative analysis and the focus on post-graduate program-participants' needs and interests, new insights on motivation to attend postgraduate education were gained. The significance of these findings is supported by existing literature. Consequently, these results offer valuable implications for the planning and development of postgraduate education programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Journal for Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"Doc37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Journal for Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:由于社会人口结构的变化、数字化和不断发展的医疗模式,对医疗保健专业人员的研究生教育项目的需求不断增长。这一趋势强调了供应商需要提供符合参与者需求和兴趣的高质量、创新的教学和学习机会。了解招生背后的动机对于有效地调整课程和教学方法至关重要。本研究探讨影响医疗保健专业人员参加研究生教育计划的主要动机因素。研究结果旨在为课程规划提供信息,以确保课程更好地满足学习者的特定需求和兴趣。方法:对13名医学教育硕士(MAS)学生和10名姑息治疗高级证书(CAS)学生进行了N=23次半结构化访谈,进行了定性研究。对访谈进行主题分析,以确定共同和不同的动机因素,并由两位研究人员独立进行编码,以提高可靠性。结果:本研究确定了MAS和CAS参与者的一般动机因素和特定计划动机因素。MAS参与者经常提到职业发展、专业进步和授权是主要动机。另一方面,CAS参与者更强调具体内容的动机。对于这两组人来说,当地的邻近程度和教育形式在他们决定参加这些课程的过程中发挥了至关重要的作用。此外,还确定了项目规划的七个影响,以加强研究生教育与参与者需求的一致性。讨论:通过定性分析的方法和对研究生项目参与者需求和兴趣的关注,获得了参加研究生教育动机的新见解。这些发现的意义得到了现有文献的支持。因此,这些结果为研究生教育计划的规划和发展提供了有价值的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring healthcare professionals' motivation to attend two postgraduate education programs at the University of Bern in Switzerland: A qualitative interview study.

Exploring healthcare professionals' motivation to attend two postgraduate education programs at the University of Bern in Switzerland: A qualitative interview study.

Exploring healthcare professionals' motivation to attend two postgraduate education programs at the University of Bern in Switzerland: A qualitative interview study.

Introduction: Postgraduate education programs for healthcare professionals have seen rising demand due to socio-demographic shifts, digitalisation, and evolving healthcare models. This trend underscores the need for providers to offer high-quality, innovative teaching and learning opportunities that align with participants' needs and interests. Understanding the motivations behind enrolment is essential for tailoring curricula and didactical methods effectively. This study explores key motivational factors influencing healthcare professionals' decisions to join postgraduate education programs. The findings aim to inform curriculum planning to ensure that programs better meet the specific needs and interests of their learners.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study with N=23 semi-structured interviews with 13 students from the Master's program in Medical Education (MAS) and 10 with students from the Certificate of Advanced Studies in Palliative Care (CAS). The interviews were thematically analysed to identify common and differentiating motivational factors, with coding conducted independently by two researchers to enhance reliability.

Results: This study identified both general and program-specific motivational factors among MAS and CAS participants. MAS participants frequently mentioned career development, professional advancement, and empowerment as key motivations. CAS participants, on the other hand, placed greater emphasis on content-specific motivations. For both groups, local proximity and the education format played a crucial role in their decision to enrol in these programs. In addition, seven implications for program planning were identified to enhance the alignment of postgraduate education with participants' needs.

Discussion: With the method of qualitative analysis and the focus on post-graduate program-participants' needs and interests, new insights on motivation to attend postgraduate education were gained. The significance of these findings is supported by existing literature. Consequently, these results offer valuable implications for the planning and development of postgraduate education programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GMS Journal for Medical Education
GMS Journal for Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信