在多大程度上实现了本科医学教育的国家学习目标?初级保健住院医师横断面研究。

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
GMS Journal for Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma001762
Dorothea Dehnen, Kristina Flägel, Dorothea Wild, Jost Steinhäuser
{"title":"在多大程度上实现了本科医学教育的国家学习目标?初级保健住院医师横断面研究。","authors":"Dorothea Dehnen, Kristina Flägel, Dorothea Wild, Jost Steinhäuser","doi":"10.3205/zma001762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>2021 saw the publication of the new version (2.0) of the \"National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives (NKLM) in Undergraduate Medicine\", which in future will be closely linked to the German medical licensing regulations (ÄApprO). Included in the updated catalogue are specifically defined competencies concerning practical clinical skills. We aimed to determine how residents perceive their competency level to perform selected practical clinical skills in the NKLM 2.0.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In June 2022, all 593 medical residents registered at the competence centers for postgraduate training in primary care in North Rhine, Westphalia-Lippe and Schleswig-Holstein were invited to participate in an online survey. The participants were asked to retrospectively self-assess (1) their proficiency level (5-point Likert scale) at the beginning of their postgraduate training in regard to 36 practical clinical skills from the NKLM 2.0 and (2) where they had gained proficiency in those skills. Of the 164 participating residents, the main focus was on those who had been licensed for less than five years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses of 47 residents were analyzed. For 29 skills, at least 20% of the participants stated that these had not been proficiently mastered at the start of postgraduate training; e.g., examining the spine of an adult (19.6%) or the skin (37.0%). For 14 skills - such as examining female and male genitalia and those of newborns and infants - more than 50% of the participants indicated that they had not been able to perform these skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide initial evidence that discrepancies may exist between the level of desired competency by the end of undergraduate medical education, as specified by the NKLM, and the level of proficiency actually achieved in terms of practical clinical skills. More teaching and feedback methods may need to be established to impart these skills during undergraduate medical education and to integrate these skills into complex clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"42 3","pages":"Doc38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To what extent have national learning objectives in undergraduate medical education been achieved? A cross-sectional study of primary care residents.\",\"authors\":\"Dorothea Dehnen, Kristina Flägel, Dorothea Wild, Jost Steinhäuser\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/zma001762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>2021 saw the publication of the new version (2.0) of the \\\"National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives (NKLM) in Undergraduate Medicine\\\", which in future will be closely linked to the German medical licensing regulations (ÄApprO). Included in the updated catalogue are specifically defined competencies concerning practical clinical skills. We aimed to determine how residents perceive their competency level to perform selected practical clinical skills in the NKLM 2.0.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In June 2022, all 593 medical residents registered at the competence centers for postgraduate training in primary care in North Rhine, Westphalia-Lippe and Schleswig-Holstein were invited to participate in an online survey. The participants were asked to retrospectively self-assess (1) their proficiency level (5-point Likert scale) at the beginning of their postgraduate training in regard to 36 practical clinical skills from the NKLM 2.0 and (2) where they had gained proficiency in those skills. Of the 164 participating residents, the main focus was on those who had been licensed for less than five years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses of 47 residents were analyzed. For 29 skills, at least 20% of the participants stated that these had not been proficiently mastered at the start of postgraduate training; e.g., examining the spine of an adult (19.6%) or the skin (37.0%). For 14 skills - such as examining female and male genitalia and those of newborns and infants - more than 50% of the participants indicated that they had not been able to perform these skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide initial evidence that discrepancies may exist between the level of desired competency by the end of undergraduate medical education, as specified by the NKLM, and the level of proficiency actually achieved in terms of practical clinical skills. More teaching and feedback methods may need to be established to impart these skills during undergraduate medical education and to integrate these skills into complex clinical contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Journal for Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"Doc38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286870/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Journal for Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:2021年出版了新版(2.0)《本科医学基于能力的国家学习目标目录》(NKLM),未来将与德国医疗许可条例(ÄApprO)密切相关。在更新的目录中包括了关于临床实践技能的具体定义的能力。我们的目的是确定住院医师如何看待他们在NKLM 2.0中执行选定临床实践技能的能力水平。方法:于2022年6月,邀请在北莱茵州、威斯特伐利亚-利佩州和石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州初级保健研究生培训能力中心注册的593名住院医师参加在线调查。参与者被要求回顾性地自我评估(1)他们在研究生培训开始时对NKLM 2.0中的36项临床实践技能的熟练程度(5分李克特量表)和(2)他们在哪些地方熟练掌握了这些技能。在164名参与调查的居民中,主要关注的是那些获得执照不到五年的人。结果:对47名居民的反馈进行了分析。对于29项技能,至少有20%的参与者表示在研究生培训开始时没有熟练掌握;例如,检查成人的脊柱(19.6%)或皮肤(37.0%)。对于14项技能,例如检查女性和男性生殖器以及新生儿和婴儿的生殖器,超过50%的参与者表示他们不会这些技能。结论:这些结果提供了初步证据,表明NKLM规定的本科医学教育结束时期望的能力水平与实际临床实践技能的熟练程度之间可能存在差异。可能需要建立更多的教学和反馈方法,在本科医学教育中传授这些技能,并将这些技能整合到复杂的临床环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

To what extent have national learning objectives in undergraduate medical education been achieved? A cross-sectional study of primary care residents.

To what extent have national learning objectives in undergraduate medical education been achieved? A cross-sectional study of primary care residents.

To what extent have national learning objectives in undergraduate medical education been achieved? A cross-sectional study of primary care residents.

To what extent have national learning objectives in undergraduate medical education been achieved? A cross-sectional study of primary care residents.

Aim: 2021 saw the publication of the new version (2.0) of the "National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives (NKLM) in Undergraduate Medicine", which in future will be closely linked to the German medical licensing regulations (ÄApprO). Included in the updated catalogue are specifically defined competencies concerning practical clinical skills. We aimed to determine how residents perceive their competency level to perform selected practical clinical skills in the NKLM 2.0.

Method: In June 2022, all 593 medical residents registered at the competence centers for postgraduate training in primary care in North Rhine, Westphalia-Lippe and Schleswig-Holstein were invited to participate in an online survey. The participants were asked to retrospectively self-assess (1) their proficiency level (5-point Likert scale) at the beginning of their postgraduate training in regard to 36 practical clinical skills from the NKLM 2.0 and (2) where they had gained proficiency in those skills. Of the 164 participating residents, the main focus was on those who had been licensed for less than five years.

Results: The responses of 47 residents were analyzed. For 29 skills, at least 20% of the participants stated that these had not been proficiently mastered at the start of postgraduate training; e.g., examining the spine of an adult (19.6%) or the skin (37.0%). For 14 skills - such as examining female and male genitalia and those of newborns and infants - more than 50% of the participants indicated that they had not been able to perform these skills.

Conclusion: The results provide initial evidence that discrepancies may exist between the level of desired competency by the end of undergraduate medical education, as specified by the NKLM, and the level of proficiency actually achieved in terms of practical clinical skills. More teaching and feedback methods may need to be established to impart these skills during undergraduate medical education and to integrate these skills into complex clinical contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GMS Journal for Medical Education
GMS Journal for Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信