单孔三维视频辅助胸外科肺叶切除术对非小细胞肺癌患者术后疼痛和免疫功能的影响。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tumori Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1177/03008916251351217
Shaoxin Li, Lina Yang, Zheng Huang
{"title":"单孔三维视频辅助胸外科肺叶切除术对非小细胞肺癌患者术后疼痛和免疫功能的影响。","authors":"Shaoxin Li, Lina Yang, Zheng Huang","doi":"10.1177/03008916251351217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study focused on comparing the efficacy of uniportal three-dimensional (3D) video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and traditional two-dimensional (2D) VATS lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 84 NSCLC patients who underwent VATS lobectomy. Based on the type of thoracoscope used during surgery, patients were assigned to either the 3D group (n = 42), which received uniportal 3D VATS lobectomy, or the 2D group (n = 42), which underwent traditional 2D VATS lobectomy. Perioperative indicators, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, pain-related factors [substance P (SP), norepinephrine (NE), and cortisol (COR)], immune function (CD3<sup>+</sup>, CD4<sup>+</sup>, and CD8<sup>+</sup>), lung function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV)] were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D group exhibited lower intraoperative blood loss, postoperative 24-hour drainage volume, drainage tube indwelling time, surgery duration, and hospitalization time compared to the 2D group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Postoperatively, the 3D group reported lower VAS scores, lower levels of SP, NE, and COR, higher serum levels of CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup>, and higher FVC, FEV1, and MVV values compared to the 2D group (all <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uniportal 3D VATS lobectomy demonstrates clear advantages over traditional 2D VATS lobectomy for NSCLC patients by reducing perioperative pain, minimizing immune impairment, and preserving lung function.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"433-441"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of uniportal 3D video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy on postoperative pain and immune function in patients with NSCLC.\",\"authors\":\"Shaoxin Li, Lina Yang, Zheng Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03008916251351217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study focused on comparing the efficacy of uniportal three-dimensional (3D) video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and traditional two-dimensional (2D) VATS lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 84 NSCLC patients who underwent VATS lobectomy. Based on the type of thoracoscope used during surgery, patients were assigned to either the 3D group (n = 42), which received uniportal 3D VATS lobectomy, or the 2D group (n = 42), which underwent traditional 2D VATS lobectomy. Perioperative indicators, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, pain-related factors [substance P (SP), norepinephrine (NE), and cortisol (COR)], immune function (CD3<sup>+</sup>, CD4<sup>+</sup>, and CD8<sup>+</sup>), lung function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV)] were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D group exhibited lower intraoperative blood loss, postoperative 24-hour drainage volume, drainage tube indwelling time, surgery duration, and hospitalization time compared to the 2D group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Postoperatively, the 3D group reported lower VAS scores, lower levels of SP, NE, and COR, higher serum levels of CD3<sup>+</sup> and CD4<sup>+</sup>, and higher FVC, FEV1, and MVV values compared to the 2D group (all <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uniportal 3D VATS lobectomy demonstrates clear advantages over traditional 2D VATS lobectomy for NSCLC patients by reducing perioperative pain, minimizing immune impairment, and preserving lung function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tumori\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"433-441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tumori\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916251351217\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916251351217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较单门静脉三维(3D)胸腔镜肺叶切除术与传统二维(2D)胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析84例行VATS肺叶切除术的非小细胞肺癌患者。根据手术中使用的胸腔镜类型,将患者分为3D组(n = 42)和2D组(n = 42),前者接受单门静脉三维VATS肺叶切除术,后者接受传统2D VATS肺叶切除术。比较两组围手术期指标、术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、疼痛相关因素[P物质(SP)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)、皮质醇(COR)]、免疫功能(CD3+、CD4+、CD8+)、肺功能[用力肺活量(FVC)、1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、最大自主通气(MVV)]。结果:3D组术中出血量、术后24小时引流量、留置引流管时间、手术时间、住院时间均低于2D组(P < 0.05)。术后3D组VAS评分较2D组低,SP、NE、COR水平较低,血清CD3+、CD4+水平较高,FVC、FEV1、MVV值较2D组高(P < 0.05)。结论:Uniportal 3D VATS肺叶切除术与传统2D VATS肺叶切除术相比,在减轻NSCLC患者围手术期疼痛、减少免疫损伤和保留肺功能方面具有明显优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of uniportal 3D video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy on postoperative pain and immune function in patients with NSCLC.

Objective: This study focused on comparing the efficacy of uniportal three-dimensional (3D) video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and traditional two-dimensional (2D) VATS lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 84 NSCLC patients who underwent VATS lobectomy. Based on the type of thoracoscope used during surgery, patients were assigned to either the 3D group (n = 42), which received uniportal 3D VATS lobectomy, or the 2D group (n = 42), which underwent traditional 2D VATS lobectomy. Perioperative indicators, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, pain-related factors [substance P (SP), norepinephrine (NE), and cortisol (COR)], immune function (CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+), lung function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV)] were compared between the two groups.

Results: The 3D group exhibited lower intraoperative blood loss, postoperative 24-hour drainage volume, drainage tube indwelling time, surgery duration, and hospitalization time compared to the 2D group (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, the 3D group reported lower VAS scores, lower levels of SP, NE, and COR, higher serum levels of CD3+ and CD4+, and higher FVC, FEV1, and MVV values compared to the 2D group (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Uniportal 3D VATS lobectomy demonstrates clear advantages over traditional 2D VATS lobectomy for NSCLC patients by reducing perioperative pain, minimizing immune impairment, and preserving lung function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tumori
Tumori 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信