实体器官移植中无血管化直肌筋膜移植的长期结果:一项全球多中心IIRTA调查。

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001839
Nele Van De Winkel, Ewout Muylle, Emilio Canovai, Irum Amin, Andrew Butler, Rodrigo Vianna, Gennaro Selvaggi, Pablo Farinelli, Gabriel Gondolesi, Carmelo Loinaz, Iago Justo, Hector Vilca-Melendez, Ulrika Skogsberg Dahlgren, Gustaf Herlenius, Alireza Shamsaeefar, Hamed Nikoupour, Antoine Dubois, Marc Miserez, André D'Hoore, Robert Venick, Jacques Pirenne, Laurens J Ceulemans
{"title":"实体器官移植中无血管化直肌筋膜移植的长期结果:一项全球多中心IIRTA调查。","authors":"Nele Van De Winkel, Ewout Muylle, Emilio Canovai, Irum Amin, Andrew Butler, Rodrigo Vianna, Gennaro Selvaggi, Pablo Farinelli, Gabriel Gondolesi, Carmelo Loinaz, Iago Justo, Hector Vilca-Melendez, Ulrika Skogsberg Dahlgren, Gustaf Herlenius, Alireza Shamsaeefar, Hamed Nikoupour, Antoine Dubois, Marc Miserez, André D'Hoore, Robert Venick, Jacques Pirenne, Laurens J Ceulemans","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal wall (AW) closure after solid organ transplantation (SOT) is challenging in case of loss of abdominal domain and/or large-for-size grafts. Primary closure is crucial to avoid open abdomen-associated morbidity and mortality. Several techniques have been developed to address this challenge, including nonvascularized rectus fascia transplantation (NVRF Tx). Long-term outcome is missing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a multicenter survey to analyze the worldwide experience after NVRF Tx. International Intestinal Rehabilitation And Transplantation Association members were invited to participate to a questionnaire. The survey included all NVRF Tx performed after SOT. Questions were classified into pre-, intra-, and postoperative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29 responding centers, 8 performed NVRF Tx, comprising 98 patients in total. Thirty-two patients underwent multivisceral Tx (33.3%), 27 isolated intestinal Tx (28.1%), 21 combined liver-intestinal Tx (21.9%), 8 liver Tx (8.3%), 8 other SOT (8.3%), and 2 (2.0%) not reported. Thirty NVRF (30.9%) were from third-party donors. Thirty patients (31.3%) had surgical site infections. Seventy-one (74.0%) patients had reoperations, of them 18 (26.1%) patients had NVRF removal. Median follow-up time was 31 mo (10.0-63.5). Seventeen patients presented with bulging of the AW (18.7%), 5 with herniation (5.9%). No NVRF graft rejection was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey reports long-term outcome after NVRF Tx, with herniation in a limited number of patients, no suspicion of clinical rejection and no additional infection and mortality. NVRF Tx has proven to be a useful option, belonging to the standard armamentarium for AW closure after SOT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 8","pages":"e1839"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Outcome After Nonvascularized Rectus Fascia Transplantation in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Global Multicenter IIRTA Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Nele Van De Winkel, Ewout Muylle, Emilio Canovai, Irum Amin, Andrew Butler, Rodrigo Vianna, Gennaro Selvaggi, Pablo Farinelli, Gabriel Gondolesi, Carmelo Loinaz, Iago Justo, Hector Vilca-Melendez, Ulrika Skogsberg Dahlgren, Gustaf Herlenius, Alireza Shamsaeefar, Hamed Nikoupour, Antoine Dubois, Marc Miserez, André D'Hoore, Robert Venick, Jacques Pirenne, Laurens J Ceulemans\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal wall (AW) closure after solid organ transplantation (SOT) is challenging in case of loss of abdominal domain and/or large-for-size grafts. Primary closure is crucial to avoid open abdomen-associated morbidity and mortality. Several techniques have been developed to address this challenge, including nonvascularized rectus fascia transplantation (NVRF Tx). Long-term outcome is missing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a multicenter survey to analyze the worldwide experience after NVRF Tx. International Intestinal Rehabilitation And Transplantation Association members were invited to participate to a questionnaire. The survey included all NVRF Tx performed after SOT. Questions were classified into pre-, intra-, and postoperative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29 responding centers, 8 performed NVRF Tx, comprising 98 patients in total. Thirty-two patients underwent multivisceral Tx (33.3%), 27 isolated intestinal Tx (28.1%), 21 combined liver-intestinal Tx (21.9%), 8 liver Tx (8.3%), 8 other SOT (8.3%), and 2 (2.0%) not reported. Thirty NVRF (30.9%) were from third-party donors. Thirty patients (31.3%) had surgical site infections. Seventy-one (74.0%) patients had reoperations, of them 18 (26.1%) patients had NVRF removal. Median follow-up time was 31 mo (10.0-63.5). Seventeen patients presented with bulging of the AW (18.7%), 5 with herniation (5.9%). No NVRF graft rejection was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey reports long-term outcome after NVRF Tx, with herniation in a limited number of patients, no suspicion of clinical rejection and no additional infection and mortality. NVRF Tx has proven to be a useful option, belonging to the standard armamentarium for AW closure after SOT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"volume\":\"11 8\",\"pages\":\"e1839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289136/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实体器官移植(SOT)后腹壁(AW)闭合是具有挑战性的,在腹部区域丢失和/或大尺寸移植物的情况下。初次闭合对于避免腹部开放相关的发病率和死亡率至关重要。已经开发了几种技术来解决这一挑战,包括非血管化直肌筋膜移植(NVRF Tx)。长期的结果是缺失的。方法:我们设计了一项多中心调查,分析全球范围内NVRF Tx的经验。邀请国际肠道康复与移植协会成员参与问卷调查。该调查包括在SOT后进行的所有NVRF Tx。问题分为术前、术中和术后数据。结果:在29个应答中心中,8个进行了NVRF Tx,共98例患者。32例患者行多脏器Tx(33.3%), 27例单独肠Tx(28.1%), 21例肝肠联合Tx(21.9%), 8例肝脏Tx(8.3%), 8例其他SOT(8.3%), 2例未报道(2.0%)。30例NVRF(30.9%)来自第三方捐赠者。手术部位感染30例(31.3%)。71例(74.0%)患者再次手术,其中18例(26.1%)患者切除了NVRF。中位随访时间为31个月(10.0-63.5)。17例患者表现为腰侧肌膨出(18.7%),5例患者表现为疝出(5.9%)。无NVRF移植排斥反应报道。结论:该调查报告了NVRF Tx后的长期结果,在有限数量的患者中出现了疝,没有临床排斥反应,没有额外的感染和死亡。NVRF Tx已被证明是一个有用的选择,属于SOT后AW关闭的标准装备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Long-term Outcome After Nonvascularized Rectus Fascia Transplantation in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Global Multicenter IIRTA Survey.

Long-term Outcome After Nonvascularized Rectus Fascia Transplantation in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Global Multicenter IIRTA Survey.

Long-term Outcome After Nonvascularized Rectus Fascia Transplantation in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Global Multicenter IIRTA Survey.

Long-term Outcome After Nonvascularized Rectus Fascia Transplantation in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Global Multicenter IIRTA Survey.

Background: Abdominal wall (AW) closure after solid organ transplantation (SOT) is challenging in case of loss of abdominal domain and/or large-for-size grafts. Primary closure is crucial to avoid open abdomen-associated morbidity and mortality. Several techniques have been developed to address this challenge, including nonvascularized rectus fascia transplantation (NVRF Tx). Long-term outcome is missing.

Methods: We designed a multicenter survey to analyze the worldwide experience after NVRF Tx. International Intestinal Rehabilitation And Transplantation Association members were invited to participate to a questionnaire. The survey included all NVRF Tx performed after SOT. Questions were classified into pre-, intra-, and postoperative data.

Results: Of the 29 responding centers, 8 performed NVRF Tx, comprising 98 patients in total. Thirty-two patients underwent multivisceral Tx (33.3%), 27 isolated intestinal Tx (28.1%), 21 combined liver-intestinal Tx (21.9%), 8 liver Tx (8.3%), 8 other SOT (8.3%), and 2 (2.0%) not reported. Thirty NVRF (30.9%) were from third-party donors. Thirty patients (31.3%) had surgical site infections. Seventy-one (74.0%) patients had reoperations, of them 18 (26.1%) patients had NVRF removal. Median follow-up time was 31 mo (10.0-63.5). Seventeen patients presented with bulging of the AW (18.7%), 5 with herniation (5.9%). No NVRF graft rejection was reported.

Conclusions: This survey reports long-term outcome after NVRF Tx, with herniation in a limited number of patients, no suspicion of clinical rejection and no additional infection and mortality. NVRF Tx has proven to be a useful option, belonging to the standard armamentarium for AW closure after SOT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信