使用指南评估研究和评估II (AGREE II)工具对现行AIN管理指南进行评估。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Massimiliano Mistrangelo, Serena Mantova, Alberto Arezzo, Roberto Paolo Iachetta, Andrea Lauretta, Simone Arolfo, Marta Mozzon, Mario Morino, Paola De Nardi
{"title":"使用指南评估研究和评估II (AGREE II)工具对现行AIN管理指南进行评估。","authors":"Massimiliano Mistrangelo, Serena Mantova, Alberto Arezzo, Roberto Paolo Iachetta, Andrea Lauretta, Simone Arolfo, Marta Mozzon, Mario Morino, Paola De Nardi","doi":"10.1177/15533506251362905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimAnal Intraepithelial Neoplasia has been a hot topic in colorectal surgery and many Scientific Societies have produced guidelines for their diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to appraise the quality of the existing guidelines in this field.MethodsA systematic review of the Literature was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Scholar Google databases. Seven authors independently valued the quality of guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.ResultsThis study identified and included 9 guidelines of varying quality. The highest scoring guidelines were different considering each domain. NYSDOH ones gained the higher scoring in 2 domains. However, there was considerable variability across the studies and the various domains. The highest scoring domains were domain VI: Editorial Independence (median = 89% across all studies); IV: Clarity of Presentation (median = 61% across all studies) and domain I: Scope & Purpose (median = 59% across all studies). The lowest scores were observed in domain V: Applicability (22%) and domain III: Rigour of Development (29%). Only 2 of the 9 gained unanimous support for their use, whilst 5 guidelines were unanimously declared unsuitable for clinical use. The last 2 guidelines were considered beneficial only for limited purposes.Conclusions4 out of the 9 guidelines examined obtained moderate/good scores in various domains of the AGREE II tool. The review of the guidelines highlighted poor attention to stakeholder involvement and scarce care, mainly in the Rigour of development and Applicability of the guidelines. The AGREE II instrument could improve the drafting of new guidelines or help update published ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251362905"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appraisal of the Current Guidelines for the Management of AIN Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.\",\"authors\":\"Massimiliano Mistrangelo, Serena Mantova, Alberto Arezzo, Roberto Paolo Iachetta, Andrea Lauretta, Simone Arolfo, Marta Mozzon, Mario Morino, Paola De Nardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251362905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AimAnal Intraepithelial Neoplasia has been a hot topic in colorectal surgery and many Scientific Societies have produced guidelines for their diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to appraise the quality of the existing guidelines in this field.MethodsA systematic review of the Literature was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Scholar Google databases. Seven authors independently valued the quality of guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.ResultsThis study identified and included 9 guidelines of varying quality. The highest scoring guidelines were different considering each domain. NYSDOH ones gained the higher scoring in 2 domains. However, there was considerable variability across the studies and the various domains. The highest scoring domains were domain VI: Editorial Independence (median = 89% across all studies); IV: Clarity of Presentation (median = 61% across all studies) and domain I: Scope & Purpose (median = 59% across all studies). The lowest scores were observed in domain V: Applicability (22%) and domain III: Rigour of Development (29%). Only 2 of the 9 gained unanimous support for their use, whilst 5 guidelines were unanimously declared unsuitable for clinical use. The last 2 guidelines were considered beneficial only for limited purposes.Conclusions4 out of the 9 guidelines examined obtained moderate/good scores in various domains of the AGREE II tool. The review of the guidelines highlighted poor attention to stakeholder involvement and scarce care, mainly in the Rigour of development and Applicability of the guidelines. The AGREE II instrument could improve the drafting of new guidelines or help update published ones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15533506251362905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251362905\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251362905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上皮内瘤变一直是结直肠外科的热门话题,许多科学学会已经制定了诊断和治疗指南。本研究旨在评估该领域现有指南的质量。方法系统检索PubMed、EMBASE和Scholar谷歌数据库的相关文献。7位作者使用AGREE II工具独立评估指南的质量。结果本研究确定并纳入了9个不同质量的指南。考虑到每个领域,最高评分准则是不同的。NYSDOH组在2个域得分较高。然而,在研究和不同领域之间存在相当大的差异。得分最高的领域是第六领域:编辑独立性(所有研究的中位数= 89%);IV:陈述的清晰度(所有研究中位数= 61%)和领域I:范围和目的(所有研究中位数= 59%)。得分最低的是领域V:适用性(22%)和领域III:开发的严谨性(29%)。9个指南中只有2个获得了一致支持,而5个指南被一致宣布不适合临床使用。最后两个指南被认为只对有限的目的有益。结论:9个指南中有4个在AGREE II工具的各个领域获得了中等/良好的分数。对准则的审查突出了对利益相关者参与的关注不足和缺乏关注,主要是在准则制定的严谨性和适用性方面。第二期协议文书可以改进新准则的起草工作或帮助更新已出版的准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appraisal of the Current Guidelines for the Management of AIN Using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.

AimAnal Intraepithelial Neoplasia has been a hot topic in colorectal surgery and many Scientific Societies have produced guidelines for their diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to appraise the quality of the existing guidelines in this field.MethodsA systematic review of the Literature was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Scholar Google databases. Seven authors independently valued the quality of guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.ResultsThis study identified and included 9 guidelines of varying quality. The highest scoring guidelines were different considering each domain. NYSDOH ones gained the higher scoring in 2 domains. However, there was considerable variability across the studies and the various domains. The highest scoring domains were domain VI: Editorial Independence (median = 89% across all studies); IV: Clarity of Presentation (median = 61% across all studies) and domain I: Scope & Purpose (median = 59% across all studies). The lowest scores were observed in domain V: Applicability (22%) and domain III: Rigour of Development (29%). Only 2 of the 9 gained unanimous support for their use, whilst 5 guidelines were unanimously declared unsuitable for clinical use. The last 2 guidelines were considered beneficial only for limited purposes.Conclusions4 out of the 9 guidelines examined obtained moderate/good scores in various domains of the AGREE II tool. The review of the guidelines highlighted poor attention to stakeholder involvement and scarce care, mainly in the Rigour of development and Applicability of the guidelines. The AGREE II instrument could improve the drafting of new guidelines or help update published ones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信