在服务环境中调查丧亲支持的质量:一项对丧亲者使用认知访谈的试点研究。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1177/02692163251353012
Maja Furlan de Brito, Lucy E Selman, Alexandra Coelho, Barbara Gomes
{"title":"在服务环境中调查丧亲支持的质量:一项对丧亲者使用认知访谈的试点研究。","authors":"Maja Furlan de Brito, Lucy E Selman, Alexandra Coelho, Barbara Gomes","doi":"10.1177/02692163251353012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Provision of bereavement care is not standard practice in palliative care, meaning routinely collected data to understand support quality at a service level is scarce. Survey research can fill this gap.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To pilot and refine a survey and the survey method to measure the quality and variations in bereavement support at a service level.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cognitive interview study. In analysis we used a combination of reparative and descriptive cognitive interview approaches to ascertain measurement errors and any participation distress.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>People bereaved due to cancer (13-19 months post death) were consecutively recruited via a hospital-based palliative care service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty bereaved people participated (parental bereavement 8/20, partner 7/20, sibling 3/20, adult child 2/20); median age 59 (range 28-76), 6 men. Cancer deaths occurred 16-19 months before the interview. Identified measurement errors, mostly related to comprehension, were fixed. We refined the definition of bereavement support in the context of the survey and reordered the sections to reduce emotional burden and improve time completion. Participating in the survey was considered distressing yet personally valuable, relevant and important for improving bereavement support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed, piloted and refined a survey to assess quality and variations in bereavement support which can be used by palliative care services in clinical practice for quality improvement. Survey participation, while potentially distressing, was acceptable to and valued by bereaved people.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"884-896"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surveying the quality of bereavement support within a service setting: A pilot study using cognitive interviewing with bereaved people.\",\"authors\":\"Maja Furlan de Brito, Lucy E Selman, Alexandra Coelho, Barbara Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692163251353012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Provision of bereavement care is not standard practice in palliative care, meaning routinely collected data to understand support quality at a service level is scarce. Survey research can fill this gap.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To pilot and refine a survey and the survey method to measure the quality and variations in bereavement support at a service level.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cognitive interview study. In analysis we used a combination of reparative and descriptive cognitive interview approaches to ascertain measurement errors and any participation distress.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>People bereaved due to cancer (13-19 months post death) were consecutively recruited via a hospital-based palliative care service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty bereaved people participated (parental bereavement 8/20, partner 7/20, sibling 3/20, adult child 2/20); median age 59 (range 28-76), 6 men. Cancer deaths occurred 16-19 months before the interview. Identified measurement errors, mostly related to comprehension, were fixed. We refined the definition of bereavement support in the context of the survey and reordered the sections to reduce emotional burden and improve time completion. Participating in the survey was considered distressing yet personally valuable, relevant and important for improving bereavement support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed, piloted and refined a survey to assess quality and variations in bereavement support which can be used by palliative care services in clinical practice for quality improvement. Survey participation, while potentially distressing, was acceptable to and valued by bereaved people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"884-896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251353012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251353012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:提供丧亲关怀不是姑息治疗的标准做法,这意味着常规收集的数据来了解服务水平的支持质量是稀缺的。调查研究可以填补这一空白。目的:试点和完善一项调查和调查方法,以衡量服务水平上丧亲支持的质量和变化。设计:认知访谈研究。在分析中,我们使用了修复性和描述性认知访谈相结合的方法来确定测量误差和任何参与痛苦。环境/参与者:通过基于医院的姑息治疗服务连续招募因癌症而失去亲人的人(死亡后13-19个月)。结果:20名丧亲人员参与(父母丧亲8/20,伴侣丧亲7/20,兄弟姐妹丧亲3/20,成年子女丧亲2/20);中位年龄59岁(28-76岁),6名男性。癌症死亡发生在访谈前16-19个月。已确定的测量误差(主要与理解有关)得到了修正。我们在调查的背景下完善了丧亲支持的定义,并重新排序了章节,以减轻情绪负担,提高时间完成度。参与调查被认为是痛苦的,但对个人来说是有价值的,对改善丧亲支持是相关的和重要的。结论:我们开发、试点并完善了一项调查,以评估丧亲支持的质量和变化,该调查可用于姑息治疗服务的临床实践,以提高质量。参与调查,虽然可能令人痛苦,但被失去亲人的人所接受和重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Surveying the quality of bereavement support within a service setting: A pilot study using cognitive interviewing with bereaved people.

Surveying the quality of bereavement support within a service setting: A pilot study using cognitive interviewing with bereaved people.

Surveying the quality of bereavement support within a service setting: A pilot study using cognitive interviewing with bereaved people.

Surveying the quality of bereavement support within a service setting: A pilot study using cognitive interviewing with bereaved people.

Background: Provision of bereavement care is not standard practice in palliative care, meaning routinely collected data to understand support quality at a service level is scarce. Survey research can fill this gap.

Aim: To pilot and refine a survey and the survey method to measure the quality and variations in bereavement support at a service level.

Design: Cognitive interview study. In analysis we used a combination of reparative and descriptive cognitive interview approaches to ascertain measurement errors and any participation distress.

Setting/participants: People bereaved due to cancer (13-19 months post death) were consecutively recruited via a hospital-based palliative care service.

Results: Twenty bereaved people participated (parental bereavement 8/20, partner 7/20, sibling 3/20, adult child 2/20); median age 59 (range 28-76), 6 men. Cancer deaths occurred 16-19 months before the interview. Identified measurement errors, mostly related to comprehension, were fixed. We refined the definition of bereavement support in the context of the survey and reordered the sections to reduce emotional burden and improve time completion. Participating in the survey was considered distressing yet personally valuable, relevant and important for improving bereavement support.

Conclusions: We developed, piloted and refined a survey to assess quality and variations in bereavement support which can be used by palliative care services in clinical practice for quality improvement. Survey participation, while potentially distressing, was acceptable to and valued by bereaved people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信