Tiansheng Wang, Jeanny H Wang, Alan C Kinlaw, Richard Wyss, Virginia Pate, Zhuoyue Gou, John B Buse, Corinne A Keet, Michael R Kosorok, Til Stürmer
{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在哮喘加重中的应用:高维迭代因果森林识别亚群的应用。","authors":"Tiansheng Wang, Jeanny H Wang, Alan C Kinlaw, Richard Wyss, Virginia Pate, Zhuoyue Gou, John B Buse, Corinne A Keet, Michael R Kosorok, Til Stürmer","doi":"10.1002/pds.70192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1RA) may reduce asthma exacerbation (AE) risk, but it is unclear which populations benefit most. Recent pharmacoepidemiologic studies have employed iterative causal forest (iCF), a machine learning (ML) algorithm, to identify subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs). While iCF does not rely on prior knowledge of treatment-variable interactions, it may be constrained by missing or poorly defined variables in pharmacoepidemiologic studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the high-dimensional iterative causal forest (hdiCF)-a causal ML algorithm requiring predefined variables-to MarketScan 2016-2020 claims data to identify populations with asthma that might benefit most from GLP1RA in reducing AE risk. We built a GLP1RA vs. sulfonylurea new-user cohort with ≥ 1 inpatient or two outpatient asthma encounters, excluding patients with nonasthma indications for systemic steroids. The outcome was acute AE (hospital admission or emergency department visit for asthma), assessed over 6 months using 599 high-dimensional features from inpatient/outpatient services and pharmacy claims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the overall population, GLP1RA decreased AE risk relative to sulfonylurea: aRD -1.4% (-2.0%, -0.8%). hdiCF identified three subgroups based on the quantity of systemic steroid prescription fills (0, 1, and ≥ 2): patients with ≥ 2 prescriptions (GLP1RA: 34 events/1367 individuals; sulfonylurea: 53/1013) benefited most from GLP1RA: aRD -3.8% (-5.3%, -2.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates how automated feature identification can pinpoint clinically relevant subgroups with HTEs. The quantity of systemic steroid prescriptions, as a proxy for severe asthma, may guide personalized predictions of GLP1RA's short-term benefits on acute AE.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 8","pages":"e70192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Asthma Exacerbations: An Application of High-Dimensional Iterative Causal Forest to Identify Subgroups.\",\"authors\":\"Tiansheng Wang, Jeanny H Wang, Alan C Kinlaw, Richard Wyss, Virginia Pate, Zhuoyue Gou, John B Buse, Corinne A Keet, Michael R Kosorok, Til Stürmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1RA) may reduce asthma exacerbation (AE) risk, but it is unclear which populations benefit most. Recent pharmacoepidemiologic studies have employed iterative causal forest (iCF), a machine learning (ML) algorithm, to identify subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs). While iCF does not rely on prior knowledge of treatment-variable interactions, it may be constrained by missing or poorly defined variables in pharmacoepidemiologic studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the high-dimensional iterative causal forest (hdiCF)-a causal ML algorithm requiring predefined variables-to MarketScan 2016-2020 claims data to identify populations with asthma that might benefit most from GLP1RA in reducing AE risk. We built a GLP1RA vs. sulfonylurea new-user cohort with ≥ 1 inpatient or two outpatient asthma encounters, excluding patients with nonasthma indications for systemic steroids. The outcome was acute AE (hospital admission or emergency department visit for asthma), assessed over 6 months using 599 high-dimensional features from inpatient/outpatient services and pharmacy claims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the overall population, GLP1RA decreased AE risk relative to sulfonylurea: aRD -1.4% (-2.0%, -0.8%). hdiCF identified three subgroups based on the quantity of systemic steroid prescription fills (0, 1, and ≥ 2): patients with ≥ 2 prescriptions (GLP1RA: 34 events/1367 individuals; sulfonylurea: 53/1013) benefited most from GLP1RA: aRD -3.8% (-5.3%, -2.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates how automated feature identification can pinpoint clinically relevant subgroups with HTEs. The quantity of systemic steroid prescriptions, as a proxy for severe asthma, may guide personalized predictions of GLP1RA's short-term benefits on acute AE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"e70192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Asthma Exacerbations: An Application of High-Dimensional Iterative Causal Forest to Identify Subgroups.
Background: Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1RA) may reduce asthma exacerbation (AE) risk, but it is unclear which populations benefit most. Recent pharmacoepidemiologic studies have employed iterative causal forest (iCF), a machine learning (ML) algorithm, to identify subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs). While iCF does not rely on prior knowledge of treatment-variable interactions, it may be constrained by missing or poorly defined variables in pharmacoepidemiologic studies.
Methods: We applied the high-dimensional iterative causal forest (hdiCF)-a causal ML algorithm requiring predefined variables-to MarketScan 2016-2020 claims data to identify populations with asthma that might benefit most from GLP1RA in reducing AE risk. We built a GLP1RA vs. sulfonylurea new-user cohort with ≥ 1 inpatient or two outpatient asthma encounters, excluding patients with nonasthma indications for systemic steroids. The outcome was acute AE (hospital admission or emergency department visit for asthma), assessed over 6 months using 599 high-dimensional features from inpatient/outpatient services and pharmacy claims.
Results: In the overall population, GLP1RA decreased AE risk relative to sulfonylurea: aRD -1.4% (-2.0%, -0.8%). hdiCF identified three subgroups based on the quantity of systemic steroid prescription fills (0, 1, and ≥ 2): patients with ≥ 2 prescriptions (GLP1RA: 34 events/1367 individuals; sulfonylurea: 53/1013) benefited most from GLP1RA: aRD -3.8% (-5.3%, -2.2%).
Conclusions: This study demonstrates how automated feature identification can pinpoint clinically relevant subgroups with HTEs. The quantity of systemic steroid prescriptions, as a proxy for severe asthma, may guide personalized predictions of GLP1RA's short-term benefits on acute AE.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.