胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在哮喘加重中的应用:高维迭代因果森林识别亚群的应用。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tiansheng Wang, Jeanny H Wang, Alan C Kinlaw, Richard Wyss, Virginia Pate, Zhuoyue Gou, John B Buse, Corinne A Keet, Michael R Kosorok, Til Stürmer
{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在哮喘加重中的应用:高维迭代因果森林识别亚群的应用。","authors":"Tiansheng Wang, Jeanny H Wang, Alan C Kinlaw, Richard Wyss, Virginia Pate, Zhuoyue Gou, John B Buse, Corinne A Keet, Michael R Kosorok, Til Stürmer","doi":"10.1002/pds.70192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1RA) may reduce asthma exacerbation (AE) risk, but it is unclear which populations benefit most. Recent pharmacoepidemiologic studies have employed iterative causal forest (iCF), a machine learning (ML) algorithm, to identify subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs). While iCF does not rely on prior knowledge of treatment-variable interactions, it may be constrained by missing or poorly defined variables in pharmacoepidemiologic studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the high-dimensional iterative causal forest (hdiCF)-a causal ML algorithm requiring predefined variables-to MarketScan 2016-2020 claims data to identify populations with asthma that might benefit most from GLP1RA in reducing AE risk. We built a GLP1RA vs. sulfonylurea new-user cohort with ≥ 1 inpatient or two outpatient asthma encounters, excluding patients with nonasthma indications for systemic steroids. The outcome was acute AE (hospital admission or emergency department visit for asthma), assessed over 6 months using 599 high-dimensional features from inpatient/outpatient services and pharmacy claims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the overall population, GLP1RA decreased AE risk relative to sulfonylurea: aRD -1.4% (-2.0%, -0.8%). hdiCF identified three subgroups based on the quantity of systemic steroid prescription fills (0, 1, and ≥ 2): patients with ≥ 2 prescriptions (GLP1RA: 34 events/1367 individuals; sulfonylurea: 53/1013) benefited most from GLP1RA: aRD -3.8% (-5.3%, -2.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates how automated feature identification can pinpoint clinically relevant subgroups with HTEs. The quantity of systemic steroid prescriptions, as a proxy for severe asthma, may guide personalized predictions of GLP1RA's short-term benefits on acute AE.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 8","pages":"e70192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Asthma Exacerbations: An Application of High-Dimensional Iterative Causal Forest to Identify Subgroups.\",\"authors\":\"Tiansheng Wang, Jeanny H Wang, Alan C Kinlaw, Richard Wyss, Virginia Pate, Zhuoyue Gou, John B Buse, Corinne A Keet, Michael R Kosorok, Til Stürmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1RA) may reduce asthma exacerbation (AE) risk, but it is unclear which populations benefit most. Recent pharmacoepidemiologic studies have employed iterative causal forest (iCF), a machine learning (ML) algorithm, to identify subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs). While iCF does not rely on prior knowledge of treatment-variable interactions, it may be constrained by missing or poorly defined variables in pharmacoepidemiologic studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the high-dimensional iterative causal forest (hdiCF)-a causal ML algorithm requiring predefined variables-to MarketScan 2016-2020 claims data to identify populations with asthma that might benefit most from GLP1RA in reducing AE risk. We built a GLP1RA vs. sulfonylurea new-user cohort with ≥ 1 inpatient or two outpatient asthma encounters, excluding patients with nonasthma indications for systemic steroids. The outcome was acute AE (hospital admission or emergency department visit for asthma), assessed over 6 months using 599 high-dimensional features from inpatient/outpatient services and pharmacy claims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the overall population, GLP1RA decreased AE risk relative to sulfonylurea: aRD -1.4% (-2.0%, -0.8%). hdiCF identified three subgroups based on the quantity of systemic steroid prescription fills (0, 1, and ≥ 2): patients with ≥ 2 prescriptions (GLP1RA: 34 events/1367 individuals; sulfonylurea: 53/1013) benefited most from GLP1RA: aRD -3.8% (-5.3%, -2.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates how automated feature identification can pinpoint clinically relevant subgroups with HTEs. The quantity of systemic steroid prescriptions, as a proxy for severe asthma, may guide personalized predictions of GLP1RA's short-term benefits on acute AE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"e70192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1RA)可能降低哮喘恶化(AE)的风险,但目前尚不清楚哪些人群受益最多。最近的药物流行病学研究使用了迭代因果森林(iCF),一种机器学习(ML)算法来识别具有异质性治疗效果(hte)的亚群。虽然iCF不依赖于治疗变量相互作用的先验知识,但它可能受到药物流行病学研究中缺失或定义不清的变量的限制。方法:我们将高维迭代因果森林(hdiCF)-一种需要预定义变量的因果ML算法-应用于MarketScan 2016-2020索赔数据,以确定可能从GLP1RA降低AE风险中获益最多的哮喘人群。我们建立了GLP1RA与磺酰脲新使用者队列,患者≥1例住院或2例门诊哮喘患者,排除了非哮喘适应症的全体性类固醇患者。结果是急性AE(因哮喘住院或急诊就诊),在6个月内使用住院/门诊服务和药房索赔的599个高维特征进行评估。结果:在总体人群中,GLP1RA相对于磺酰脲降低AE风险:-1.4%(-2.0%,-0.8%)。hdiCF根据系统性类固醇处方填充量(0、1和≥2)确定了三个亚组:处方≥2的患者(GLP1RA: 34例/1367例;sulfonylurea: 53/1013)从GLP1RA获益最多:ad -3.8%(-5.3%, -2.2%)。结论:这项研究证明了自动特征识别可以精确定位hte临床相关亚群。系统性类固醇处方的数量,作为严重哮喘的代表,可以指导个性化预测GLP1RA对急性AE的短期益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Asthma Exacerbations: An Application of High-Dimensional Iterative Causal Forest to Identify Subgroups.

Background: Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1RA) may reduce asthma exacerbation (AE) risk, but it is unclear which populations benefit most. Recent pharmacoepidemiologic studies have employed iterative causal forest (iCF), a machine learning (ML) algorithm, to identify subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs). While iCF does not rely on prior knowledge of treatment-variable interactions, it may be constrained by missing or poorly defined variables in pharmacoepidemiologic studies.

Methods: We applied the high-dimensional iterative causal forest (hdiCF)-a causal ML algorithm requiring predefined variables-to MarketScan 2016-2020 claims data to identify populations with asthma that might benefit most from GLP1RA in reducing AE risk. We built a GLP1RA vs. sulfonylurea new-user cohort with ≥ 1 inpatient or two outpatient asthma encounters, excluding patients with nonasthma indications for systemic steroids. The outcome was acute AE (hospital admission or emergency department visit for asthma), assessed over 6 months using 599 high-dimensional features from inpatient/outpatient services and pharmacy claims.

Results: In the overall population, GLP1RA decreased AE risk relative to sulfonylurea: aRD -1.4% (-2.0%, -0.8%). hdiCF identified three subgroups based on the quantity of systemic steroid prescription fills (0, 1, and ≥ 2): patients with ≥ 2 prescriptions (GLP1RA: 34 events/1367 individuals; sulfonylurea: 53/1013) benefited most from GLP1RA: aRD -3.8% (-5.3%, -2.2%).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates how automated feature identification can pinpoint clinically relevant subgroups with HTEs. The quantity of systemic steroid prescriptions, as a proxy for severe asthma, may guide personalized predictions of GLP1RA's short-term benefits on acute AE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信