接受Golimumab治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者结肠切除术和肿瘤预后:一项使用西班牙ENEIDA注册中心的授权后安全性研究

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Eugeni Domènech, Joan Fortuny, David Martínez, Anita Tormos, Zhiping Huang, Deanna D Hill, Cindy Weinstein, Suzan Esslinger, Alexis A Krumme, Marijo Otero-Lobato, Daniel Mines, Javier P Gisbert
{"title":"接受Golimumab治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者结肠切除术和肿瘤预后:一项使用西班牙ENEIDA注册中心的授权后安全性研究","authors":"Eugeni Domènech, Joan Fortuny, David Martínez, Anita Tormos, Zhiping Huang, Deanna D Hill, Cindy Weinstein, Suzan Esslinger, Alexis A Krumme, Marijo Otero-Lobato, Daniel Mines, Javier P Gisbert","doi":"10.1002/pds.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Golimumab (GLM), an anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agent, is indicated for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). This post-authorisation safety study evaluated the risk of colectomy due to intractable disease and advanced colonic neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and/or colorectal cancer) under real-world conditions of GLM use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This bidirectional cohort study using Spanish ENEIDA registry data (2013-2022) included adults with UC who initiated GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, or thiopurines (TPs). Crude risk analyses-and, when feasible, multivariable models-in cohort and nested case-control designs were performed. For colectomy, we evaluated exposure to GLM only, other anti-TNFα agents, and both (i.e., overlapping exposure). For ACN, we evaluated exposure to GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, and TPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four colectomy cases and 10 ACN cases were identified among patients exposed to GLM (N = 474), other anti-TNFα agents (N = 1737), or TPs (N = 1380). Incidence rates per 1000 person-years and 95% confidence intervals were reported for colectomy (GLM-only [4.4, 1.2-11.2] and other anti-TNFα agents only [12.4, 9.1-16.5]) and ACN (GLM [1.5, 0.2-5.4], other anti-TNFα agents [1.3, 0.5-2.8], and TPs [1.0, 0.3-2.6]). In comparisons excluding overlapping exposure, GLM was not associated with an increased risk of colectomy versus other anti-TNFα agents. GLM was also not associated with an increased risk of ACN versus either comparator. Observed events, especially for ACN, were limited for all exposures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings do not indicate an increased risk of colectomy due to intractable disease or ACN with GLM use versus other therapies for similar disease severity in routine UC care (EUPAS15752).</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 8","pages":"e70176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colectomy and Neoplasia Outcomes of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Golimumab: A Post-Authorisation Safety Study Using the Spanish ENEIDA Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Eugeni Domènech, Joan Fortuny, David Martínez, Anita Tormos, Zhiping Huang, Deanna D Hill, Cindy Weinstein, Suzan Esslinger, Alexis A Krumme, Marijo Otero-Lobato, Daniel Mines, Javier P Gisbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Golimumab (GLM), an anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agent, is indicated for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). This post-authorisation safety study evaluated the risk of colectomy due to intractable disease and advanced colonic neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and/or colorectal cancer) under real-world conditions of GLM use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This bidirectional cohort study using Spanish ENEIDA registry data (2013-2022) included adults with UC who initiated GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, or thiopurines (TPs). Crude risk analyses-and, when feasible, multivariable models-in cohort and nested case-control designs were performed. For colectomy, we evaluated exposure to GLM only, other anti-TNFα agents, and both (i.e., overlapping exposure). For ACN, we evaluated exposure to GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, and TPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four colectomy cases and 10 ACN cases were identified among patients exposed to GLM (N = 474), other anti-TNFα agents (N = 1737), or TPs (N = 1380). Incidence rates per 1000 person-years and 95% confidence intervals were reported for colectomy (GLM-only [4.4, 1.2-11.2] and other anti-TNFα agents only [12.4, 9.1-16.5]) and ACN (GLM [1.5, 0.2-5.4], other anti-TNFα agents [1.3, 0.5-2.8], and TPs [1.0, 0.3-2.6]). In comparisons excluding overlapping exposure, GLM was not associated with an increased risk of colectomy versus other anti-TNFα agents. GLM was also not associated with an increased risk of ACN versus either comparator. Observed events, especially for ACN, were limited for all exposures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings do not indicate an increased risk of colectomy due to intractable disease or ACN with GLM use versus other therapies for similar disease severity in routine UC care (EUPAS15752).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"e70176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Golimumab (GLM)是一种抗肿瘤坏死因子α (anti-TNFα)药物,适用于中重度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。这项授权后安全性研究评估了在使用GLM的真实条件下,由于顽固性疾病和晚期结肠肿瘤(高级别不典型增生和/或结直肠癌)导致结肠切除术的风险。方法:这项使用西班牙ENEIDA注册数据(2013-2022)的双向队列研究纳入了接受GLM、其他抗tnf α药物或硫嘌呤(TPs)治疗的UC成人患者。在队列和嵌套病例对照设计中进行了粗略的风险分析,并在可行的情况下使用多变量模型。对于结肠切除术,我们评估了仅暴露于GLM,其他抗tnf α药物,以及两者(即重叠暴露)。对于ACN,我们评估了GLM、其他抗tnf α药物和tp的暴露情况。结果:在暴露于GLM (N = 474)、其他抗tnf α药物(N = 1737)或TPs (N = 1380)的患者中,共发现64例结肠切除术病例和10例ACN病例。报告了结肠切除术(仅GLM[4.4, 1.2-11.2]和其他抗tnf - α药物[12.4,9.1-16.5])和ACN (GLM[1.5, 0.2-5.4],其他抗tnf - α药物[1.3,0.5-2.8]和TPs[1.0, 0.3-2.6])的每1000人年发病率和95%置信区间。在排除重叠暴露的比较中,与其他抗tnf α药物相比,GLM与结肠切除术风险增加无关。GLM也与ACN的风险增加无关。观察到的事件,特别是ACN,在所有暴露中都是有限的。结论:研究结果并不表明在常规UC护理中,使用GLM与其他治疗类似疾病严重程度的治疗相比,由于顽固性疾病或ACN导致结肠切除术的风险增加(EUPAS15752)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Colectomy and Neoplasia Outcomes of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Golimumab: A Post-Authorisation Safety Study Using the Spanish ENEIDA Registry.

Colectomy and Neoplasia Outcomes of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Golimumab: A Post-Authorisation Safety Study Using the Spanish ENEIDA Registry.

Purpose: Golimumab (GLM), an anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agent, is indicated for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). This post-authorisation safety study evaluated the risk of colectomy due to intractable disease and advanced colonic neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and/or colorectal cancer) under real-world conditions of GLM use.

Methods: This bidirectional cohort study using Spanish ENEIDA registry data (2013-2022) included adults with UC who initiated GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, or thiopurines (TPs). Crude risk analyses-and, when feasible, multivariable models-in cohort and nested case-control designs were performed. For colectomy, we evaluated exposure to GLM only, other anti-TNFα agents, and both (i.e., overlapping exposure). For ACN, we evaluated exposure to GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, and TPs.

Results: Sixty-four colectomy cases and 10 ACN cases were identified among patients exposed to GLM (N = 474), other anti-TNFα agents (N = 1737), or TPs (N = 1380). Incidence rates per 1000 person-years and 95% confidence intervals were reported for colectomy (GLM-only [4.4, 1.2-11.2] and other anti-TNFα agents only [12.4, 9.1-16.5]) and ACN (GLM [1.5, 0.2-5.4], other anti-TNFα agents [1.3, 0.5-2.8], and TPs [1.0, 0.3-2.6]). In comparisons excluding overlapping exposure, GLM was not associated with an increased risk of colectomy versus other anti-TNFα agents. GLM was also not associated with an increased risk of ACN versus either comparator. Observed events, especially for ACN, were limited for all exposures.

Conclusions: Findings do not indicate an increased risk of colectomy due to intractable disease or ACN with GLM use versus other therapies for similar disease severity in routine UC care (EUPAS15752).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信