Eugeni Domènech, Joan Fortuny, David Martínez, Anita Tormos, Zhiping Huang, Deanna D Hill, Cindy Weinstein, Suzan Esslinger, Alexis A Krumme, Marijo Otero-Lobato, Daniel Mines, Javier P Gisbert
{"title":"接受Golimumab治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者结肠切除术和肿瘤预后:一项使用西班牙ENEIDA注册中心的授权后安全性研究","authors":"Eugeni Domènech, Joan Fortuny, David Martínez, Anita Tormos, Zhiping Huang, Deanna D Hill, Cindy Weinstein, Suzan Esslinger, Alexis A Krumme, Marijo Otero-Lobato, Daniel Mines, Javier P Gisbert","doi":"10.1002/pds.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Golimumab (GLM), an anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agent, is indicated for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). This post-authorisation safety study evaluated the risk of colectomy due to intractable disease and advanced colonic neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and/or colorectal cancer) under real-world conditions of GLM use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This bidirectional cohort study using Spanish ENEIDA registry data (2013-2022) included adults with UC who initiated GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, or thiopurines (TPs). Crude risk analyses-and, when feasible, multivariable models-in cohort and nested case-control designs were performed. For colectomy, we evaluated exposure to GLM only, other anti-TNFα agents, and both (i.e., overlapping exposure). For ACN, we evaluated exposure to GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, and TPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four colectomy cases and 10 ACN cases were identified among patients exposed to GLM (N = 474), other anti-TNFα agents (N = 1737), or TPs (N = 1380). Incidence rates per 1000 person-years and 95% confidence intervals were reported for colectomy (GLM-only [4.4, 1.2-11.2] and other anti-TNFα agents only [12.4, 9.1-16.5]) and ACN (GLM [1.5, 0.2-5.4], other anti-TNFα agents [1.3, 0.5-2.8], and TPs [1.0, 0.3-2.6]). In comparisons excluding overlapping exposure, GLM was not associated with an increased risk of colectomy versus other anti-TNFα agents. GLM was also not associated with an increased risk of ACN versus either comparator. Observed events, especially for ACN, were limited for all exposures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings do not indicate an increased risk of colectomy due to intractable disease or ACN with GLM use versus other therapies for similar disease severity in routine UC care (EUPAS15752).</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 8","pages":"e70176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colectomy and Neoplasia Outcomes of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Golimumab: A Post-Authorisation Safety Study Using the Spanish ENEIDA Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Eugeni Domènech, Joan Fortuny, David Martínez, Anita Tormos, Zhiping Huang, Deanna D Hill, Cindy Weinstein, Suzan Esslinger, Alexis A Krumme, Marijo Otero-Lobato, Daniel Mines, Javier P Gisbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pds.70176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Golimumab (GLM), an anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agent, is indicated for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). This post-authorisation safety study evaluated the risk of colectomy due to intractable disease and advanced colonic neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and/or colorectal cancer) under real-world conditions of GLM use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This bidirectional cohort study using Spanish ENEIDA registry data (2013-2022) included adults with UC who initiated GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, or thiopurines (TPs). Crude risk analyses-and, when feasible, multivariable models-in cohort and nested case-control designs were performed. For colectomy, we evaluated exposure to GLM only, other anti-TNFα agents, and both (i.e., overlapping exposure). For ACN, we evaluated exposure to GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, and TPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four colectomy cases and 10 ACN cases were identified among patients exposed to GLM (N = 474), other anti-TNFα agents (N = 1737), or TPs (N = 1380). Incidence rates per 1000 person-years and 95% confidence intervals were reported for colectomy (GLM-only [4.4, 1.2-11.2] and other anti-TNFα agents only [12.4, 9.1-16.5]) and ACN (GLM [1.5, 0.2-5.4], other anti-TNFα agents [1.3, 0.5-2.8], and TPs [1.0, 0.3-2.6]). In comparisons excluding overlapping exposure, GLM was not associated with an increased risk of colectomy versus other anti-TNFα agents. GLM was also not associated with an increased risk of ACN versus either comparator. Observed events, especially for ACN, were limited for all exposures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings do not indicate an increased risk of colectomy due to intractable disease or ACN with GLM use versus other therapies for similar disease severity in routine UC care (EUPAS15752).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"e70176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70176\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Colectomy and Neoplasia Outcomes of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Golimumab: A Post-Authorisation Safety Study Using the Spanish ENEIDA Registry.
Purpose: Golimumab (GLM), an anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agent, is indicated for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). This post-authorisation safety study evaluated the risk of colectomy due to intractable disease and advanced colonic neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and/or colorectal cancer) under real-world conditions of GLM use.
Methods: This bidirectional cohort study using Spanish ENEIDA registry data (2013-2022) included adults with UC who initiated GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, or thiopurines (TPs). Crude risk analyses-and, when feasible, multivariable models-in cohort and nested case-control designs were performed. For colectomy, we evaluated exposure to GLM only, other anti-TNFα agents, and both (i.e., overlapping exposure). For ACN, we evaluated exposure to GLM, other anti-TNFα agents, and TPs.
Results: Sixty-four colectomy cases and 10 ACN cases were identified among patients exposed to GLM (N = 474), other anti-TNFα agents (N = 1737), or TPs (N = 1380). Incidence rates per 1000 person-years and 95% confidence intervals were reported for colectomy (GLM-only [4.4, 1.2-11.2] and other anti-TNFα agents only [12.4, 9.1-16.5]) and ACN (GLM [1.5, 0.2-5.4], other anti-TNFα agents [1.3, 0.5-2.8], and TPs [1.0, 0.3-2.6]). In comparisons excluding overlapping exposure, GLM was not associated with an increased risk of colectomy versus other anti-TNFα agents. GLM was also not associated with an increased risk of ACN versus either comparator. Observed events, especially for ACN, were limited for all exposures.
Conclusions: Findings do not indicate an increased risk of colectomy due to intractable disease or ACN with GLM use versus other therapies for similar disease severity in routine UC care (EUPAS15752).
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.