靶向子宫内膜异位症治疗对中枢致敏患者的影响:系统评价和Meta分析。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Adriana Gomez-Llerena, Pallavi Shekawat, Aishwarya Pradeep, Victoria L Clifton, Sherif A El Nashar, Aakriti R Carrubba
{"title":"靶向子宫内膜异位症治疗对中枢致敏患者的影响:系统评价和Meta分析。","authors":"Adriana Gomez-Llerena, Pallavi Shekawat, Aishwarya Pradeep, Victoria L Clifton, Sherif A El Nashar, Aakriti R Carrubba","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.07.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Central sensitization (CSS), a condition where the central nervous system amplifies pain signals, may impact response to treatment of chronic pain conditions. The objective of this study is to determine if CSS affects outcomes after medical or surgical treatment for women with endometriosis via a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Emerging Sources Citation Index was conducted without language or date restrictions. The search strategy utilized MeSH and EMTREE terms to capture concepts related to central sensitization, endometriosis, and associated symptoms like dysmenorrhea. Interventions in the reviewed studies included medical treatment or surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Studies reporting on endometriosis outcomes in women with and wihout CSS were included in the review. We excluded studies which primarily focused on non-endometriosis pelvic pain syndromes. A total of 1821 abstracts were identified, and 259 full texts were reviewed for eligibility. Five studies met inclusion criteria encompassing a total of 1271 patients. Data for meta-analysis was not available for one study and another study was excluded as it was the only one describing medical treatment. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess quality and risk of bias. Results were sythesized using random effect meta-anlayses to estimate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confience using the DerSimmonian and Laird methods.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>The percentage of patients with CSS ranged from 28.3% to 80.2%. Patients with CSS have smaller changes in pain scores after endometriosis surgery (RR 0.79, confidence interval 0.73-0.86) and significantly higher persistent pain (RR 2.27, confidence interval 1.40-3.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher baseline catastrophization is associated with worse outcomes in women undergoing treatment for endometriosis. This is important to consider during counseling and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Targeted Endometriosis Treatment On Patients with Central Sensitization: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Gomez-Llerena, Pallavi Shekawat, Aishwarya Pradeep, Victoria L Clifton, Sherif A El Nashar, Aakriti R Carrubba\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.07.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Central sensitization (CSS), a condition where the central nervous system amplifies pain signals, may impact response to treatment of chronic pain conditions. The objective of this study is to determine if CSS affects outcomes after medical or surgical treatment for women with endometriosis via a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Emerging Sources Citation Index was conducted without language or date restrictions. The search strategy utilized MeSH and EMTREE terms to capture concepts related to central sensitization, endometriosis, and associated symptoms like dysmenorrhea. Interventions in the reviewed studies included medical treatment or surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Studies reporting on endometriosis outcomes in women with and wihout CSS were included in the review. We excluded studies which primarily focused on non-endometriosis pelvic pain syndromes. A total of 1821 abstracts were identified, and 259 full texts were reviewed for eligibility. Five studies met inclusion criteria encompassing a total of 1271 patients. Data for meta-analysis was not available for one study and another study was excluded as it was the only one describing medical treatment. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess quality and risk of bias. Results were sythesized using random effect meta-anlayses to estimate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confience using the DerSimmonian and Laird methods.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>The percentage of patients with CSS ranged from 28.3% to 80.2%. Patients with CSS have smaller changes in pain scores after endometriosis surgery (RR 0.79, confidence interval 0.73-0.86) and significantly higher persistent pain (RR 2.27, confidence interval 1.40-3.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher baseline catastrophization is associated with worse outcomes in women undergoing treatment for endometriosis. This is important to consider during counseling and decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.07.020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.07.020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:中枢致敏(CSS)是一种中枢神经系统放大疼痛信号的情况,可能影响对慢性疼痛治疗的反应。本研究的目的是通过系统回顾和荟萃分析来确定CSS是否会影响子宫内膜异位症患者接受药物或手术治疗后的预后。数据来源:使用MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、科学引文索引扩展和新兴来源引文索引进行系统文献检索,无语言和日期限制。搜索策略利用MeSH和EMTREE术语来捕获与中枢致敏、子宫内膜异位症和痛经等相关症状相关的概念。在审查的研究中,干预措施包括药物治疗或手术。研究方法选择:研究报告了子宫内膜异位症的结果在有和没有CSS的妇女被纳入审查。我们排除了主要关注非子宫内膜异位症盆腔疼痛综合征的研究。共有1821篇摘要被确定,259篇全文被审查是否符合资格。5项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入1271例患者。一项研究没有meta分析的数据,另一项研究被排除在外,因为它是唯一描述药物治疗的研究。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估质量和偏倚风险。采用随机效应荟萃分析综合结果,采用DerSimmonian和Laird方法估计合并风险比(RR)和95%置信度。表格、整合和结果:CSS患者的百分比从28.3%%到80.2%不等。CSS患者子宫内膜异位症术后疼痛评分变化较小(RR 0.79,可信区间0.73 ~ 0.86),持续疼痛明显增高(RR 2.27,可信区间1.40 ~ 3.68)。结论:较高的基线灾难化与接受子宫内膜异位症治疗的妇女预后较差有关。在咨询和决策过程中,这一点很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Targeted Endometriosis Treatment On Patients with Central Sensitization: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.

Objective: Central sensitization (CSS), a condition where the central nervous system amplifies pain signals, may impact response to treatment of chronic pain conditions. The objective of this study is to determine if CSS affects outcomes after medical or surgical treatment for women with endometriosis via a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Emerging Sources Citation Index was conducted without language or date restrictions. The search strategy utilized MeSH and EMTREE terms to capture concepts related to central sensitization, endometriosis, and associated symptoms like dysmenorrhea. Interventions in the reviewed studies included medical treatment or surgery.

Methods of study selection: Studies reporting on endometriosis outcomes in women with and wihout CSS were included in the review. We excluded studies which primarily focused on non-endometriosis pelvic pain syndromes. A total of 1821 abstracts were identified, and 259 full texts were reviewed for eligibility. Five studies met inclusion criteria encompassing a total of 1271 patients. Data for meta-analysis was not available for one study and another study was excluded as it was the only one describing medical treatment. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess quality and risk of bias. Results were sythesized using random effect meta-anlayses to estimate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confience using the DerSimmonian and Laird methods.

Tabulation, integration, and results: The percentage of patients with CSS ranged from 28.3% to 80.2%. Patients with CSS have smaller changes in pain scores after endometriosis surgery (RR 0.79, confidence interval 0.73-0.86) and significantly higher persistent pain (RR 2.27, confidence interval 1.40-3.68).

Conclusion: Higher baseline catastrophization is associated with worse outcomes in women undergoing treatment for endometriosis. This is important to consider during counseling and decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信