{"title":"TACE联合Lenvatinib-PD-1与TACE单药治疗作为不可切除肝细胞癌肝切除术前转换治疗:回顾性倾向评分匹配研究","authors":"Caiyun Lu, Renming Liu, Yanyang Zhang, Junyang Luo, Cheng Luo, Zaibo Jiang, Mingsheng Huang, Chunhui Qiu, Junwei Chen","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S517855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 inhibitor (PD-1 inhibitor) is recommended for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), and it has increased the probability of successful conversion. Our aim was to compare the clinical benefits of TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor versus TACE monotherapy as conversion therapy for patients with uHCC who subsequently underwent liver resection (LR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 213 uHCC patients who underwent LR after receiving either TACE combined with Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (combination group, n=109) or TACE monotherapy (monotherapy group, n=104). Propensity score matching was employed to minimize baseline confounding variables between cohorts. Tumor response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed between treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 68 matched pairs of patients who underwent LR, only 1 patient developed small-for-size syndrome. The combination group demonstrated superior treatment responses compared with the monotherapy group, with a significantly higher objective response rate (92.65% vs 80.88%, <i>p=0.043</i>) and pathological complete response rate (36.76% vs 11.76%, <i>p<0.001</i>). Furthermore, histopathological analyses revealed a lower incidence of microvascular invasion in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group (14.71% vs 29.41%, <i>p=0.039</i>). Survival analyses demonstrated significantly improved DFS (median not reached vs 20.0 months, <i>p=0.002</i>) and OS (median not reached for both, <i>p=0.005</i>) in the combination group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression identified preoperative monotherapy as an independent adverse prognostic factor for both DFS (HR, 2.46) and OS (HR, 3.05). Although combination therapy showed superior therapeutic efficacy, it was linked to a significantly higher incidence of rash and hand-foot skin reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to TACE monotherapy, TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor as conversion therapy can improve long-term survival outcomes in patients with uHCC who undergo subsequent LR, with an acceptable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"1527-1540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TACE Combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 Versus TACE Monotherapy as Conversion Therapy Before Liver Resection in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matching Study.\",\"authors\":\"Caiyun Lu, Renming Liu, Yanyang Zhang, Junyang Luo, Cheng Luo, Zaibo Jiang, Mingsheng Huang, Chunhui Qiu, Junwei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JHC.S517855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 inhibitor (PD-1 inhibitor) is recommended for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), and it has increased the probability of successful conversion. Our aim was to compare the clinical benefits of TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor versus TACE monotherapy as conversion therapy for patients with uHCC who subsequently underwent liver resection (LR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 213 uHCC patients who underwent LR after receiving either TACE combined with Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (combination group, n=109) or TACE monotherapy (monotherapy group, n=104). Propensity score matching was employed to minimize baseline confounding variables between cohorts. Tumor response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed between treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 68 matched pairs of patients who underwent LR, only 1 patient developed small-for-size syndrome. The combination group demonstrated superior treatment responses compared with the monotherapy group, with a significantly higher objective response rate (92.65% vs 80.88%, <i>p=0.043</i>) and pathological complete response rate (36.76% vs 11.76%, <i>p<0.001</i>). Furthermore, histopathological analyses revealed a lower incidence of microvascular invasion in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group (14.71% vs 29.41%, <i>p=0.039</i>). Survival analyses demonstrated significantly improved DFS (median not reached vs 20.0 months, <i>p=0.002</i>) and OS (median not reached for both, <i>p=0.005</i>) in the combination group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression identified preoperative monotherapy as an independent adverse prognostic factor for both DFS (HR, 2.46) and OS (HR, 3.05). Although combination therapy showed superior therapeutic efficacy, it was linked to a significantly higher incidence of rash and hand-foot skin reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to TACE monotherapy, TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor as conversion therapy can improve long-term survival outcomes in patients with uHCC who undergo subsequent LR, with an acceptable safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1527-1540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301121/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S517855\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S517855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合Lenvatinib +程序性死亡-1抑制剂(PD-1抑制剂)被推荐用于不可切除的肝细胞癌(uHCC),并且它增加了成功转化的可能性。我们的目的是比较TACE联合Lenvatinib-PD-1抑制剂与TACE单药治疗作为转化疗法对随后行肝切除术(LR)的uHCC患者的临床益处。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入213例uHCC患者,这些患者在接受TACE联合Lenvatinib + PD-1抑制剂(联合组,n=109)或TACE单药治疗(单药治疗组,n=104)后发生LR。采用倾向评分匹配来最小化队列之间的基线混淆变量。在治疗组之间评估肿瘤反应、无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(ae)。结果:68对行LR的配对患者中,只有1例出现小尺寸综合征。联合治疗组的治疗效果优于单药治疗组,客观缓解率(92.65% vs 80.88%, p=0.043)和病理完全缓解率(36.76% vs 11.76%, p)均显著高于单药治疗组。此外,组织病理学分析显示,与单一治疗组相比,联合治疗组微血管侵犯发生率较低(14.71% vs 29.41%, p=0.039)。生存分析显示,联合组的DFS(未达到中位数vs 20.0个月,p=0.002)和OS(均未达到中位数,p=0.005)显著改善。多因素Cox比例风险回归发现术前单药治疗是影响DFS (HR, 2.46)和OS (HR, 3.05)的独立不良预后因素。虽然联合治疗显示出优越的治疗效果,但它与皮疹和手足皮肤反应的发生率显着升高有关。结论:与TACE单药治疗相比,TACE联合Lenvatinib-PD-1抑制剂作为转换疗法可以改善uHCC患者后续LR的长期生存结果,并且具有可接受的安全性。
TACE Combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 Versus TACE Monotherapy as Conversion Therapy Before Liver Resection in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matching Study.
Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 inhibitor (PD-1 inhibitor) is recommended for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), and it has increased the probability of successful conversion. Our aim was to compare the clinical benefits of TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor versus TACE monotherapy as conversion therapy for patients with uHCC who subsequently underwent liver resection (LR).
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 213 uHCC patients who underwent LR after receiving either TACE combined with Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (combination group, n=109) or TACE monotherapy (monotherapy group, n=104). Propensity score matching was employed to minimize baseline confounding variables between cohorts. Tumor response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed between treatment arms.
Results: Among 68 matched pairs of patients who underwent LR, only 1 patient developed small-for-size syndrome. The combination group demonstrated superior treatment responses compared with the monotherapy group, with a significantly higher objective response rate (92.65% vs 80.88%, p=0.043) and pathological complete response rate (36.76% vs 11.76%, p<0.001). Furthermore, histopathological analyses revealed a lower incidence of microvascular invasion in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group (14.71% vs 29.41%, p=0.039). Survival analyses demonstrated significantly improved DFS (median not reached vs 20.0 months, p=0.002) and OS (median not reached for both, p=0.005) in the combination group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression identified preoperative monotherapy as an independent adverse prognostic factor for both DFS (HR, 2.46) and OS (HR, 3.05). Although combination therapy showed superior therapeutic efficacy, it was linked to a significantly higher incidence of rash and hand-foot skin reactions.
Conclusion: Compared to TACE monotherapy, TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor as conversion therapy can improve long-term survival outcomes in patients with uHCC who undergo subsequent LR, with an acceptable safety profile.