口腔微生物组及其对呼气挥发性分析的影响——房间里的大象。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Lorenzo S Petralia, Anesu Chawaguta, Veronika Ruzsanyi, Chris A Mayhew, Daniel Sanders
{"title":"口腔微生物组及其对呼气挥发性分析的影响——房间里的大象。","authors":"Lorenzo S Petralia, Anesu Chawaguta, Veronika Ruzsanyi, Chris A Mayhew, Daniel Sanders","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/adf505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid transfer of volatiles from alveolar blood into the lungs and then out of the body in exhaled breath leads to the common and natural conclusion that these volatiles provide information on health and metabolic processes, with considerable potential as biomarkers for use in the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of diseases. Whilst these exhaled volatiles could well serve as biomarkers for human metabolic processes, thereby providing insights into the clinical and nutritional status of individuals, there exist various confounding factors that limit their easy application. A major confounding factor is the introduction of microbially produced oral volatiles into the exhaled breath, yet these volatiles are often ignored in discovery volatile research studies. Here, we provide a comparative cross-sectional study of selected volatiles commonly found in exhaled breath. Using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry, we monitored these selected volatiles in nasal and oral end-tidal exhaled breath samples from twenty-one volunteers. The signal intensities from untargeted volatile detection were analysed for variances using principal component analysis (PCA), revealing a clear separation correlated with the sampling method. Four compounds representing sampling method-independent (acetone, isoprene, methanol, and 2-pentanone) and four corresponding to sampling method-dependent (1-propanol, 2-propanol, ethanol, and acetoin) were identified and selected based on their high PCA loadings. These compounds are further analysed and discussed to illustrate the extent to which the oral microbiome can influence volatile concentrations in exhaled breath. An additional noteworthy finding of this study is that the nasally sampled selected exhaled volatiles are little influenced by the inhalation route (oral or nasal). The outcome from this study is clear, namely that in order to reduce the influence of the oral microbiome on untargeted discovery breath research studies, end-tidal exhaled nasal breath samples should be taken for endogenous volatile analysis, otherwise oral microbial volatiles could be falsely identified as biomarkers. This is particularly important given the continuous rise in the use of machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence to identify variations in volatilomes. The development and commercialisation of simple, user-friendly and comfortable end-tidal exhaled nasal sample collection devices are required for nasal sampling to become widely adopted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The oral microbiome and its effect on exhaled breath volatile analysis-the elephant in the room.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo S Petralia, Anesu Chawaguta, Veronika Ruzsanyi, Chris A Mayhew, Daniel Sanders\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1752-7163/adf505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rapid transfer of volatiles from alveolar blood into the lungs and then out of the body in exhaled breath leads to the common and natural conclusion that these volatiles provide information on health and metabolic processes, with considerable potential as biomarkers for use in the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of diseases. Whilst these exhaled volatiles could well serve as biomarkers for human metabolic processes, thereby providing insights into the clinical and nutritional status of individuals, there exist various confounding factors that limit their easy application. A major confounding factor is the introduction of microbially produced oral volatiles into the exhaled breath, yet these volatiles are often ignored in discovery volatile research studies. Here, we provide a comparative cross-sectional study of selected volatiles commonly found in exhaled breath. Using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry, we monitored these selected volatiles in nasal and oral end-tidal exhaled breath samples from twenty-one volunteers. The signal intensities from untargeted volatile detection were analysed for variances using principal component analysis (PCA), revealing a clear separation correlated with the sampling method. Four compounds representing sampling method-independent (acetone, isoprene, methanol, and 2-pentanone) and four corresponding to sampling method-dependent (1-propanol, 2-propanol, ethanol, and acetoin) were identified and selected based on their high PCA loadings. These compounds are further analysed and discussed to illustrate the extent to which the oral microbiome can influence volatile concentrations in exhaled breath. An additional noteworthy finding of this study is that the nasally sampled selected exhaled volatiles are little influenced by the inhalation route (oral or nasal). The outcome from this study is clear, namely that in order to reduce the influence of the oral microbiome on untargeted discovery breath research studies, end-tidal exhaled nasal breath samples should be taken for endogenous volatile analysis, otherwise oral microbial volatiles could be falsely identified as biomarkers. This is particularly important given the continuous rise in the use of machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence to identify variations in volatilomes. The development and commercialisation of simple, user-friendly and comfortable end-tidal exhaled nasal sample collection devices are required for nasal sampling to become widely adopted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of breath research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of breath research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/adf505\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/adf505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

挥发性物质从肺泡血液迅速转移到肺部,然后通过呼出的气体排出体外,由此得出一个普遍而自然的结论,即这些挥发性物质提供了有关健康和代谢过程的信息,作为筛查、诊断和监测疾病的生物标志物具有相当大的潜力。虽然这些呼出的挥发物可以很好地作为人类代谢过程的生物标志物,从而提供对个体临床和营养状况的见解,但存在各种混杂因素,限制了它们的易于应用。一个主要的混淆因素是将微生物产生的口服挥发物引入呼出的气体中,然而这些挥发物在发现挥发物的研究中经常被忽略。本研究采用气相色谱离子迁移率光谱分析技术,对21名志愿者的鼻、口潮末呼气样本中常见的1-丙醇、2-丙醇、乙醇、乙酮、丙酮、异戊二烯、甲醇和2-戊酮等挥发物进行了对比分析。1-丙醇、2-丙醇、乙醇和乙托因浓度在经口呼出的样本和经鼻呼出的样本之间存在显著差异,这有助于说明口腔微生物组可以在多大程度上影响呼吸中的挥发性浓度。一个中心发现是,鼻腔取样挥发物受吸入途径(口服或鼻腔)的影响很小。有证据表明,为了减少口腔微生物组对非靶向发现呼吸研究的影响,应采集潮末呼出鼻腔呼吸样本进行内源性挥发性分析,否则口腔微生物挥发性物质可能被错误地识别为生物标志物。考虑到越来越多地使用机器学习算法和人工智能来识别挥发物的变化,这一点尤为重要。为了使鼻取样得到广泛采用,需要开发简单、方便和舒适的末潮呼气鼻取样装置并将其商业化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The oral microbiome and its effect on exhaled breath volatile analysis-the elephant in the room.

The rapid transfer of volatiles from alveolar blood into the lungs and then out of the body in exhaled breath leads to the common and natural conclusion that these volatiles provide information on health and metabolic processes, with considerable potential as biomarkers for use in the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of diseases. Whilst these exhaled volatiles could well serve as biomarkers for human metabolic processes, thereby providing insights into the clinical and nutritional status of individuals, there exist various confounding factors that limit their easy application. A major confounding factor is the introduction of microbially produced oral volatiles into the exhaled breath, yet these volatiles are often ignored in discovery volatile research studies. Here, we provide a comparative cross-sectional study of selected volatiles commonly found in exhaled breath. Using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry, we monitored these selected volatiles in nasal and oral end-tidal exhaled breath samples from twenty-one volunteers. The signal intensities from untargeted volatile detection were analysed for variances using principal component analysis (PCA), revealing a clear separation correlated with the sampling method. Four compounds representing sampling method-independent (acetone, isoprene, methanol, and 2-pentanone) and four corresponding to sampling method-dependent (1-propanol, 2-propanol, ethanol, and acetoin) were identified and selected based on their high PCA loadings. These compounds are further analysed and discussed to illustrate the extent to which the oral microbiome can influence volatile concentrations in exhaled breath. An additional noteworthy finding of this study is that the nasally sampled selected exhaled volatiles are little influenced by the inhalation route (oral or nasal). The outcome from this study is clear, namely that in order to reduce the influence of the oral microbiome on untargeted discovery breath research studies, end-tidal exhaled nasal breath samples should be taken for endogenous volatile analysis, otherwise oral microbial volatiles could be falsely identified as biomarkers. This is particularly important given the continuous rise in the use of machine learning algorithms and artificial intelligence to identify variations in volatilomes. The development and commercialisation of simple, user-friendly and comfortable end-tidal exhaled nasal sample collection devices are required for nasal sampling to become widely adopted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of breath research
Journal of breath research BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
21.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics. Typical areas of interest include: Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research. Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments. Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway. Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies. Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications. Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信