{"title":"国家健康和护理卓越研究所在技术评估期间确定的递送细胞和基因疗法的限制。","authors":"Harshini Hariram, Sean P Gavan","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325100391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the extent to which delivery constraints were considered during the health technology assessment (HTA) of cell and gene therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies were identified from guidance documents by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal and Highly Specialised Technologies streams until October 2024. Inductive coding was performed to identify delivery constraints reported within the guidance documents. A quantitative analysis established the proportion of guidance documents that reported delivery constraints, and the distribution of these constraints across the guidance documents (frequency, mean range).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen guidance documents for cell and gene therapies were identified. Thirteen guidance documents (81.3 percent of the sample) reported constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies. Thirty-one examples of delivery constraints were reported. The mean number of constraints per guidance document was 1.9 (range: 0-6 constraints). The reported constraints were grouped by six different themes: provider experience (<i>n</i> = 8); testing constraints (<i>n</i> = 7); geographical constraints (<i>n</i> = 5); payment constraints (<i>n</i> = 5); maturity of developments in care (<i>n</i> = 4); and infrastructure constraints (<i>n</i> = 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Formal HTA processes are one effective way to identify constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies. Proactive identification of potential delivery constraints will help decision-makers, providers, and manufacturers generate strategies that improve the implementation of cell and gene therapies. Overcoming delivery constraints will strengthen the likelihood of realizing the expected incremental net health benefit of cost-effective cell and gene therapies for patients across a healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies identified during technology appraisal by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.\",\"authors\":\"Harshini Hariram, Sean P Gavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462325100391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the extent to which delivery constraints were considered during the health technology assessment (HTA) of cell and gene therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies were identified from guidance documents by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal and Highly Specialised Technologies streams until October 2024. Inductive coding was performed to identify delivery constraints reported within the guidance documents. A quantitative analysis established the proportion of guidance documents that reported delivery constraints, and the distribution of these constraints across the guidance documents (frequency, mean range).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen guidance documents for cell and gene therapies were identified. Thirteen guidance documents (81.3 percent of the sample) reported constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies. Thirty-one examples of delivery constraints were reported. The mean number of constraints per guidance document was 1.9 (range: 0-6 constraints). The reported constraints were grouped by six different themes: provider experience (<i>n</i> = 8); testing constraints (<i>n</i> = 7); geographical constraints (<i>n</i> = 5); payment constraints (<i>n</i> = 5); maturity of developments in care (<i>n</i> = 4); and infrastructure constraints (<i>n</i> = 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Formal HTA processes are one effective way to identify constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies. Proactive identification of potential delivery constraints will help decision-makers, providers, and manufacturers generate strategies that improve the implementation of cell and gene therapies. Overcoming delivery constraints will strengthen the likelihood of realizing the expected incremental net health benefit of cost-effective cell and gene therapies for patients across a healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100391\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies identified during technology appraisal by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Objectives: Evaluate the extent to which delivery constraints were considered during the health technology assessment (HTA) of cell and gene therapies.
Methods: Constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies were identified from guidance documents by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal and Highly Specialised Technologies streams until October 2024. Inductive coding was performed to identify delivery constraints reported within the guidance documents. A quantitative analysis established the proportion of guidance documents that reported delivery constraints, and the distribution of these constraints across the guidance documents (frequency, mean range).
Results: Sixteen guidance documents for cell and gene therapies were identified. Thirteen guidance documents (81.3 percent of the sample) reported constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies. Thirty-one examples of delivery constraints were reported. The mean number of constraints per guidance document was 1.9 (range: 0-6 constraints). The reported constraints were grouped by six different themes: provider experience (n = 8); testing constraints (n = 7); geographical constraints (n = 5); payment constraints (n = 5); maturity of developments in care (n = 4); and infrastructure constraints (n = 2).
Conclusion: Formal HTA processes are one effective way to identify constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies. Proactive identification of potential delivery constraints will help decision-makers, providers, and manufacturers generate strategies that improve the implementation of cell and gene therapies. Overcoming delivery constraints will strengthen the likelihood of realizing the expected incremental net health benefit of cost-effective cell and gene therapies for patients across a healthcare system.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.