格陵兰哮喘-哮喘症状评分的发展和评价。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Christiane Hempel Christiansen, Michael Lynge Pedersen, Eva Cecilie Bonefeld-Jørgensen, Maja Hykkelbjerg Nielsen
{"title":"格陵兰哮喘-哮喘症状评分的发展和评价。","authors":"Christiane Hempel Christiansen, Michael Lynge Pedersen, Eva Cecilie Bonefeld-Jørgensen, Maja Hykkelbjerg Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/22423982.2025.2540684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study describes the development of the Asthma Symptom Score (ASS) and evaluates its accuracy and internal consistency in Greenlandic and Danish, using clinical interviews based on Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines as the gold standard. A cross-sectional study was conducted across all regions of Greenland, targeting citizens aged 12+, using data from the electronic medical record. The ASS (<i>n</i> = 94) was validated against clinical interviews using a receiver operating characteristic curve, yielding an area under the curve estimate of 0.91, indicating strong agreement. The ASS demonstrated a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 93%, and an overall agreement of 87%. Patients scoring 0-5 points were categorised as having controlled asthma, while those scoring 6-20 points were categorised as non-controlled. Among participants completing both the ASS and the clinical interview, 57% were classified as having non-controlled asthma. The ASS demonstrated acceptable internal consistency in both Greenlandic and Danish. These findings underscore the need for improved management of asthma in Greenland. The strong correlation between the ASS and clinical interviews suggests that the ASS may be a valuable tool in clinical practice for assessing asthma control among patients with a confirmed diagnosis. However, further validation including a larger study group, and test - retest reliability is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":13930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Circumpolar Health","volume":"84 1","pages":"2540684"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asthma in Greenland - development and evaluation of the asthma symptom score.\",\"authors\":\"Christiane Hempel Christiansen, Michael Lynge Pedersen, Eva Cecilie Bonefeld-Jørgensen, Maja Hykkelbjerg Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22423982.2025.2540684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study describes the development of the Asthma Symptom Score (ASS) and evaluates its accuracy and internal consistency in Greenlandic and Danish, using clinical interviews based on Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines as the gold standard. A cross-sectional study was conducted across all regions of Greenland, targeting citizens aged 12+, using data from the electronic medical record. The ASS (<i>n</i> = 94) was validated against clinical interviews using a receiver operating characteristic curve, yielding an area under the curve estimate of 0.91, indicating strong agreement. The ASS demonstrated a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 93%, and an overall agreement of 87%. Patients scoring 0-5 points were categorised as having controlled asthma, while those scoring 6-20 points were categorised as non-controlled. Among participants completing both the ASS and the clinical interview, 57% were classified as having non-controlled asthma. The ASS demonstrated acceptable internal consistency in both Greenlandic and Danish. These findings underscore the need for improved management of asthma in Greenland. The strong correlation between the ASS and clinical interviews suggests that the ASS may be a valuable tool in clinical practice for assessing asthma control among patients with a confirmed diagnosis. However, further validation including a larger study group, and test - retest reliability is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Circumpolar Health\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"2540684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305869/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Circumpolar Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2025.2540684\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Circumpolar Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2025.2540684","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究描述了哮喘症状评分(ASS)的发展,并使用基于全球哮喘倡议指南的临床访谈作为金标准,评估了其在格陵兰和丹麦的准确性和内部一致性。在格陵兰所有地区进行了一项横断面研究,目标是12岁以上的公民,使用电子医疗记录的数据。采用受试者工作特征曲线对临床访谈进行验证(n = 94),得出曲线下估计面积为0.91,表明高度一致。该方法的敏感性为83%,特异性为93%,总体一致性为87%。0 ~ 5分为哮喘控制,6 ~ 20分为哮喘不控制。在完成ASS和临床访谈的参与者中,57%被归类为非控制哮喘。该系统在格陵兰语和丹麦语中表现出可接受的内部一致性。这些发现强调了改善格陵兰哮喘管理的必要性。ASS与临床访谈之间的强相关性表明,ASS可能是临床实践中评估确诊患者哮喘控制的有价值的工具。然而,进一步的验证,包括更大的研究组,和测试-重测信度是推荐的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Asthma in Greenland - development and evaluation of the asthma symptom score.

Asthma in Greenland - development and evaluation of the asthma symptom score.

Asthma in Greenland - development and evaluation of the asthma symptom score.

Asthma in Greenland - development and evaluation of the asthma symptom score.

This study describes the development of the Asthma Symptom Score (ASS) and evaluates its accuracy and internal consistency in Greenlandic and Danish, using clinical interviews based on Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines as the gold standard. A cross-sectional study was conducted across all regions of Greenland, targeting citizens aged 12+, using data from the electronic medical record. The ASS (n = 94) was validated against clinical interviews using a receiver operating characteristic curve, yielding an area under the curve estimate of 0.91, indicating strong agreement. The ASS demonstrated a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 93%, and an overall agreement of 87%. Patients scoring 0-5 points were categorised as having controlled asthma, while those scoring 6-20 points were categorised as non-controlled. Among participants completing both the ASS and the clinical interview, 57% were classified as having non-controlled asthma. The ASS demonstrated acceptable internal consistency in both Greenlandic and Danish. These findings underscore the need for improved management of asthma in Greenland. The strong correlation between the ASS and clinical interviews suggests that the ASS may be a valuable tool in clinical practice for assessing asthma control among patients with a confirmed diagnosis. However, further validation including a larger study group, and test - retest reliability is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Circumpolar Health
International Journal of Circumpolar Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Circumpolar Health is published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Circumpolar Health Research Network [CircHNet]. The journal follows the tradition initiated by its predecessor, Arctic Medical Research. The journal specializes in circumpolar health. It provides a forum for many disciplines, including the biomedical sciences, social sciences, and humanities as they relate to human health in high latitude environments. The journal has a particular interest in the health of indigenous peoples. It is a vehicle for dissemination and exchange of knowledge among researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and those they serve. International Journal of Circumpolar Health welcomes Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications, Book Reviews, Dissertation Summaries, History and Biography, Clinical Case Reports, Public Health Practice, Conference and Workshop Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信