积极应对策略在大学生学业压力源与应激反应关系中的中介作用。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Cristina Ruiz-Camacho, Margarita Gozalo, Inmaculada Sánchez Casado
{"title":"积极应对策略在大学生学业压力源与应激反应关系中的中介作用。","authors":"Cristina Ruiz-Camacho, Margarita Gozalo, Inmaculada Sánchez Casado","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13141674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Academic stress is a major factor affecting university students' psychological well-being and overall functioning. This study examined whether three active coping strategies-positive reappraisal, social support seeking, and strategic planning-mediate the relationship between academic stressors and self-reported stress responses. <b>Methods</b>: A quantitative, cross-sectional, non-experimental design was employed. The sample comprised 1014 students from the University of Extremadura (M<i><sub>age</sub></i> = 20.56, SD = 3.50). Three subscales of the Academic Stress Questionnaire (CEA) were administered: Academic Stressors (E-CEA), Stress Responses (R-CEA), and Coping Strategies (A-CEA). Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and a multiple mediation model using structural equation modeling (SEM) tested direct and indirect effects, controlling for gender, study year, and academic field. <b>Results</b>: (1) Academic stressors were inversely related to positive reappraisal (<i>β</i> = -0.34, <i>p</i> < 0.001), planning (<i>β</i> = -0.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and social support seeking (<i>β</i> = -0.09, <i>p</i> < 0.01). (2) All three coping strategies were significantly associated with fewer stress symptoms, with positive reappraisal showing the strongest effect (<i>β</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i> < 0.001), followed by social support seeking (<i>β</i> = -0.06, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and planning (<i>β</i> = -0.03, <i>p</i> < 0.05). (3) Stressors had a strong positive direct effect on stress responses (<i>β</i> = 0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.001). (4) Coping strategies partially mediated the stressor-symptom link (total indirect effect: <i>β</i> = 0.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI [0.08, 0.16]). <b>Conclusions</b>: Active coping partially buffers the negative effects of academic stressors on perceived distress. Findings underscore the importance of enhancing students' coping skills and implementing institutional policies that reduce structural stress and support psychological well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mediating Role of Active Coping Strategies in the Relationship Between Academic Stressors and Stress Responses Among University Students.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Ruiz-Camacho, Margarita Gozalo, Inmaculada Sánchez Casado\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13141674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Academic stress is a major factor affecting university students' psychological well-being and overall functioning. This study examined whether three active coping strategies-positive reappraisal, social support seeking, and strategic planning-mediate the relationship between academic stressors and self-reported stress responses. <b>Methods</b>: A quantitative, cross-sectional, non-experimental design was employed. The sample comprised 1014 students from the University of Extremadura (M<i><sub>age</sub></i> = 20.56, SD = 3.50). Three subscales of the Academic Stress Questionnaire (CEA) were administered: Academic Stressors (E-CEA), Stress Responses (R-CEA), and Coping Strategies (A-CEA). Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and a multiple mediation model using structural equation modeling (SEM) tested direct and indirect effects, controlling for gender, study year, and academic field. <b>Results</b>: (1) Academic stressors were inversely related to positive reappraisal (<i>β</i> = -0.34, <i>p</i> < 0.001), planning (<i>β</i> = -0.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and social support seeking (<i>β</i> = -0.09, <i>p</i> < 0.01). (2) All three coping strategies were significantly associated with fewer stress symptoms, with positive reappraisal showing the strongest effect (<i>β</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i> < 0.001), followed by social support seeking (<i>β</i> = -0.06, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and planning (<i>β</i> = -0.03, <i>p</i> < 0.05). (3) Stressors had a strong positive direct effect on stress responses (<i>β</i> = 0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.001). (4) Coping strategies partially mediated the stressor-symptom link (total indirect effect: <i>β</i> = 0.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI [0.08, 0.16]). <b>Conclusions</b>: Active coping partially buffers the negative effects of academic stressors on perceived distress. Findings underscore the importance of enhancing students' coping skills and implementing institutional policies that reduce structural stress and support psychological well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141674\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:学业压力是影响大学生心理健康和整体功能的主要因素。本研究考察了积极重评、寻求社会支持和策略规划三种积极应对策略是否在学业压力源与自我报告应激反应之间起中介作用。方法:采用定量、横断面、非实验设计。样本包括来自埃斯特雷马杜拉大学的1014名学生(Mage = 20.56, SD = 3.50)。采用学业压力问卷(CEA)的三个分量表:学业压力源(E-CEA)、应激反应(R-CEA)和应对策略(A-CEA)。描述性统计、相关分析和使用结构方程模型(SEM)的多重中介模型检验了直接和间接影响,控制了性别、学习年份和学术领域。结果:(1)学业压力源与正向重评价(β = -0.34, p < 0.001)、计划(β = -0.12, p < 0.001)、社会支持寻求(β = -0.09, p < 0.01)呈负相关。(2)三种应对策略均与减轻压力症状有显著相关,其中积极重评的影响最大(β = -0.13, p < 0.001),其次是寻求社会支持(β = -0.06, p < 0.05)和计划(β = -0.03, p < 0.05)。(3)应激源对应激反应有较强的正向直接影响(β = 0.54, p < 0.001)。(4)应对策略部分介导应激因子-症状关联(总间接效应:β = 0.12, p < 0.001, 95% CI[0.08, 0.16])。结论:积极应对在一定程度上缓冲了学业压力源对感知苦恼的负面影响。研究结果强调了提高学生应对技能和实施制度性政策以减少结构性压力和支持心理健康的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Mediating Role of Active Coping Strategies in the Relationship Between Academic Stressors and Stress Responses Among University Students.

Background/Objectives: Academic stress is a major factor affecting university students' psychological well-being and overall functioning. This study examined whether three active coping strategies-positive reappraisal, social support seeking, and strategic planning-mediate the relationship between academic stressors and self-reported stress responses. Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional, non-experimental design was employed. The sample comprised 1014 students from the University of Extremadura (Mage = 20.56, SD = 3.50). Three subscales of the Academic Stress Questionnaire (CEA) were administered: Academic Stressors (E-CEA), Stress Responses (R-CEA), and Coping Strategies (A-CEA). Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and a multiple mediation model using structural equation modeling (SEM) tested direct and indirect effects, controlling for gender, study year, and academic field. Results: (1) Academic stressors were inversely related to positive reappraisal (β = -0.34, p < 0.001), planning (β = -0.12, p < 0.001), and social support seeking (β = -0.09, p < 0.01). (2) All three coping strategies were significantly associated with fewer stress symptoms, with positive reappraisal showing the strongest effect (β = -0.13, p < 0.001), followed by social support seeking (β = -0.06, p < 0.05) and planning (β = -0.03, p < 0.05). (3) Stressors had a strong positive direct effect on stress responses (β = 0.54, p < 0.001). (4) Coping strategies partially mediated the stressor-symptom link (total indirect effect: β = 0.12, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.08, 0.16]). Conclusions: Active coping partially buffers the negative effects of academic stressors on perceived distress. Findings underscore the importance of enhancing students' coping skills and implementing institutional policies that reduce structural stress and support psychological well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信