美国成年疼痛患者的疼痛强度和健康服务利用:一个横断面数据库分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David R Axon, Blair Jensen, Jordanne Koulong Kuemene, Mason Leech, Estabraq Mahmood
{"title":"美国成年疼痛患者的疼痛强度和健康服务利用:一个横断面数据库分析。","authors":"David R Axon, Blair Jensen, Jordanne Koulong Kuemene, Mason Leech, Estabraq Mahmood","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13141678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is a common, often debilitating ailment that may necessitate considerable health service utilization. However, there is a need to assess the associations of pain intensity and other variables with health service utilization among United States adults who have pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional database analysis made use of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey full-year consolidated data file and included United States adults (≥18 years) who have pain. The dependent variables consisted of four health service utilization variables, which included the number of emergency room visits, inpatient discharges, office visits, and outpatient visits in 2021. The number of visits or discharges were categorized as either ≥1 or 0. The independent variable was pain intensity (extreme, quite a bit, moderate, or little pain). Other variables analyzed included age, race, ethnicity, sex, marriage, education, employment, income, insurance, chronic conditions, limitations, exercise, smoking, physical health, and mental health. Chi-squared tests compared differences between pain intensity groups, and multivariable logistic regression models assessed the associations of pain intensity and other variables with each of the four health service utilization variables. The analysis was weighted for national estimates. The significance (alpha) level was 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 6280 adults, representing 89,314,769 United States adults with pain. In the multivariable analyses, there were statistically significant associations for extreme pain (odds ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.27-2.33), quite a bit of pain (odds ratio = 1.75, 95% confidence interval=1.37-2.24), and moderate pain (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.60) versus little pain with emergency room visits, extreme pain (odds ratio = 2.10, 95% confidence interval = 1.44-3.08) and quite a bit of pain (odds ratio = 1.66, 95% confidence interval = 1.21-2.28) versus little pain with inpatient discharges, and quite a bit of pain (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-2.11) versus little pain with office visits. There was no correlation between pain intensity levels and outpatient visits. In addition, several other variables were associated with various health service utilization variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This database analysis discovered greater pain intensity levels were often correlated with increased health service utilization, including more emergency room, inpatient, and office visits. These findings may inform the development of targeted interventions for people with specific characteristics. Further work is needed to implement initiatives that optimize health service utilization and ultimately improve health outcomes for United States adults who have pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Intensity and Health Service Utilization in United States Adults with Pain: A Cross-Sectional Database Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"David R Axon, Blair Jensen, Jordanne Koulong Kuemene, Mason Leech, Estabraq Mahmood\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13141678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is a common, often debilitating ailment that may necessitate considerable health service utilization. However, there is a need to assess the associations of pain intensity and other variables with health service utilization among United States adults who have pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional database analysis made use of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey full-year consolidated data file and included United States adults (≥18 years) who have pain. The dependent variables consisted of four health service utilization variables, which included the number of emergency room visits, inpatient discharges, office visits, and outpatient visits in 2021. The number of visits or discharges were categorized as either ≥1 or 0. The independent variable was pain intensity (extreme, quite a bit, moderate, or little pain). Other variables analyzed included age, race, ethnicity, sex, marriage, education, employment, income, insurance, chronic conditions, limitations, exercise, smoking, physical health, and mental health. Chi-squared tests compared differences between pain intensity groups, and multivariable logistic regression models assessed the associations of pain intensity and other variables with each of the four health service utilization variables. The analysis was weighted for national estimates. The significance (alpha) level was 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 6280 adults, representing 89,314,769 United States adults with pain. In the multivariable analyses, there were statistically significant associations for extreme pain (odds ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.27-2.33), quite a bit of pain (odds ratio = 1.75, 95% confidence interval=1.37-2.24), and moderate pain (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.60) versus little pain with emergency room visits, extreme pain (odds ratio = 2.10, 95% confidence interval = 1.44-3.08) and quite a bit of pain (odds ratio = 1.66, 95% confidence interval = 1.21-2.28) versus little pain with inpatient discharges, and quite a bit of pain (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-2.11) versus little pain with office visits. There was no correlation between pain intensity levels and outpatient visits. In addition, several other variables were associated with various health service utilization variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This database analysis discovered greater pain intensity levels were often correlated with increased health service utilization, including more emergency room, inpatient, and office visits. These findings may inform the development of targeted interventions for people with specific characteristics. Further work is needed to implement initiatives that optimize health service utilization and ultimately improve health outcomes for United States adults who have pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141678\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛是一种常见的,经常使人衰弱的疾病,可能需要大量的卫生服务利用。然而,有必要评估疼痛强度和其他变量与美国成年疼痛患者健康服务利用的关系。方法:本横断面数据库分析使用医疗支出小组调查全年合并数据文件,包括有疼痛的美国成年人(≥18岁)。因变量包括四个卫生服务利用变量,包括2021年急诊室就诊次数、住院出院次数、办公室就诊次数和门诊就诊次数。就诊或出院次数分为≥1或0。自变量是疼痛强度(极度疼痛、相当疼痛、中度疼痛或轻微疼痛)。分析的其他变量包括年龄、种族、民族、性别、婚姻、教育、就业、收入、保险、慢性病、限制、运动、吸烟、身体健康和心理健康。卡方检验比较了疼痛强度组之间的差异,多变量逻辑回归模型评估了疼痛强度和其他变量与四个卫生服务利用变量中的每一个的关联。该分析是根据国家估计进行加权的。显著性(α)水平为0.05。结果:该分析包括6280名成年人,代表89,314,769名患有疼痛的美国成年人。在多变量分析中,极度疼痛(优势比= 1.72,95%可信区间= 1.27-2.33)、极度疼痛(优势比= 1.75,95%可信区间=1.37-2.24)和中度疼痛(优势比= 1.28,95%可信区间= 1.02-1.60)与轻度疼痛、极度疼痛(优势比= 2.10,95%可信区间= 1.44-3.08)和极度疼痛(优势比= 1.66,95%可信区间= 1.21-2.28)与住院患者出院时疼痛轻微相比,与就诊时疼痛轻微相比,疼痛程度相当(优势比= 1.47,95%可信区间= 1.03-2.11)。疼痛强度和门诊次数之间没有相关性。此外,其他几个变量与各种保健服务利用变量有关。结论:该数据库分析发现,更大的疼痛强度水平通常与更高的医疗服务利用率相关,包括更多的急诊室、住院和办公室就诊。这些发现可能为有特定特征的人提供有针对性的干预措施。需要进一步开展工作来实施优化卫生服务利用的举措,并最终改善患有疼痛的美国成年人的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain Intensity and Health Service Utilization in United States Adults with Pain: A Cross-Sectional Database Analysis.

Background: Pain is a common, often debilitating ailment that may necessitate considerable health service utilization. However, there is a need to assess the associations of pain intensity and other variables with health service utilization among United States adults who have pain.

Methods: This cross-sectional database analysis made use of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey full-year consolidated data file and included United States adults (≥18 years) who have pain. The dependent variables consisted of four health service utilization variables, which included the number of emergency room visits, inpatient discharges, office visits, and outpatient visits in 2021. The number of visits or discharges were categorized as either ≥1 or 0. The independent variable was pain intensity (extreme, quite a bit, moderate, or little pain). Other variables analyzed included age, race, ethnicity, sex, marriage, education, employment, income, insurance, chronic conditions, limitations, exercise, smoking, physical health, and mental health. Chi-squared tests compared differences between pain intensity groups, and multivariable logistic regression models assessed the associations of pain intensity and other variables with each of the four health service utilization variables. The analysis was weighted for national estimates. The significance (alpha) level was 0.05.

Results: This analysis included 6280 adults, representing 89,314,769 United States adults with pain. In the multivariable analyses, there were statistically significant associations for extreme pain (odds ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.27-2.33), quite a bit of pain (odds ratio = 1.75, 95% confidence interval=1.37-2.24), and moderate pain (odds ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.60) versus little pain with emergency room visits, extreme pain (odds ratio = 2.10, 95% confidence interval = 1.44-3.08) and quite a bit of pain (odds ratio = 1.66, 95% confidence interval = 1.21-2.28) versus little pain with inpatient discharges, and quite a bit of pain (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-2.11) versus little pain with office visits. There was no correlation between pain intensity levels and outpatient visits. In addition, several other variables were associated with various health service utilization variables.

Conclusions: This database analysis discovered greater pain intensity levels were often correlated with increased health service utilization, including more emergency room, inpatient, and office visits. These findings may inform the development of targeted interventions for people with specific characteristics. Further work is needed to implement initiatives that optimize health service utilization and ultimately improve health outcomes for United States adults who have pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信