{"title":"意大利精神卫生保健工作者对胁迫的态度:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Calogero Gugliotta, Antonino Amato, Giuliano Anastasi, Teresa Rea, Roberto Latina, Pasquale Iozzo, Stefano Bambi","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13141680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Coercive measures remain a common practice in mental health, despite ethical concerns, potential risks, and uncertain efficacy. Mental healthcare workers' (MHCWs) attitudes toward coercion can influence their use. However, research in Italy is limited. This study aimed to investigate Italian MHCWs' attitudes toward coercion and their associations with sociodemographic and professional characteristics. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 356 MHCWs from a mental health department in Southern Italy. Participants completed the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS), which assesses negative, pragmatic, and positive attitudes toward coercion. Descriptive statistics (i.e., frequencies, percentages, means) and bivariate analyses (i.e., one-way ANOVA) were used to explore the associations between variables. <b>Results</b>: The majority of participants were male (56.7%), nurses (50.3%), and worked in acute psychiatric settings (52%), with a mean age of 51.08 years (±10.59) and 13.74 years (±12.14) of experience in mental health. Attitudes differed significantly according to age, sex, professional role, and work setting. More negative attitudes were found among staff in residential settings and non-caring roles (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Pragmatic attitudes were lower among older staff (<i>p</i> = 0.012) and among those in residential settings and non-caring roles (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Positive attitudes were higher among males (<i>p</i> = 0.001), nursing staff (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and staff in acute settings (<i>p</i> = 0.049). <b>Conclusions</b>: Italian MHCWs reported different attitudes toward coercion, which was influenced by personal and professional factors. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and policy strategies to promote attitudinal change, particularly in settings where positive attitudes are prevalent.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes Toward Coercion Among Mental Healthcare Workers in Italy: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Calogero Gugliotta, Antonino Amato, Giuliano Anastasi, Teresa Rea, Roberto Latina, Pasquale Iozzo, Stefano Bambi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/healthcare13141680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Coercive measures remain a common practice in mental health, despite ethical concerns, potential risks, and uncertain efficacy. Mental healthcare workers' (MHCWs) attitudes toward coercion can influence their use. However, research in Italy is limited. This study aimed to investigate Italian MHCWs' attitudes toward coercion and their associations with sociodemographic and professional characteristics. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 356 MHCWs from a mental health department in Southern Italy. Participants completed the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS), which assesses negative, pragmatic, and positive attitudes toward coercion. Descriptive statistics (i.e., frequencies, percentages, means) and bivariate analyses (i.e., one-way ANOVA) were used to explore the associations between variables. <b>Results</b>: The majority of participants were male (56.7%), nurses (50.3%), and worked in acute psychiatric settings (52%), with a mean age of 51.08 years (±10.59) and 13.74 years (±12.14) of experience in mental health. Attitudes differed significantly according to age, sex, professional role, and work setting. More negative attitudes were found among staff in residential settings and non-caring roles (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Pragmatic attitudes were lower among older staff (<i>p</i> = 0.012) and among those in residential settings and non-caring roles (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Positive attitudes were higher among males (<i>p</i> = 0.001), nursing staff (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and staff in acute settings (<i>p</i> = 0.049). <b>Conclusions</b>: Italian MHCWs reported different attitudes toward coercion, which was influenced by personal and professional factors. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and policy strategies to promote attitudinal change, particularly in settings where positive attitudes are prevalent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"13 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141680\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13141680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Attitudes Toward Coercion Among Mental Healthcare Workers in Italy: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Background/Objectives: Coercive measures remain a common practice in mental health, despite ethical concerns, potential risks, and uncertain efficacy. Mental healthcare workers' (MHCWs) attitudes toward coercion can influence their use. However, research in Italy is limited. This study aimed to investigate Italian MHCWs' attitudes toward coercion and their associations with sociodemographic and professional characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 356 MHCWs from a mental health department in Southern Italy. Participants completed the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS), which assesses negative, pragmatic, and positive attitudes toward coercion. Descriptive statistics (i.e., frequencies, percentages, means) and bivariate analyses (i.e., one-way ANOVA) were used to explore the associations between variables. Results: The majority of participants were male (56.7%), nurses (50.3%), and worked in acute psychiatric settings (52%), with a mean age of 51.08 years (±10.59) and 13.74 years (±12.14) of experience in mental health. Attitudes differed significantly according to age, sex, professional role, and work setting. More negative attitudes were found among staff in residential settings and non-caring roles (p < 0.001). Pragmatic attitudes were lower among older staff (p = 0.012) and among those in residential settings and non-caring roles (p < 0.001). Positive attitudes were higher among males (p = 0.001), nursing staff (p < 0.001), and staff in acute settings (p = 0.049). Conclusions: Italian MHCWs reported different attitudes toward coercion, which was influenced by personal and professional factors. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and policy strategies to promote attitudinal change, particularly in settings where positive attitudes are prevalent.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.