口腔健康不平等的政治决定因素:从六个案例研究中制定和实施政策的经验教训。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Stefan T. Serban, Sandra Perdomo, Aida Borges-Yañez, Finbarr Allen, Carol Guarnizo-Herreño, María Kamila Navarro-Ramírez, Matt Hobbs, Lois K. Cohen, Georgios Tsakos, Sarah R. Baker, David I. Conway
{"title":"口腔健康不平等的政治决定因素:从六个案例研究中制定和实施政策的经验教训。","authors":"Stefan T. Serban,&nbsp;Sandra Perdomo,&nbsp;Aida Borges-Yañez,&nbsp;Finbarr Allen,&nbsp;Carol Guarnizo-Herreño,&nbsp;María Kamila Navarro-Ramírez,&nbsp;Matt Hobbs,&nbsp;Lois K. Cohen,&nbsp;Georgios Tsakos,&nbsp;Sarah R. Baker,&nbsp;David I. Conway","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Oral diseases are the most prevalent diseases globally, affecting almost half of the world's population with a disproportionate burden on the most vulnerable groups. Despite growing attention on the social and commercial determinants of health, there is still a largely unexplored area in understanding the political determinants of health and oral health. The aim of this paper is to describe national policy development processes for policies impacting population oral health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multiple case study approach was used to analyse six case studies focused on national policy development processes targeting oral health. Kingdon's Multiple Streams Model was used to examine how problems, policy solutions, and political factors aligned to influence policymaking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Some of the most common barriers to policy adoption and implementation were misinformation strategies, legal challenges, industry lobbying, ideological opposition to state intervention, and lack of transparency regarding conflicts of interest. Important common facilitators included robust scientific evidence presented in an accessible manner to the appropriate audiences, identification of key decision-makers, support from parties from across the political spectrum, intersectoral collaboration, and ongoing policy monitoring and evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides novel insights into how political determinants influence social and commercial determinants of health, demonstrating how political contexts and power dynamics shape national public health policy development processes. Understanding these dynamics is essential for ensuring that evidence-based public health interventions are politically feasible and resilient to opposition from certain private industry and ideological interests. In a time of growing inequalities, neutrality in the face of structural injustice risks entrenching a status quo that favours those with the greatest influence. To address these problems sustainably, public health practitioners must recognise and engage with the political nature of policymaking.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":"53 5","pages":"514-532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cdoe.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Determinants of Oral Health Inequalities: Lessons in Policy Development and Implementation From Six Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"Stefan T. Serban,&nbsp;Sandra Perdomo,&nbsp;Aida Borges-Yañez,&nbsp;Finbarr Allen,&nbsp;Carol Guarnizo-Herreño,&nbsp;María Kamila Navarro-Ramírez,&nbsp;Matt Hobbs,&nbsp;Lois K. Cohen,&nbsp;Georgios Tsakos,&nbsp;Sarah R. Baker,&nbsp;David I. Conway\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cdoe.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Oral diseases are the most prevalent diseases globally, affecting almost half of the world's population with a disproportionate burden on the most vulnerable groups. Despite growing attention on the social and commercial determinants of health, there is still a largely unexplored area in understanding the political determinants of health and oral health. The aim of this paper is to describe national policy development processes for policies impacting population oral health.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multiple case study approach was used to analyse six case studies focused on national policy development processes targeting oral health. Kingdon's Multiple Streams Model was used to examine how problems, policy solutions, and political factors aligned to influence policymaking.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Some of the most common barriers to policy adoption and implementation were misinformation strategies, legal challenges, industry lobbying, ideological opposition to state intervention, and lack of transparency regarding conflicts of interest. Important common facilitators included robust scientific evidence presented in an accessible manner to the appropriate audiences, identification of key decision-makers, support from parties from across the political spectrum, intersectoral collaboration, and ongoing policy monitoring and evaluation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study provides novel insights into how political determinants influence social and commercial determinants of health, demonstrating how political contexts and power dynamics shape national public health policy development processes. Understanding these dynamics is essential for ensuring that evidence-based public health interventions are politically feasible and resilient to opposition from certain private industry and ideological interests. In a time of growing inequalities, neutrality in the face of structural injustice risks entrenching a status quo that favours those with the greatest influence. To address these problems sustainably, public health practitioners must recognise and engage with the political nature of policymaking.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"53 5\",\"pages\":\"514-532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cdoe.70005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdoe.70005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdoe.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:口腔疾病是全球最流行的疾病,影响到世界近一半的人口,对最脆弱群体造成了不成比例的负担。尽管人们越来越关注健康的社会和商业决定因素,但在了解健康和口腔健康的政治决定因素方面,仍有一个很大程度上未开发的领域。本文的目的是描述影响人口口腔健康的政策的国家政策制定过程。方法:采用多案例研究方法分析六个案例研究,重点是针对口腔健康的国家政策制定过程。金登的多流模型被用来研究问题、政策解决方案和政治因素是如何共同影响政策制定的。结果:政策采纳和实施的一些最常见障碍是误传策略、法律挑战、行业游说、对国家干预的意识形态反对以及利益冲突缺乏透明度。重要的共同促进因素包括以适当的方式向适当的受众提供有力的科学证据、确定关键决策者、来自各个政治领域的各方的支持、部门间合作以及持续的政策监测和评价。结论:这项研究为政治决定因素如何影响健康的社会和商业决定因素提供了新的见解,展示了政治背景和权力动态如何塑造国家公共卫生政策制定进程。了解这些动态对于确保以证据为基础的公共卫生干预措施在政治上是可行的,并且能够抵御某些私营企业和意识形态利益的反对至关重要。在不平等日益加剧的时代,面对结构性不公正保持中立可能会巩固有利于影响力最大的人的现状。为了可持续地解决这些问题,公共卫生从业人员必须认识到并参与决策的政治性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Political Determinants of Oral Health Inequalities: Lessons in Policy Development and Implementation From Six Case Studies

The Political Determinants of Oral Health Inequalities: Lessons in Policy Development and Implementation From Six Case Studies

Objectives

Oral diseases are the most prevalent diseases globally, affecting almost half of the world's population with a disproportionate burden on the most vulnerable groups. Despite growing attention on the social and commercial determinants of health, there is still a largely unexplored area in understanding the political determinants of health and oral health. The aim of this paper is to describe national policy development processes for policies impacting population oral health.

Methods

A multiple case study approach was used to analyse six case studies focused on national policy development processes targeting oral health. Kingdon's Multiple Streams Model was used to examine how problems, policy solutions, and political factors aligned to influence policymaking.

Results

Some of the most common barriers to policy adoption and implementation were misinformation strategies, legal challenges, industry lobbying, ideological opposition to state intervention, and lack of transparency regarding conflicts of interest. Important common facilitators included robust scientific evidence presented in an accessible manner to the appropriate audiences, identification of key decision-makers, support from parties from across the political spectrum, intersectoral collaboration, and ongoing policy monitoring and evaluation.

Conclusions

This study provides novel insights into how political determinants influence social and commercial determinants of health, demonstrating how political contexts and power dynamics shape national public health policy development processes. Understanding these dynamics is essential for ensuring that evidence-based public health interventions are politically feasible and resilient to opposition from certain private industry and ideological interests. In a time of growing inequalities, neutrality in the face of structural injustice risks entrenching a status quo that favours those with the greatest influence. To address these problems sustainably, public health practitioners must recognise and engage with the political nature of policymaking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信