Junho Song, Ryan Hoang, Timothy Hoang, Jennifer Yu, Justin Tiao, Alexander Yu, Avanish Yendluri, Auston R Locke, Niklas H Koehne, Nikan K Namiri, John J Corvi, Brian H Cho, Samuel K Cho, Saad Chaudhary, Andrew C Hecht
{"title":"“门诊”手术的不同定义可能影响腰椎融合相关的研究结果。","authors":"Junho Song, Ryan Hoang, Timothy Hoang, Jennifer Yu, Justin Tiao, Alexander Yu, Avanish Yendluri, Auston R Locke, Niklas H Koehne, Nikan K Namiri, John J Corvi, Brian H Cho, Samuel K Cho, Saad Chaudhary, Andrew C Hecht","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether different methods of defining \"outpatient\" surgery influence postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Lumbar spinal fusion is increasingly performed in outpatient settings due to advancements in techniques and patient selection. However, inconsistencies in the definition of \"outpatient\" surgery can complicate outcome comparisons with patients categorized as outpatient by the hospital may unexpectedly require inpatient admission postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ACS-NSQIP was queried for patients undergoing primary elective lumbar fusion from 2012 to 2022. Those with revision surgeries, infection, malignancy, and nonelective cases were excluded. Two definitions of \"outpatient\" surgery were evaluated: hospital-defined outpatient (HDO) and same-day discharge (SDD). Propensity score matching was used to compare HDO and SDD cohorts to their respective inpatient counterparts. Primary outcomes analyzed included 30-day readmission, reoperation, and postoperative complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare the risks of complications for HDO and SDD cohorts compared with their inpatient counterparts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 131,113 patients included, 9623 (7.3%) were HDO and 2019 (1.5%) were SDD. In propensity matched cohorts, inpatient lumbar fusion was associated with greater risk of 30-day readmission [odds ratio (OR) 1.148, P<0.001], reoperation (OR: 1.243, P<0.001), mortality (OR: 2.339, P<0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR: 1.790, P=0.002), urinary tract infection (OR: 1.359, P<0.001), and myocardial infarction (OR: 1.773, P=0.003). Compared with the propensity matched SDD cohort, inpatient lumbar fusion was significantly associated with greater rates of readmission (OR: 1.279, P=0.005), reoperation (OR: 1.429, P=0.006), and urinary tract infection (OR: 2.520, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discrepancies in outcomes between inpatient and outpatient lumbar fusion were more pronounced with the hospital-defined outpatient definition compared with in the same-day discharge cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differing Definitions of \\\"Outpatient\\\" Surgery Can Influence Study Outcomes Related to Lumbar Fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Junho Song, Ryan Hoang, Timothy Hoang, Jennifer Yu, Justin Tiao, Alexander Yu, Avanish Yendluri, Auston R Locke, Niklas H Koehne, Nikan K Namiri, John J Corvi, Brian H Cho, Samuel K Cho, Saad Chaudhary, Andrew C Hecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether different methods of defining \\\"outpatient\\\" surgery influence postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Lumbar spinal fusion is increasingly performed in outpatient settings due to advancements in techniques and patient selection. However, inconsistencies in the definition of \\\"outpatient\\\" surgery can complicate outcome comparisons with patients categorized as outpatient by the hospital may unexpectedly require inpatient admission postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ACS-NSQIP was queried for patients undergoing primary elective lumbar fusion from 2012 to 2022. Those with revision surgeries, infection, malignancy, and nonelective cases were excluded. Two definitions of \\\"outpatient\\\" surgery were evaluated: hospital-defined outpatient (HDO) and same-day discharge (SDD). Propensity score matching was used to compare HDO and SDD cohorts to their respective inpatient counterparts. Primary outcomes analyzed included 30-day readmission, reoperation, and postoperative complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare the risks of complications for HDO and SDD cohorts compared with their inpatient counterparts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 131,113 patients included, 9623 (7.3%) were HDO and 2019 (1.5%) were SDD. In propensity matched cohorts, inpatient lumbar fusion was associated with greater risk of 30-day readmission [odds ratio (OR) 1.148, P<0.001], reoperation (OR: 1.243, P<0.001), mortality (OR: 2.339, P<0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR: 1.790, P=0.002), urinary tract infection (OR: 1.359, P<0.001), and myocardial infarction (OR: 1.773, P=0.003). Compared with the propensity matched SDD cohort, inpatient lumbar fusion was significantly associated with greater rates of readmission (OR: 1.279, P=0.005), reoperation (OR: 1.429, P=0.006), and urinary tract infection (OR: 2.520, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discrepancies in outcomes between inpatient and outpatient lumbar fusion were more pronounced with the hospital-defined outpatient definition compared with in the same-day discharge cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001894\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differing Definitions of "Outpatient" Surgery Can Influence Study Outcomes Related to Lumbar Fusion.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To evaluate whether different methods of defining "outpatient" surgery influence postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion.
Summary of background data: Lumbar spinal fusion is increasingly performed in outpatient settings due to advancements in techniques and patient selection. However, inconsistencies in the definition of "outpatient" surgery can complicate outcome comparisons with patients categorized as outpatient by the hospital may unexpectedly require inpatient admission postoperatively.
Methods: ACS-NSQIP was queried for patients undergoing primary elective lumbar fusion from 2012 to 2022. Those with revision surgeries, infection, malignancy, and nonelective cases were excluded. Two definitions of "outpatient" surgery were evaluated: hospital-defined outpatient (HDO) and same-day discharge (SDD). Propensity score matching was used to compare HDO and SDD cohorts to their respective inpatient counterparts. Primary outcomes analyzed included 30-day readmission, reoperation, and postoperative complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare the risks of complications for HDO and SDD cohorts compared with their inpatient counterparts.
Results: Of the 131,113 patients included, 9623 (7.3%) were HDO and 2019 (1.5%) were SDD. In propensity matched cohorts, inpatient lumbar fusion was associated with greater risk of 30-day readmission [odds ratio (OR) 1.148, P<0.001], reoperation (OR: 1.243, P<0.001), mortality (OR: 2.339, P<0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR: 1.790, P=0.002), urinary tract infection (OR: 1.359, P<0.001), and myocardial infarction (OR: 1.773, P=0.003). Compared with the propensity matched SDD cohort, inpatient lumbar fusion was significantly associated with greater rates of readmission (OR: 1.279, P=0.005), reoperation (OR: 1.429, P=0.006), and urinary tract infection (OR: 2.520, P<0.001).
Conclusion: Discrepancies in outcomes between inpatient and outpatient lumbar fusion were more pronounced with the hospital-defined outpatient definition compared with in the same-day discharge cohort.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.