Gareth Walker, Supriya Balasubramanya, Joel Bowen, Nedal Debab, Robert Bethune, William Faux, Naomi Spencer, Venla Kantola, Mark Feeney, Sebastian Smolarek, Sarah E R Bailey, Willie Hamilton, Sally Ward-Booth, Timothy McDonald, Iain Bain, John Renninson, Nicholas A Kennedy, Mark Cartmell
{"title":"使用粪便免疫化学测试对COVID-19时代的结肠直肠紧急转诊进行分类:一项前瞻性英国真实世界多中心队列研究","authors":"Gareth Walker, Supriya Balasubramanya, Joel Bowen, Nedal Debab, Robert Bethune, William Faux, Naomi Spencer, Venla Kantola, Mark Feeney, Sebastian Smolarek, Sarah E R Bailey, Willie Hamilton, Sally Ward-Booth, Timothy McDonald, Iain Bain, John Renninson, Nicholas A Kennedy, Mark Cartmell","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During the early COVID-19 pandemic, UK guidelines advocated faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) with a threshold of 10 µg/g to help secondary care clinicians triage urgent suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) referrals. We aimed to evaluate the real-world performance and impact of FIT in a high-risk cohort referred against National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NG12 (2015) criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicentre prospective observational cohort study of FIT at all four secondary care hospitals in Devon (UK) between 1 April 2020 and 31 December 2020. FIT use was at the discretion of primary and secondary care clinicians. Incident CRC cases were identified ≥12 months after general practitioner (GP) referral using regional National Bowel Cancer Audit data linkage. We assessed diagnostic accuracy and healthcare utilisation in patients with and without FIT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 6698 patients were included: 55% female, median age 72 years (IQR 65-82). Just over half (53%, 3552) of patients underwent FIT with a positivity rate of 34% (n=1237). CRC prevalence in patients with no FIT, positive FIT and negative FIT was 6% (189), 11% (137) and 0.5% (11), respectively. The prevalence of all cancers, including non-CRCs, was similar among FIT and no-FIT cohorts (p=0.74). Sensitivity and specificity of FIT for CRC were 0.93 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.69), respectively. Patients with negative FIT underwent fewer lower gastrointestinal endoscopies (no FIT 62% (1964) vs positive FIT 69% (857) vs negative FIT 36% (835)), p=0.0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT is a useful triage tool for patients with suspected CRC which safely reduces endoscopy demand and prioritises those at greatest cancer risk. Standardised regional referral pathways, greater use of 'straight-to-test' investigations and GP support are needed to maximise its impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triaging colorectal urgent referrals in the COVID-19 era using faecal immunochemical testing: a prospective UK real-world multicentre cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Gareth Walker, Supriya Balasubramanya, Joel Bowen, Nedal Debab, Robert Bethune, William Faux, Naomi Spencer, Venla Kantola, Mark Feeney, Sebastian Smolarek, Sarah E R Bailey, Willie Hamilton, Sally Ward-Booth, Timothy McDonald, Iain Bain, John Renninson, Nicholas A Kennedy, Mark Cartmell\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During the early COVID-19 pandemic, UK guidelines advocated faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) with a threshold of 10 µg/g to help secondary care clinicians triage urgent suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) referrals. We aimed to evaluate the real-world performance and impact of FIT in a high-risk cohort referred against National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NG12 (2015) criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicentre prospective observational cohort study of FIT at all four secondary care hospitals in Devon (UK) between 1 April 2020 and 31 December 2020. FIT use was at the discretion of primary and secondary care clinicians. Incident CRC cases were identified ≥12 months after general practitioner (GP) referral using regional National Bowel Cancer Audit data linkage. We assessed diagnostic accuracy and healthcare utilisation in patients with and without FIT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 6698 patients were included: 55% female, median age 72 years (IQR 65-82). Just over half (53%, 3552) of patients underwent FIT with a positivity rate of 34% (n=1237). CRC prevalence in patients with no FIT, positive FIT and negative FIT was 6% (189), 11% (137) and 0.5% (11), respectively. The prevalence of all cancers, including non-CRCs, was similar among FIT and no-FIT cohorts (p=0.74). Sensitivity and specificity of FIT for CRC were 0.93 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.69), respectively. Patients with negative FIT underwent fewer lower gastrointestinal endoscopies (no FIT 62% (1964) vs positive FIT 69% (857) vs negative FIT 36% (835)), p=0.0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT is a useful triage tool for patients with suspected CRC which safely reduces endoscopy demand and prioritises those at greatest cancer risk. Standardised regional referral pathways, greater use of 'straight-to-test' investigations and GP support are needed to maximise its impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306339/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在COVID-19大流行早期,英国指南提倡阈值为10µg/g的粪便免疫化学测试(FIT),以帮助二级保健临床医生对紧急疑似结直肠癌(CRC)转诊进行分诊。我们的目的是根据国家健康与临床卓越研究所NG12(2015)标准评估FIT在高风险队列中的实际表现和影响。方法:2020年4月1日至2020年12月31日期间,在英国德文郡所有四家二级保健医院进行FIT多中心前瞻性观察队列研究。FIT的使用由初级和二级护理临床医生决定。使用区域国家肠癌审计数据链接,在全科医生(GP)转诊后≥12个月确定结直肠癌病例。我们评估了FIT患者和非FIT患者的诊断准确性和医疗保健利用率。结果:共纳入6698例患者:55%为女性,中位年龄72岁(IQR 65-82)。超过一半(53%,3552)的患者接受了FIT,阳性率为34% (n=1237)。无FIT、FIT阳性和FIT阴性患者的CRC患病率分别为6%(189)、11%(137)和0.5%(11)。所有癌症(包括非crc)的患病率在FIT组和非FIT组中相似(p=0.74)。FIT对CRC的敏感性和特异性分别为0.93 (95% CI 0.87 ~ 0.96)和0.68 (95% CI 0.66 ~ 0.69)。FIT阴性患者较少接受下消化道内窥镜检查(没有FIT的患者占62% (1964),FIT阳性患者占69% (857),FIT阴性患者占36% (835),p=0.0005)。结论:FIT对疑似结直肠癌患者是一种有用的分诊工具,可以安全减少内镜检查的需求,优先考虑那些癌症风险最高的患者。标准化的区域转诊途径,更多地使用“直接测试”调查和全科医生支持需要最大限度地发挥其影响。
Triaging colorectal urgent referrals in the COVID-19 era using faecal immunochemical testing: a prospective UK real-world multicentre cohort study.
Objective: During the early COVID-19 pandemic, UK guidelines advocated faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) with a threshold of 10 µg/g to help secondary care clinicians triage urgent suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) referrals. We aimed to evaluate the real-world performance and impact of FIT in a high-risk cohort referred against National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NG12 (2015) criteria.
Methods: Multicentre prospective observational cohort study of FIT at all four secondary care hospitals in Devon (UK) between 1 April 2020 and 31 December 2020. FIT use was at the discretion of primary and secondary care clinicians. Incident CRC cases were identified ≥12 months after general practitioner (GP) referral using regional National Bowel Cancer Audit data linkage. We assessed diagnostic accuracy and healthcare utilisation in patients with and without FIT.
Results: Overall, 6698 patients were included: 55% female, median age 72 years (IQR 65-82). Just over half (53%, 3552) of patients underwent FIT with a positivity rate of 34% (n=1237). CRC prevalence in patients with no FIT, positive FIT and negative FIT was 6% (189), 11% (137) and 0.5% (11), respectively. The prevalence of all cancers, including non-CRCs, was similar among FIT and no-FIT cohorts (p=0.74). Sensitivity and specificity of FIT for CRC were 0.93 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.69), respectively. Patients with negative FIT underwent fewer lower gastrointestinal endoscopies (no FIT 62% (1964) vs positive FIT 69% (857) vs negative FIT 36% (835)), p=0.0005).
Conclusions: FIT is a useful triage tool for patients with suspected CRC which safely reduces endoscopy demand and prioritises those at greatest cancer risk. Standardised regional referral pathways, greater use of 'straight-to-test' investigations and GP support are needed to maximise its impact.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.