Anita Mamtani, Varadan Sevilimedu, Andrea V Barrio, Monica Morrow
{"title":"在大多数cT1N0三阴性和HER2+乳腺癌的前期手术治疗中,腋窝清扫是可以避免的。","authors":"Anita Mamtani, Varadan Sevilimedu, Andrea V Barrio, Monica Morrow","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07785-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in cT1N0 patients with triple-negative (TN) or HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer has been controversial. It is unclear whether NAC or upfront surgery minimizes axillary dissection (ALND) risk in the contemporary cT1N0 TN/HER2+ patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive cT1N0 TN/HER2+ patients who received NAC or underwent upfront surgery at our institution between 01/2020-12/2022 were examined. ALND was indicated for any positive sentinel nodes (+SLNs) after NAC, ≥ 3 positive SLNs after upfront surgery, or 1-2 positive SLNs after upfront mastectomy not requiring radiotherapy (RT). Clinicopathologic features, nodal burden, and ALND rates were compared between NAC versus upfront surgery cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 506 patients, 43% (N = 218) were TN and 57% (N = 288) were HER2+; 9% (N = 47) received NAC before surgery; 68%( N = 343) underwent upfront breast-conserving surgery (BCS); 23% (N = 116) underwent upfront mastectomy. Axillary ultrasound was performed in 23% of patients who received NAC versus 26% of patients who underwent upfront BCS versus 33% of patients who underwent upfront mastectomy. ALND was performed in 6.4% (N = 3) of patients with any positive SLN after NAC, 1.7% (N = 6) who underwent upfront BCS, and 1.7% (N = 2) who underwent upfront mastectomy with ≥ 3 positive SLNs or 1-2 positive SLNs not meeting RT criteria (p = 0.13). No factors were associated with ALND, including T stage, upfront versus NAC approach, or tumor subtype.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nodal disease burden is low among cT1N0 TN/HER2+ patients even in the absence of routine axillary ultrasound. ALND was performed in < 2% of patients with cT1N0 TN/HER2+ disease who had upfront surgery, and adjuvant systemic therapy was de-escalated among many pathologically node-negative patients following surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"355-363"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Axillary dissection is avoidable in most cT1N0 triple-negative & HER2+ breast cancers treated with upfront surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Anita Mamtani, Varadan Sevilimedu, Andrea V Barrio, Monica Morrow\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-025-07785-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in cT1N0 patients with triple-negative (TN) or HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer has been controversial. It is unclear whether NAC or upfront surgery minimizes axillary dissection (ALND) risk in the contemporary cT1N0 TN/HER2+ patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive cT1N0 TN/HER2+ patients who received NAC or underwent upfront surgery at our institution between 01/2020-12/2022 were examined. ALND was indicated for any positive sentinel nodes (+SLNs) after NAC, ≥ 3 positive SLNs after upfront surgery, or 1-2 positive SLNs after upfront mastectomy not requiring radiotherapy (RT). Clinicopathologic features, nodal burden, and ALND rates were compared between NAC versus upfront surgery cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 506 patients, 43% (N = 218) were TN and 57% (N = 288) were HER2+; 9% (N = 47) received NAC before surgery; 68%( N = 343) underwent upfront breast-conserving surgery (BCS); 23% (N = 116) underwent upfront mastectomy. Axillary ultrasound was performed in 23% of patients who received NAC versus 26% of patients who underwent upfront BCS versus 33% of patients who underwent upfront mastectomy. ALND was performed in 6.4% (N = 3) of patients with any positive SLN after NAC, 1.7% (N = 6) who underwent upfront BCS, and 1.7% (N = 2) who underwent upfront mastectomy with ≥ 3 positive SLNs or 1-2 positive SLNs not meeting RT criteria (p = 0.13). No factors were associated with ALND, including T stage, upfront versus NAC approach, or tumor subtype.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nodal disease burden is low among cT1N0 TN/HER2+ patients even in the absence of routine axillary ultrasound. ALND was performed in < 2% of patients with cT1N0 TN/HER2+ disease who had upfront surgery, and adjuvant systemic therapy was de-escalated among many pathologically node-negative patients following surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"355-363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07785-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07785-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Axillary dissection is avoidable in most cT1N0 triple-negative & HER2+ breast cancers treated with upfront surgery.
Purpose: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in cT1N0 patients with triple-negative (TN) or HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer has been controversial. It is unclear whether NAC or upfront surgery minimizes axillary dissection (ALND) risk in the contemporary cT1N0 TN/HER2+ patient population.
Methods: Consecutive cT1N0 TN/HER2+ patients who received NAC or underwent upfront surgery at our institution between 01/2020-12/2022 were examined. ALND was indicated for any positive sentinel nodes (+SLNs) after NAC, ≥ 3 positive SLNs after upfront surgery, or 1-2 positive SLNs after upfront mastectomy not requiring radiotherapy (RT). Clinicopathologic features, nodal burden, and ALND rates were compared between NAC versus upfront surgery cohorts.
Results: Among 506 patients, 43% (N = 218) were TN and 57% (N = 288) were HER2+; 9% (N = 47) received NAC before surgery; 68%( N = 343) underwent upfront breast-conserving surgery (BCS); 23% (N = 116) underwent upfront mastectomy. Axillary ultrasound was performed in 23% of patients who received NAC versus 26% of patients who underwent upfront BCS versus 33% of patients who underwent upfront mastectomy. ALND was performed in 6.4% (N = 3) of patients with any positive SLN after NAC, 1.7% (N = 6) who underwent upfront BCS, and 1.7% (N = 2) who underwent upfront mastectomy with ≥ 3 positive SLNs or 1-2 positive SLNs not meeting RT criteria (p = 0.13). No factors were associated with ALND, including T stage, upfront versus NAC approach, or tumor subtype.
Conclusion: Nodal disease burden is low among cT1N0 TN/HER2+ patients even in the absence of routine axillary ultrasound. ALND was performed in < 2% of patients with cT1N0 TN/HER2+ disease who had upfront surgery, and adjuvant systemic therapy was de-escalated among many pathologically node-negative patients following surgery.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.