德国紧急医疗技术人员中的第二种受害者现象:基于SeViD调查问卷(SeViD- viii)的横断面研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hartwig Marung, Victoria Klemm, Reinhard Strametz, Thomas Neusius, Matthias Raspe, Hannah Roesner, Harald Karutz, Klaus Runggaldier, Rainer Petzina, Luis Teichmann, Stefan Bushuven
{"title":"德国紧急医疗技术人员中的第二种受害者现象:基于SeViD调查问卷(SeViD- viii)的横断面研究。","authors":"Hartwig Marung, Victoria Klemm, Reinhard Strametz, Thomas Neusius, Matthias Raspe, Hannah Roesner, Harald Karutz, Klaus Runggaldier, Rainer Petzina, Luis Teichmann, Stefan Bushuven","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01298-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medical technicians (EMTs) frequently encounter high-stress, traumatic events, making them vulnerable to the second victim phenomenon (SVP), a state of emotional distress following adverse patient-related incidents. While SVP is well documented among physicians and nurses, research on EMTs remains limited. This study examines the prevalence, risk factors, symptom burden, and preferred support strategies for SVP among German EMTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the validated SeViD questionnaire (Second Victims in German-speaking countries). The survey assessed SVP prevalence, symptom severity, and preferred support measures. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of SVP and symptom burden. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and occupational characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 699 respondents, 528 (75.5%) completed the survey. The prevalence of SVP was 65.3%, with 53.3% reporting SVP within the past 12 months. The most common triggering events were unexpected patient deaths (37.1%) and aggressive behavior from patients or relatives (19.1%). Logistic regression revealed that professional experience (OR = 1.055, p < 0.001) and employment in ground-based intensive care transport (OR = 2.444, p = 0.004) were risk factors for SVP, whereas male gender (OR = 0.392, p < 0.001) and conscientiousness (OR = 0.765, p = 0.033) were factors associated with lower risk. Higher extraversion was associated with lower symptom burden (OR = 0.754, p = 0.013). The most valued support measures were legal consultation and professional counseling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SVP is highly prevalent among EMTs and has significant psychological and emotional consequences. Greater work experience and intensive care transport roles increase SVP risk, whereas conscientiousness and extraversion appear protective. The implementation of structured peer support programs may help mitigate the impact of SVP.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The second victim phenomenon among German emergency medical technicians: a cross-sectional study based on the SeViD questionnaire (SeViD-VIII).\",\"authors\":\"Hartwig Marung, Victoria Klemm, Reinhard Strametz, Thomas Neusius, Matthias Raspe, Hannah Roesner, Harald Karutz, Klaus Runggaldier, Rainer Petzina, Luis Teichmann, Stefan Bushuven\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01298-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medical technicians (EMTs) frequently encounter high-stress, traumatic events, making them vulnerable to the second victim phenomenon (SVP), a state of emotional distress following adverse patient-related incidents. While SVP is well documented among physicians and nurses, research on EMTs remains limited. This study examines the prevalence, risk factors, symptom burden, and preferred support strategies for SVP among German EMTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the validated SeViD questionnaire (Second Victims in German-speaking countries). The survey assessed SVP prevalence, symptom severity, and preferred support measures. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of SVP and symptom burden. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and occupational characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 699 respondents, 528 (75.5%) completed the survey. The prevalence of SVP was 65.3%, with 53.3% reporting SVP within the past 12 months. The most common triggering events were unexpected patient deaths (37.1%) and aggressive behavior from patients or relatives (19.1%). Logistic regression revealed that professional experience (OR = 1.055, p < 0.001) and employment in ground-based intensive care transport (OR = 2.444, p = 0.004) were risk factors for SVP, whereas male gender (OR = 0.392, p < 0.001) and conscientiousness (OR = 0.765, p = 0.033) were factors associated with lower risk. Higher extraversion was associated with lower symptom burden (OR = 0.754, p = 0.013). The most valued support measures were legal consultation and professional counseling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SVP is highly prevalent among EMTs and has significant psychological and emotional consequences. Greater work experience and intensive care transport roles increase SVP risk, whereas conscientiousness and extraversion appear protective. The implementation of structured peer support programs may help mitigate the impact of SVP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306064/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01298-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01298-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:紧急医疗技术人员(emt)经常遇到高压力、创伤性事件,使他们容易受到第二受害者现象(SVP)的影响,这是一种与患者相关的不良事件后的情绪困扰状态。虽然SVP在医生和护士中有很好的记录,但对急诊医师的研究仍然有限。本研究考察了德国急诊医师SVP的患病率、危险因素、症状负担和首选支持策略。方法:采用经验证的SeViD问卷(德语国家的第二受害者)进行横断面调查。该调查评估了SVP的患病率、症状严重程度和首选的支持措施。采用二元logistic回归分析SVP和症状负担的预测因素。描述性统计用于总结人口统计学和职业特征。结果:699名被调查者中,完成调查的有528人,占75.5%。SVP患病率为65.3%,其中53.3%报告在过去12个月内发生SVP。最常见的触发事件是患者意外死亡(37.1%)和患者或亲属的攻击行为(19.1%)。结论:SVP在急诊医师中非常普遍,并具有显著的心理和情绪后果。更丰富的工作经验和重症监护转运角色会增加SVP风险,而尽责性和外向性似乎具有保护作用。实施结构化的同伴支持计划可能有助于减轻SVP的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The second victim phenomenon among German emergency medical technicians: a cross-sectional study based on the SeViD questionnaire (SeViD-VIII).

Background: Emergency medical technicians (EMTs) frequently encounter high-stress, traumatic events, making them vulnerable to the second victim phenomenon (SVP), a state of emotional distress following adverse patient-related incidents. While SVP is well documented among physicians and nurses, research on EMTs remains limited. This study examines the prevalence, risk factors, symptom burden, and preferred support strategies for SVP among German EMTs.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the validated SeViD questionnaire (Second Victims in German-speaking countries). The survey assessed SVP prevalence, symptom severity, and preferred support measures. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of SVP and symptom burden. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and occupational characteristics.

Results: Among the 699 respondents, 528 (75.5%) completed the survey. The prevalence of SVP was 65.3%, with 53.3% reporting SVP within the past 12 months. The most common triggering events were unexpected patient deaths (37.1%) and aggressive behavior from patients or relatives (19.1%). Logistic regression revealed that professional experience (OR = 1.055, p < 0.001) and employment in ground-based intensive care transport (OR = 2.444, p = 0.004) were risk factors for SVP, whereas male gender (OR = 0.392, p < 0.001) and conscientiousness (OR = 0.765, p = 0.033) were factors associated with lower risk. Higher extraversion was associated with lower symptom burden (OR = 0.754, p = 0.013). The most valued support measures were legal consultation and professional counseling.

Conclusions: SVP is highly prevalent among EMTs and has significant psychological and emotional consequences. Greater work experience and intensive care transport roles increase SVP risk, whereas conscientiousness and extraversion appear protective. The implementation of structured peer support programs may help mitigate the impact of SVP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信