Lea Marie Keßling, Anna Altemeier, Dennis Nebel, Sarah Ettinger, Kiriakos Daniilidis, Christian Plaaß, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Leif Claaßen
{"title":"自体常驻组织骨锚重建外侧和内侧韧带的生物力学测试:不同重建技术对稳定性和活动性的影响","authors":"Lea Marie Keßling, Anna Altemeier, Dennis Nebel, Sarah Ettinger, Kiriakos Daniilidis, Christian Plaaß, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Leif Claaßen","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-06004-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The optimal surgical technique for chronic ankle instability remains disputable. This study had two main questions: the effect of additional medial collateral ligament (MCL) stabilisation in ankle instability and comparison of open and arthroscopic surgical techniques for lateral ligament repair.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used 10 fresh-frozen cadaver feet (Science Care, Phoenix, AZ, USA) per group. Eight states were tested in an open surgery group: native; MCL cut; MCL repair; anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) cut; calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) cut; MCL re-cut + ATFL repair; MCL re-cut + AFTL and CFL repair; and MCL, ATFL, and CFL repair. Three states were tested in an arthroscopic group: Native; ATFL cut; and ATFL repair. A multidirectional loading test with five different movements (anterior translation (AT), supination (SUP), pronation (PRO), internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER)) was performed using a robotic system with six degrees-of-freedom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Refixation of the ATFL and CFL resulted in significant reductions in AT, IR, and SUP laxities (p < 0.05). Compared to this we observed a significant reduction of ER and PRO laxity when the MCL was additionally repaired (\"MCL, ATFL and CFL repair\") (p < 0.05). The outcomes of \"MCL, ATFL and CFL repair\" of the open procedure showed no significant differences in AT, SUP and IR laxity in the different ankle positions to the outcomes of \"ATFL repair\" of the arthroscopic procedure (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lateral ligamentoplasty leads to stabilisation of the ankle joint in AT, IR and SUP. Additional medial stabilisation resulted in further stabilisation, highlighting the relevance of preoperative and intraoperative evaluations of the medial ankle ligaments treating ankle instability. The stabilisation of the ankle joint by open and arthroscopic techniques was comparable for lateral ligament repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical testing of lateral and medial ligament reconstruction using bone anchors with autologous resident tissue: influence of different reconstruction techniques on stability and mobility.\",\"authors\":\"Lea Marie Keßling, Anna Altemeier, Dennis Nebel, Sarah Ettinger, Kiriakos Daniilidis, Christian Plaaß, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Leif Claaßen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-06004-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The optimal surgical technique for chronic ankle instability remains disputable. This study had two main questions: the effect of additional medial collateral ligament (MCL) stabilisation in ankle instability and comparison of open and arthroscopic surgical techniques for lateral ligament repair.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used 10 fresh-frozen cadaver feet (Science Care, Phoenix, AZ, USA) per group. Eight states were tested in an open surgery group: native; MCL cut; MCL repair; anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) cut; calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) cut; MCL re-cut + ATFL repair; MCL re-cut + AFTL and CFL repair; and MCL, ATFL, and CFL repair. Three states were tested in an arthroscopic group: Native; ATFL cut; and ATFL repair. A multidirectional loading test with five different movements (anterior translation (AT), supination (SUP), pronation (PRO), internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER)) was performed using a robotic system with six degrees-of-freedom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Refixation of the ATFL and CFL resulted in significant reductions in AT, IR, and SUP laxities (p < 0.05). Compared to this we observed a significant reduction of ER and PRO laxity when the MCL was additionally repaired (\\\"MCL, ATFL and CFL repair\\\") (p < 0.05). The outcomes of \\\"MCL, ATFL and CFL repair\\\" of the open procedure showed no significant differences in AT, SUP and IR laxity in the different ankle positions to the outcomes of \\\"ATFL repair\\\" of the arthroscopic procedure (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lateral ligamentoplasty leads to stabilisation of the ankle joint in AT, IR and SUP. Additional medial stabilisation resulted in further stabilisation, highlighting the relevance of preoperative and intraoperative evaluations of the medial ankle ligaments treating ankle instability. The stabilisation of the ankle joint by open and arthroscopic techniques was comparable for lateral ligament repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-06004-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-06004-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
慢性踝关节不稳定的最佳手术技术仍有争议。本研究有两个主要问题:额外的内侧副韧带(MCL)稳定在踝关节不稳定中的作用,以及开放和关节镜下外侧韧带修复手术技术的比较。材料和方法:每组10只新鲜冷冻尸体脚(Science Care, Phoenix, AZ, USA)。在开放手术组中对八个州进行了测试:本地;制程降低;制程修理;距腓骨前韧带(ATFL)切开;跟腓骨韧带(CFL)切开;MCL再切+ ATFL修复;MCL再切+ AFTL和CFL修复;MCL、ATFL和CFL的修复。关节镜组测试了三种状态:原生状态;ATFL削减;和ATFL修复。使用六自由度机器人系统进行五种不同运动(前平移(AT),旋后(SUP),旋前(PRO),内旋(IR)和外旋(ER))的多向加载测试。结果:ATFL和CFL的再固定导致AT、IR和SUP自由度显著降低(p < 0.05)。结论:外侧韧带成形术可在AT、IR和SUP中稳定踝关节。额外的内侧稳定可导致进一步的稳定,突出了术前和术中评估踝关节内侧韧带治疗踝关节不稳定的相关性。踝关节的稳定通过开放和关节镜技术是相当的外侧韧带修复。
Biomechanical testing of lateral and medial ligament reconstruction using bone anchors with autologous resident tissue: influence of different reconstruction techniques on stability and mobility.
Introduction: The optimal surgical technique for chronic ankle instability remains disputable. This study had two main questions: the effect of additional medial collateral ligament (MCL) stabilisation in ankle instability and comparison of open and arthroscopic surgical techniques for lateral ligament repair.
Materials and methods: We used 10 fresh-frozen cadaver feet (Science Care, Phoenix, AZ, USA) per group. Eight states were tested in an open surgery group: native; MCL cut; MCL repair; anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) cut; calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) cut; MCL re-cut + ATFL repair; MCL re-cut + AFTL and CFL repair; and MCL, ATFL, and CFL repair. Three states were tested in an arthroscopic group: Native; ATFL cut; and ATFL repair. A multidirectional loading test with five different movements (anterior translation (AT), supination (SUP), pronation (PRO), internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER)) was performed using a robotic system with six degrees-of-freedom.
Results: Refixation of the ATFL and CFL resulted in significant reductions in AT, IR, and SUP laxities (p < 0.05). Compared to this we observed a significant reduction of ER and PRO laxity when the MCL was additionally repaired ("MCL, ATFL and CFL repair") (p < 0.05). The outcomes of "MCL, ATFL and CFL repair" of the open procedure showed no significant differences in AT, SUP and IR laxity in the different ankle positions to the outcomes of "ATFL repair" of the arthroscopic procedure (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Lateral ligamentoplasty leads to stabilisation of the ankle joint in AT, IR and SUP. Additional medial stabilisation resulted in further stabilisation, highlighting the relevance of preoperative and intraoperative evaluations of the medial ankle ligaments treating ankle instability. The stabilisation of the ankle joint by open and arthroscopic techniques was comparable for lateral ligament repair.
期刊介绍:
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance.
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).