Shu Meguro, Yusuke Iwasaki, Junpei Ueda, Mikiko Okahashi, Yukio Kume, Takuji Kohzuma, Eri Shimizu, Hiroko Takeda, Satoshi Hirayama, Emiko Hosoba, Terumichi Nakagawa, Asako Sato
{"title":"验证日本临床化学学会推荐(JSCC)糖化白蛋白测定参考测量程序。","authors":"Shu Meguro, Yusuke Iwasaki, Junpei Ueda, Mikiko Okahashi, Yukio Kume, Takuji Kohzuma, Eri Shimizu, Hiroko Takeda, Satoshi Hirayama, Emiko Hosoba, Terumichi Nakagawa, Asako Sato","doi":"10.1177/00045632251367235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTo clarify the fundamental characteristics of the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry reference measurement procedure (JSCC RMP) for glycated albumin (GA), an additional performance study was performed and the correlation between the HPLC method and JSCC RMP was re-evaluated.MethodsRepeatability, detection limit, addition recovery, uncertainty of measurement, inter-laboratory comparison, correlation between JSCC RMP and HPLC method were evaluated.ResultsThe coefficient of variation (CV) of the total repeatability for the nine pretreated samples including isotope dilution and hydrolysis, defining that the averages of each of nine MS measurement samples are independent measurement vials, was 1.0%(<i>n</i> = 9). The limit of detection and Quantification of the GA values were 7.4 and 29.5 mmol/mol, respectively. Addition recovery rates were 99.6%-100.4%. The strong correlation (r = 0.999) of measured six serum samples between two laboratories was observed. Certified values and expanded uncertainties for JCCRM 611-2 (M, H, HH) using the JSCC RMP were as follows: JCCRM 611-2M: 232 and 9 mmol/mol, JCCRM611-2H: 359 and 14 mmol/mol, JCCRM611-2HH: 556 and 22 mmol/mol, respectively. The regression equation obtained using the Passing-Bablok method was GA (%)<sub>HPLC</sub> = 0.0523 × GA (mmol/mol) <sub>JSCC RMP</sub> + 1.315.ConclusionThe basic performance of the JSCC reference procedure for GA measurement was good, and similar results were obtained at other facilities, so it was considered to be robust and suitable as a reference method for GA measurement. Additionally, an equation was established to convert JSCC RMP (mmol/mol) values to the HPLC% values used in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"45632251367235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry (JSCC) recommended reference measurement procedure for glycated albumin determination.\",\"authors\":\"Shu Meguro, Yusuke Iwasaki, Junpei Ueda, Mikiko Okahashi, Yukio Kume, Takuji Kohzuma, Eri Shimizu, Hiroko Takeda, Satoshi Hirayama, Emiko Hosoba, Terumichi Nakagawa, Asako Sato\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632251367235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundTo clarify the fundamental characteristics of the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry reference measurement procedure (JSCC RMP) for glycated albumin (GA), an additional performance study was performed and the correlation between the HPLC method and JSCC RMP was re-evaluated.MethodsRepeatability, detection limit, addition recovery, uncertainty of measurement, inter-laboratory comparison, correlation between JSCC RMP and HPLC method were evaluated.ResultsThe coefficient of variation (CV) of the total repeatability for the nine pretreated samples including isotope dilution and hydrolysis, defining that the averages of each of nine MS measurement samples are independent measurement vials, was 1.0%(<i>n</i> = 9). The limit of detection and Quantification of the GA values were 7.4 and 29.5 mmol/mol, respectively. Addition recovery rates were 99.6%-100.4%. The strong correlation (r = 0.999) of measured six serum samples between two laboratories was observed. Certified values and expanded uncertainties for JCCRM 611-2 (M, H, HH) using the JSCC RMP were as follows: JCCRM 611-2M: 232 and 9 mmol/mol, JCCRM611-2H: 359 and 14 mmol/mol, JCCRM611-2HH: 556 and 22 mmol/mol, respectively. The regression equation obtained using the Passing-Bablok method was GA (%)<sub>HPLC</sub> = 0.0523 × GA (mmol/mol) <sub>JSCC RMP</sub> + 1.315.ConclusionThe basic performance of the JSCC reference procedure for GA measurement was good, and similar results were obtained at other facilities, so it was considered to be robust and suitable as a reference method for GA measurement. Additionally, an equation was established to convert JSCC RMP (mmol/mol) values to the HPLC% values used in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"45632251367235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251367235\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251367235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry (JSCC) recommended reference measurement procedure for glycated albumin determination.
BackgroundTo clarify the fundamental characteristics of the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry reference measurement procedure (JSCC RMP) for glycated albumin (GA), an additional performance study was performed and the correlation between the HPLC method and JSCC RMP was re-evaluated.MethodsRepeatability, detection limit, addition recovery, uncertainty of measurement, inter-laboratory comparison, correlation between JSCC RMP and HPLC method were evaluated.ResultsThe coefficient of variation (CV) of the total repeatability for the nine pretreated samples including isotope dilution and hydrolysis, defining that the averages of each of nine MS measurement samples are independent measurement vials, was 1.0%(n = 9). The limit of detection and Quantification of the GA values were 7.4 and 29.5 mmol/mol, respectively. Addition recovery rates were 99.6%-100.4%. The strong correlation (r = 0.999) of measured six serum samples between two laboratories was observed. Certified values and expanded uncertainties for JCCRM 611-2 (M, H, HH) using the JSCC RMP were as follows: JCCRM 611-2M: 232 and 9 mmol/mol, JCCRM611-2H: 359 and 14 mmol/mol, JCCRM611-2HH: 556 and 22 mmol/mol, respectively. The regression equation obtained using the Passing-Bablok method was GA (%)HPLC = 0.0523 × GA (mmol/mol) JSCC RMP + 1.315.ConclusionThe basic performance of the JSCC reference procedure for GA measurement was good, and similar results were obtained at other facilities, so it was considered to be robust and suitable as a reference method for GA measurement. Additionally, an equation was established to convert JSCC RMP (mmol/mol) values to the HPLC% values used in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).